Google Groups Home
Help | Sign in
Message from discussion KB891781 DHTML edit update - no such interface supported
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
Michael Vidrevich  
View profile
 More options Feb 21 2005, 9:02 am
Newsgroups: microsoft.public.inetsdk.programming.dhtml_editing
From: "Michael Vidrevich" <michae...@sapiens.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 16:02:20 +0200
Local: Mon, Feb 21 2005 9:02 am
Subject: Re: KB891781 DHTML edit update - no such interface supported
Hi, All!
I got the problem like this in my C++ code.
But my problem is incorrect use of IPersistStream. Microsoft guys changed
the internal format of the dhtmledit control description (persist stream
content) that used for store/restore object state. So, if you object calls
internal interfaces it may be a problem.

Best Regards & Good Luck,
Michael

"Pat Magnan" <p...@sluggo.org> wrote in message

news:a8b73b06.0502141643.242011b7@posting.google.com...
> Hi All:

> I haven't seen this exact issue posted here, but apologize if this has
> been replied to previously.

> The company I work for uses the MS DHTML edit control as our primary
> editor in our software product. Since the release of this hotfix, we
> have only developed one solution, which is to remove the update, then
> try to coerce our customer's corporate IT people to hold off deploying
> it.

> We did a little research with the DHTML edit control, and it would
> appear that many of the interfaces it exports return NULL pointers,
> specifically any interface which would return a reference to the DOM
> document. We access the object through the OCX, in a Delphi
> application, so perhaps there is a solution available to a C++
> developer that we don't currently have available.

> I know of a handful of other applications that are similarly broken,
> is there documentation available on a new method of using the
> control(s)? Is there a way to instantiate it that is 'safe' such that
> we can again access the DOM object? Running it in our application on
> the local machine doesn't seem like it should relate to 'cross site
> scripting' which is what was apparently resolved...


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2008 Google