The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 |
Newsgroups: sci.energy, sci.energy.hydrogen
From: quibbler <quibbler...@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2003 09:36:29 -0700
Local: Thurs, Mar 13 2003 11:36 am
Subject: Re: YA Hydrogen article - positive this time
In article <h%%ba.23207$yc5.4...@twister.nyroc.rr.com>,
jspence...@stny.rr.com says... > > Even if the hydrogen cycle can be made a bit Certainly if we can afford to give 1.5 trillion dollars in tax rebates, > > more efficient than current batteries, you must first charge them or > The article states that hydrogen is more efficient storage than batteries. largely to people who don't even need the money, then we could have afforded to spend that money on something else, like hydrogen fuel research. I have no objection to improving fuel cells, but it seems like fuel cells are only a secondary part of our energy needs. It's probably more important to get more wind, hydro and solar power production facilities online. These are direct energy producers that can reduce our dependence on imported fuels right away. IMO, if we had to focus on a single technology, it should be wind turbines. These can be sited and installed faster than most fossil fuel plants and the electricity they produce would free up resources like domestic natural gas, which can be used to power vehicles. -- You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| |||||||||||||