Google Groups Home
Help | Sign in
Balancing over Weak 1NT
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  20 messages - Collapse all
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
Terry Faust  
View profile
 More options May 16, 10:08 am
Newsgroups: rec.games.bridge
From: Terry Faust <m...@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 16 May 2008 10:08:03 -0400
Local: Fri, May 16 2008 10:08 am
Subject: Balancing over Weak 1NT
Assume that when opponents open a weak NT (12-14) you play your
standard defense in the direct seat that includes double is penalty.

After 1NT Pass Pass,

1.  Do you still play your standard defense?

2.  Is double still penalty or should it now be for takeout?

Thanks


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
kingfish  
View profile
 More options May 16, 10:57 am
Newsgroups: rec.games.bridge
From: kingfish <sandybarnes...@verizon.net>
Date: Fri, 16 May 2008 07:57:30 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Fri, May 16 2008 10:57 am
Subject: Re: Balancing over Weak 1NT
On May 16, 7:08 am, Terry Faust <m...@comcast.net> wrote:

> Assume that when opponents open a weak NT (12-14) you play your
> standard defense in the direct seat that includes double is penalty.

> After 1NT Pass Pass,

> 1.  Do you still play your standard defense?

> 2.  Is double still penalty or should it now be for takeout?

> Thanks

   ***
No matter your hand strength, your high cards are not well positioned
with the bidder behind you, so this is a consideration.  I believe
that double is better used in a conventional sense.  In addition,
there is greater need to be able to "balance" with a natural suit
call.  My suggestion is that you use Double for 2-suited hand types,
and use natural suit bids.  In my partnerships we use the balancing
Double for the Majors, and other calls to be natural.

Sandy Barnes
   ***


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Michael Angelo Ravera  
View profile
 More options May 16, 12:17 pm
Newsgroups: rec.games.bridge
From: Michael Angelo Ravera <marav...@prodigy.net>
Date: Fri, 16 May 2008 09:17:08 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Fri, May 16 2008 12:17 pm
Subject: Re: Balancing over Weak 1NT
On May 16, 7:57 am, kingfish <sandybarnes...@verizon.net> wrote:

Basically, Sandy is right that you won't often know thay it is right
to penalize in the protection seat.

While I play either Mohan or Capp against Weak 1NT in the direct seat
(with an optional double), I find it useful to play Bergen (DONT) in
the protection seat against both weak and strong 1NT openers.

X=Long suit (partner can sometimes convert for penalties)
2C=Clubs plus one of the 3 top suits
2D=Diamonds and one of the majors
2H=Majors
2S=Natural Usually 5(332) shape.


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Thomas Dehn  
View profile
 More options May 16, 1:23 pm
Newsgroups: rec.games.bridge
From: "Thomas Dehn" <thomas-use...@arcor.de>
Date: Fri, 16 May 2008 19:23:07 +0200
Local: Fri, May 16 2008 1:23 pm
Subject: Re: Balancing over Weak 1NT

"Terry Faust" <m...@comcast.net> wrote:
> Assume that when opponents open a weak NT (12-14) you play your
> standard defense in the direct seat that includes double is penalty.

> After 1NT Pass Pass,

> 1.  Do you still play your standard defense?

Yes if 4th seat is an unpassed hand.
No if 4th seat is a passed hand.

> 2.  Is double still penalty or should it now be for takeout?

I'm playing it as penalty if 4th hand seat is an unpassed hand.

Thomas


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Andrew  
View profile
 More options May 16, 1:33 pm
Newsgroups: rec.games.bridge
From: Andrew <agump...@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 16 May 2008 10:33:05 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Fri, May 16 2008 1:33 pm
Subject: Re: Balancing over Weak 1NT
On May 16, 7:08 am, Terry Faust <m...@comcast.net> wrote:

> Assume that when opponents open a weak NT (12-14) you play your
> standard defense in the direct seat that includes double is penalty.

> After 1NT Pass Pass,

> 1.  Do you still play your standard defense?

> 2.  Is double still penalty or should it now be for takeout?

> Thanks

I like the Mohan defense in both direct and balancing seat. The basics
are:

double = a big balanced hand
2C = majors
2D =>Hearts
2H =>Spades

The transfer allows the overcaller a chance to show a second suit or
extra values.

Andrew


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Henry Lockwood  
View profile
 More options May 16, 1:53 pm
Newsgroups: rec.games.bridge
From: Henry Lockwood <henry.lockw...@cantab.net>
Date: Fri, 16 May 2008 10:53:56 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Fri, May 16 2008 1:53 pm
Subject: Re: Balancing over Weak 1NT
On 16 May, 15:08, Terry Faust <m...@comcast.net> wrote:

> Assume that when opponents open a weak NT (12-14) you play your
> standard defense in the direct seat that includes double is penalty.

> After 1NT Pass Pass,

> 1.  Do you still play your standard defense?

> 2.  Is double still penalty or should it now be for takeout?

> Thanks

1. Yes: we play Suction, so each bid shows the suit above or the other
two (with some wrinkles).
2. It's penalty by an unpassed hand; we open anything unbalanced 5+
and balanced 12+, so a passed hand cannot be good enough to double for
penalties.  We haven't discussed what it means, but I am having
difficulty seeing any profit in getting involved at all (it's most
likely that we have nothing making; they might not be able to make
1NT).

    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Alan Malloy  
View profile
 More options May 16, 9:02 pm
Newsgroups: rec.games.bridge
From: Alan Malloy <alan.NO.S...@malloys.org>
Date: Fri, 16 May 2008 18:02:23 -0700
Local: Fri, May 16 2008 9:02 pm
Subject: Re: Balancing over Weak 1NT

Terry Faust wrote:
> Assume that when opponents open a weak NT (12-14) you play your
> standard defense in the direct seat that includes double is penalty.

> After 1NT Pass Pass,

> 1.  Do you still play your standard defense?

> 2.  Is double still penalty or should it now be for takeout?

> Thanks

Curiously, one of my regular partners (who does not read RGB) suggested
just today that we start playing a different defense to 1NT when in
balancing seat. I forget already what it's called, but the idea was that
X shows any two touching suits (I assume you use 2C relay with optional
Paradox stuff); 2C shows a three-suiter including clubs (clubs and 2
higher), 2D shows a three-suiter short in clubs (diamonds and 2 higher),
and 2M is natural. I haven't really thought very hard about this
defense; does anyone see a particular merit or danger of playing it?

--
Cheers,
        Alan (San Jose, California, USA)


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Adam Beneschan  
View profile
 More options May 16, 9:56 pm
Newsgroups: rec.games.bridge
From: Adam Beneschan <a...@irvine.com>
Date: Fri, 16 May 2008 18:56:07 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Fri, May 16 2008 9:56 pm
Subject: Re: Balancing over Weak 1NT
On May 16, 7:08 am, Terry Faust <m...@comcast.net> wrote:

> Assume that when opponents open a weak NT (12-14) you play your
> standard defense in the direct seat that includes double is penalty.

> After 1NT Pass Pass,

> 1.  Do you still play your standard defense?

> 2.  Is double still penalty or should it now be for takeout?

Is there such a thing as a takeout double when there are four unbid
suits?

My tendency would be to play it for penalty, but I'd need a stronger
hand than in direct seat.

                                  -- Adam


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Alan Malloy  
View profile
 More options May 16, 10:09 pm
Newsgroups: rec.games.bridge
From: Alan Malloy <alan.NO.S...@malloys.org>
Date: Fri, 16 May 2008 19:09:39 -0700
Local: Fri, May 16 2008 10:09 pm
Subject: Re: Balancing over Weak 1NT

Sure, just not a "generic takeout". e.g., you could play Woolsey, where
double shows a 4-card major and longer minor. This isn't the standard
takeout double ("please bid anything"), but definitely asks partner to
take out the double unless he has a reason to think 1NX is going down.

--
Cheers,
        Alan (San Jose, California, USA)


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Stephen Fischer  
View profile
 More options May 16, 10:15 pm
Newsgroups: rec.games.bridge
From: Stephen Fischer <stephendotfisc...@aviarydotnet.au>
Date: Sat, 17 May 2008 12:15:48 +1000
Local: Fri, May 16 2008 10:15 pm
Subject: Re: Balancing over Weak 1NT

I've even seen that agreement in the direct seat - from two different
pairs.  Sure enough, both times they had an opening hand with 3+ card
support for all the unbid suits.  Both times their partner jumped in a
four card suit with a balanced 10-11 count.

Needless to say, we now treat a "takeout" of our 1NT opening the same
way as a penalty double.  They might sort themselves out next time.


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Alan Malloy  
View profile
 More options May 16, 11:00 pm
Newsgroups: rec.games.bridge
From: Alan Malloy <alan.NO.S...@malloys.org>
Date: Fri, 16 May 2008 20:00:03 -0700
Local: Fri, May 16 2008 11:00 pm
Subject: Re: Balancing over Weak 1NT

Yes, this is the default agreement for confused pairs. We play their
"takeout" doubles as if they were penalty, except that on a marginal
hand we're more likely to pass than start a runout, figuring they'll
usually save us anyway.

--
Cheers,
        Alan (San Jose, California, USA)


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Kieran Dyke  
View profile
 More options May 17, 1:06 am
Newsgroups: rec.games.bridge
From: "Kieran Dyke" <tig...@idx.com.au>
Date: Sat, 17 May 2008 15:06:37 +1000
Local: Sat, May 17 2008 1:06 am
Subject: Re: Balancing over Weak 1NT