Google Groups Home
Help | Sign in
Message from discussion SUCCESS!
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
Sun Tsu  
View profile
 More options Aug 8 2004, 4:24 pm
Newsgroups: news.admin.net-abuse.email
From: bananana...@2mbit.com (Sun Tsu)
Date: 8 Aug 2004 13:24:31 -0700
Local: Sun, Aug 8 2004 4:24 pm
Subject: Re: SUCCESS!
Andrew - Supernews <andrew+non...@supernews.com> wrote in message <news:slrnchbo2m.1pnu.andrew+nonews@trinity.supernews.net>...

> On 2004-08-07, Sun Tsu <bananana...@spamblocked.com> wrote:
> > You might want to spend your time seeking out Bob's true identity and
> > not wasting it on a personal vendetta.  Start by googling on "303
> > Second Street"

> 303 Second Street, San Francisco is a large office building. One of the
> companies that has offices there is ... Pacbell (SBC).

Glad to see that you can do research, albeit not thorough.  Now please
explain why you did *no* research before making a personal attack in
NANAE unprovoked.

You are suggesting that SBC is part of the problem and not part of the
solution.  Had you been thorough in your research you would have
noticed that more than one /29 is registered to 303 Second Street and
you completely overlooked the fact that spammy frequently registers
his IP blocks either in bogus names or in real names that belong to
someone other than himself.

You have neither proved nor disproved anything, but only added to the
obfuscation.

Well, you did prove one thing, Andrew, that your sole purpose in
posting in this thread is simply to satisfy a personal vendetta and
not to fight spam.

Did you bother to trace "303 Second Street" to any Sightings or SPEWS
records?  No. What you did was perfornm only enough research to
justify *your* point of view and to satisfy yourself which is why the
rest of your post was snipped unread.  You haven't sufficiently
demonstrated why anyone should take you serious in your misguided and
immature continuation of a personal vendetta.

Your inability to understand reality is clouded by your emotional need
to be right and to have it domonstrated in NANAE.  This was never
about you, Andrew, but you seem to want it to be, or need it to be.

No amount of words and FUD can make up for what you did.  Either admit
your mistake in NANAE or take it to email.  You are *still* on your
personal crusade and you *still* don't understand how to investigate
properly.  You don't have enough experience to know what you are
talking about.

Andrew, you made a false accusation manifested in a personal attack on
someone who didn't deserve it.  You were *wrong* and as previously
posted, you aren't man enough, or mature enough, to admit your
mistake, especially here in NANAE.

Adults admit when they make mistakes and apologise for them.  You
aren't acting like an adult in this matter.  Either address that issue
or stop posting in this thread.  Serious spam fighters don't have time
for your childish game.

Cheers,

SuN

--
É cchiù la spisa chi la prisa.


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2008 Google