Does anyone have access to the Vis Bucks, there is evidently a pedigree for Montgomery of Sherrington there and I'd very much like to see it.
I have a feeling, that's all it is right now, that we have more descents from the Smith family of Withcotes. I need however to see it state clearly that Anne Montgomery is the daughter of Anne Smith (or even "Miss" Smith)
On Jul 4, 4:10 pm, wjhonson <wjhon...@aol.com> wrote:
> Does anyone have access to the Vis Bucks, there is evidently a > pedigree for Montgomery of Sherrington there and I'd very much like to > see it.
> I have a feeling, that's all it is right now, that we have more > descents from the Smith family of Withcotes. I need however to see it > state clearly that Anne Montgomery is the daughter of Anne Smith (or > even "Miss" Smith)
> Thanks > Will Johnson
The pedigree of Montgomery of Sherington in the 1634 Visitation of Bucks (HSP v. 58) is very short (3 generations or so) and does not mention an Anne Montgomery or any Smiths.
You might find something on this family in Lipscomb's "History and Antiquities of Buckinghamshire".
> The pedigree of Montgomery of Sherington in the 1634 Visitation of > Bucks (HSP v. 58) is very short (3 generations or so) and does not > mention an Anne Montgomery or any Smiths.
> You might find something on this family in Lipscomb's "History and > Antiquities of Buckinghamshire".
says that Anne Montgomery, dau of Sherrington married Richard Halford of Edith Weston
The time periods involved *could* make these two fit together and it would be easy to see how a daughter could be named "Anne" after her mother BUT these too much missing here to be absolutely sure.
John Hunt of Lyndon, co Rutland (d 17 Mar 1585/6) by his wife Amice Cave "Amy" "Anne" (Bur 3 Jun 1599 at Lyndon) had at least or exactly eight children.
Amice Cave is a Cecil 3 so the below document is very interesting. Evidently these are, at least part of, the family reps 30 years later.
Leicestershire, Leicester and Rutland Record Office: Conant MSS CONANT MSS Catalogue Ref. DG11 Creator(s): Conant family of Lyndon Hall, Rutland Barker family of Lyndon Hall, Rutland MUNIMENTS OF TITLE - DEEDS FILE [no title] - ref. DG11/558 - date: 1634 May 22 [from Scope and Content] Articles of Agreement for Sage: (a) Edward Hunt of Lynden, co. Rutland, esq., (b) Valentyne Saunders of Chiswick, co. Middlesex, esq.: agreement between the said parties whereby the said Edward Hunt and Anne Hunt of Lynden, widow and mother of the said Edward and Thomas Hunt and John Hunt, brothers of the said Edward shall before the 20th June next following convey to the said Valentyne Saunders:- (a) manor of LYNDEN with all its members lying in the county of Rutland (b) advowson of rectory, parsonage and church of LYNDEN (c) one yardland in LYNDEN lately purchased by the said Edward Hunt from Richard Halford of Edith Weston and known as Wymarkes yardland (d) all other manors, messuages, etc., in LYNDEN whereof they have any freehold except (i) the estate made to the said Anne of Irelandes house and (ii) other lands mentioned in the Tripartite Indenture made 19 (?) May 5 Charles I between (a) Edward Hunt and Anne Hunt (b) Thomas Levytt and Robert Kirkham, esqs. (c) Edward Phillips and William Cooke and Thomas Hunt and John Hunt.
> John Hunt of Lyndon, co Rutland (d 17 Mar 1585/6) by his wife Amice > Cave "Amy" "Anne" (Bur 3 Jun 1599 at Lyndon) had at least or exactly > eight children.
> Amice Cave is a Cecil 3 so the below document is very interesting. > Evidently these are, at least part of, the family reps 30 years > later.
> Leicestershire, Leicester and Rutland Record Office: Conant MSS > CONANT MSS > Catalogue Ref. DG11 > Creator(s): Conant family of Lyndon Hall, Rutland > Barker family of Lyndon Hall, Rutland > MUNIMENTS OF TITLE - DEEDS > FILE [no title] - ref. DG11/558 - date: 1634 May 22 > [from Scope and Content] Articles of Agreement for Sage: (a) Edward > Hunt of Lynden, co. Rutland, esq., (b) Valentyne Saunders of Chiswick, > co. Middlesex, esq.: agreement between the said parties whereby the > said Edward Hunt and Anne Hunt of Lynden, widow and mother of the said > Edward and Thomas Hunt and John Hunt, brothers of the said Edward > shall before the 20th June next following convey to the said Valentyne > Saunders:- (a) manor of LYNDEN with all its members lying in the > county of Rutland (b) advowson of rectory, parsonage and church of > LYNDEN (c) one yardland in LYNDEN lately purchased by the said Edward > Hunt from Richard Halford of Edith Weston and known as Wymarkes > yardland (d) all other manors, messuages, etc., in LYNDEN whereof they > have any freehold except (i) the estate made to the said Anne of > Irelandes house and (ii) other lands mentioned in the Tripartite > Indenture made 19 (?) May 5 Charles I between (a) Edward Hunt and Anne > Hunt (b) Thomas Levytt and Robert Kirkham, esqs. (c) Edward Phillips > and William Cooke and Thomas Hunt and John Hunt.
> Will Johnson
Look at this, this is very exciting. I'm sure we all agree that the Anne widow above *must* be Anne (Hasellrigg) Hunt below in Vis Rutland 1618-9 Hunt
> > The pedigree of Montgomery of Sherington in the 1634 Visitation of > > Bucks (HSP v. 58) is very short (3 generations or so) and does not > > mention an Anne Montgomery or any Smiths.
> > You might find something on this family in Lipscomb's "History and > > Antiquities of Buckinghamshire".
> says that Anne Montgomery, dau of Sherrington > married Richard Halford of Edith Weston
> The time periods involved *could* make these two fit together and > it would be easy to see how a daughter could be named "Anne" after her > mother > BUT these too much missing here to be absolutely sure.
> Will Johnson
FWIW, the pedigree I cited ends with the following individual: "Sherington Montgomery a da. and h." [sic]. It was not immediately clear to me whether "da. and h." referred to Sherrington (the British do have a quirk of using surnames as given names even for their daughters!) or to his daughter. But perhaps the "da. and h." refers to the Anne who mar. Richard Halford.
Sherington [sic] is shown as the child of William Montgomery of Sherington and his wife Margaret, dau. of Robert Belcher of Lamport, Lancashire. William is shown as the son of Michael Montgomery of Sherrington [sic].
FWIW, the pedigree I cited ends with the following individual: "Sherington Montgomery a da. and h." [sic]. It was not immediately clear to me whether "da. and h." referred to Sherrington (the British do have a quirk of using surnames as given names even for their daughters!) or to his daughter. But perhaps the "da. and h." refers to the Anne who mar. Richard Halford.
-----------
Thanks yes. My issue isn't with who the father was, but rather who the MOTHER was. :)
