In article <1107006301.758857.279...@c13g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>,
"Naveed" <naveed...@hotmail.com> wrote: > Hmm, nice language <crap>. I'm looking back fondly on the days when > this business attracted intelligent professionals. And you wonder why > all of your jobs are being exported to India.
You top-posted and full-quoted just to say that?
Wow.
I'll forgive you if you'll export jkhendrikson to India as well. Can you do that?
Richard
-- To reply via email, make sure you don't enter the whirlpool on river left.
In article <6wPKd.1210$E45...@fe51.usenetserver.com>,
Android Cat <androidca...@hotmail.com> wrote: >> Part of what bugs me is that I have no ideas for distinguishing the >> boxes of the thieves among the perhaps 50,000 small DCC clients. I >> only discover them when I write one of their larger customers that is >> triggering the DCC server rate limiting or that is sending several >> 100K useless requests/day thanks to misconfigured firewalls, and the >> luser says "What's the DCC? I'm using an Acme Spam and Virus Filter."
>Gaaaaah!
>I'd be tempted to feed them (mild) poison data. Let them complain to Acme.
By design, the ony poisoning you can do with the DCC is to say "that's not bulk mail," and is what the DCC client code does when it fails to get an answer from a DCC server. If I could distinguish the thieving boxes I would simply blacklist them somehow, along with others. See http://www.rhyolite.com/anti-spam/dcc/client-blacklist
On Sat, Jan 29, 2005 at 05:45:01AM -0800, Naveed wrote: > Hmm, nice language <crap>. I'm looking back fondly on the days when > this business attracted intelligent professionals.
I'm looking back fondly on the days when top-posting, whining assholes weren't bothering the adults with their childish rants. Run along, now: the big people have important work to do and you're in the way.
