The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 |
Newsgroups: sci.environment
From: "peroxisome" <peroxis...@ntlworld.com>
Date: 3 Feb 2005 08:41:01 -0800
Local: Thurs, Feb 3 2005 11:41 am
Subject: Re: McKintyre & McKitrick publish again !
>You denialists cite John Daly, CO2 science, SEEP, Lomborg, Cato Hi Lloyd >Institute, etc. When we direct you to the scientific journals, you ignore >them. I am not sure I understand your argument. Are you saying that hypocrisy is okay if you believe in MBH'98 ? That two wrongs make a right ? Or are you saying it is pretty poor to make an abusive statement about a paper when you have not even read that paper ? >>I will say that the Mann & Schmidt comment on real climate makes My qualifications for this are that I can read, and understand logic. >>several statements which I believe to be factually incorrect. >And your qualifications to make this judgment are? That's all it takes. For example, when Mann says: "All of their original claims have now been fully discredited " this is a straightforward untruth. Mann himself published in 2004, acknowledging that M&M had drawn his attention to a number of errors in MBH'98. Therefore, Mann himself has acknowledged that some of the claims of M&M are true. Given that Mann made this latter statement in 2005, and he himself has yours a little confused You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| |||||||||||||