JOURNEY TO THE CENTER OF THE EARTH (2008)
(a film review by Mark R. Leeper)
CAPSULE: Fun as thrill ride, but surprisingly poor as
film, this is a story of three modern reluctant
explorers who find out that the center of the Earth
is just as Jules Verne described it with a lot of
fast theme-park-like rides. It has even less logic
than Verne gave it. Rent the 1959 version. Rating:
0 (-4 to +4) or 4/10
The 3D effects of JOURNEY TO THE CENTER OF THE EARTH 3D are
almost worth the price of admission. That means this film as a
whole is almost worth the price of admission. As an adaptation
of Jules Verne's novel this film is nearly worthless. In
fairness I should say that no Jules Verne novel has ever been
translated well to the screen and probably never will be. That
is just not how Verne writes generally. Possibly the best film
version of a Verne novel is the Disney 20,000 LEAGUES UNDER THE
SEA, but that film has a lot of inventing. In the book, after
the main characters are brought aboard the Nautilus they mostly
just see wonders rather than have adventures. Similarly, in
Verne's novel JOURNEY TO THE CENTER OF THE EARTH there is not
much action. Aside from occasional separations from the main
party the characters mostly just see occasionally scary wonders.
The 1959 film was one of the highlights of my youth but it made
good cinema only because of heavy revisions to Verne's story by
the writing team of Walter Reisch and Charles Bracket who had
previously written films like NINOTCHKA and TITANIC (1953).
Strictly speaking, the new 3D version of JOURNEY TO THE CENTER OF
THE EARTH is not an adaptation at all. It is an adventure that
takes place in our world with characters who are very much aware
of the Verne novel. (A similar approach was taken to the 2002
version of THE TIME MACHINE.) This film is more a vehicle to
show off 3D effects than it is to tell a real story. Life in the
interior of the Earth seems to have aspects of theme park rides,
video games, and both Disney and Warner Brothers cartoons. There
are some nice renderings of engravings from Jules Verne books
into real-looking albeit digital sets.
Trevor Anderson (played by Brendan Fraser) is a scientist who
discovers that he has to play host to his nephew Sean (Josh
Hutcherson) for two weeks. At the same time he discovers that
for some reason he has a limited time to access volcanic chimneys
into the center of the Earth. The reason for the rush is
unexplained by it has something to do with changing numbers on a
computer screen so it must be scientific.
Trevor packs up the nephew and off they head for Iceland. Along
the way they pick up Hannah sgeirsson (Anita Briem) the daughter
of a scientist who worked with Max. Max was Trevor's brother,
Sean's father, and a friend of Hannah's late father. The name
sgeirsson, incidentally, means "Son of Asgeir" and would never
be given to a woman. The credits list her father as Sigurbj rn
sgeirsson so she should have been Hannah Sigurbj rnsdottir.
Briem would have known that, being Icelandic herself, but getting
things accurate was just not where this film was at. The group
came to study the chimneys, but soon they are trapped inside the
Earth a long distance below the surface. Which brings us to the
falls.
Our hearty band frequently falls distances of many miles and
manages to land with no ill effects, like Alice in Wonderland.
Two such falls and they make it to the center of the Earth. That
saves time and story-telling, but it cuts out most of what would
be interesting in the film. Admittedly, how far down the center
of the Earth is a moot point. If the center is just a single
point it could be a long way down. If "center" refers to a very
large region it might not be that far down. (Think of it this
way. The center of an inflated balloon is a pocket of compressed
air that begins a small fraction of an inch below the surface.)
These are most unusual explorers. They can fall hundreds of
miles and land without breaking a bone. Hundreds of miles
beneath the surface of the Earth they never seem greatly
concerned for how they can get to safety. In 105-degree
temperatures they never seem to break a sweat or in the case of
Hannah even smear her lipstick. At one point a character is
jumping from one rock to the next in a line of rocks floating in
air suspended by magnetism. Somehow he manages to do this
without imparting any rotational momentum until he gets to the
very last rock. It just plays better if only the last rock has a
rotational momentum. The travelers brought no food with them and
rarely seem to pass much that is edible, but they always seem to
be well-fed. The film exempts itself from any laws of physics or
logic. Luminous birds that glow like fireflies illuminate the
world beneath the earth. These are birds from 150 million years
in our past, yet they look more like modern bluebirds than like
the archaeopteryx of that period. What is more, the birds seem
to understand English and show very human-like expressions like
some fugitives from Disney's CINDERELLA. One of the birds adopts
the travelers and follows them around like Tinkerbell.
Visually the film has some nice moments, but not all of the
images work. There is a large Tyrannosaurus Rex that looks like
a digital animation and is not believable as a living animal the
way the T-rex in JURASSIC PARK did. Too often the lighting is
too dim to really see the dimensional imagery to its full effect.
There is some blurring. Frequently the left- and right-eye
images do not coalesce. The 3D work, virtually the film's only
virtue, is a step down from that of BEOWULF. For me it would be
very hard for JOURNEY TO THE CENTER OF THE EARTH (2008) to match
the enjoyment that the 1959 version brought me. However, this
film does not even come close. The 3D effects are actually quite
nice usually, but see it for the 3D or not at all. I rate the
film a 0 on the -4 to +4 scale or 4/10.
Film Credits: <http://us.imdb.com/title/tt0373051/>
Mark R. Leeper
mlee...@optonline.net
Copyright 2008 Mark R. Leeper