> In the documentation it has the following code which is NOT how they
> do it in URLRewriter.  They use find not match and this just about
> killed me.  Here is code proving find and match are different....

>                String pat = "^/([a-zA-Z]*)(\\?.*)?";
>                Pattern pattern1 =  Pattern.compile(pat, Pattern.CASE_INSENSITIVE);

>                String url = "/web/home.xhtml";
>                Matcher matcher = pattern1.matcher(url);

>                boolean matches = matcher.matches();

>                matcher.reset();

>                //if not found return..
>                boolean wasFound = matcher.find();

> notice match returns false as I expect, and find returns true!!!!!

> The documentation in URLRewriter has this which is not how they do it
> in the code(they use find which IS different...this is a major BUG in
> my eyes).....I was not expecting it to match my rule but it did
> because it found a match inside my rule.  I should be able to define a
> rule that if not matched continues on even if there is a section that
> does match!!!  but I can't because URLRewriter was using fine...at
> least in the version of code I have!!!

>    Pattern.compile(<from> element);
>    pattern.matcher(each request url);
>    matcher.replaceAll(<to> element);
>    if ( <condition> elements match && pattern matched ) {
>    execute <run> elements (if any)
>    perform <to> element (if any)
>    }

> Anyways, bottom line....Use find in your unit tests to determine if
> your regex is correct..do not use match which is different!!!  Can we
> get this fixed???