The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 |
Newsgroups: sci.environment
From: "peroxisome" <peroxis...@ntlworld.com>
Date: 4 Feb 2005 08:54:13 -0800
Local: Fri, Feb 4 2005 11:54 am
Subject: Re: McKintyre & McKitrick publish again !
>The substantive point seems to be whether or not the late 20th century rate. >is abnormally warm and also perhaps warming at an abnormally rapid yes; this seems important. >The other reconstructions certainly seem to support the former remind me James; how many of these proxy records go up to 2004, and how >(abnormally warm). many show the unprecedented and abnormal warming ? As opposed to the instrumental record... >It is not so clear to me that the rate of warming is Let me rephrase the question again. If you are asserting that other >abnormal, the Esper curve in particular shows some rapid changes. reconstructions support MBH, how do we know that is so ? If someone else has done a reconstruction, is that in itself enough to support MBH ? Does it have to be within 0.1C ? Does it have to be within the +/- two sigma range, or can a line be within that two sigma range, but still be inconsistent with MBH ? I notice you are quite wilfully neglecting to comment on the fact that You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| |||||||||||||