wanted/needed to mention one more thing about this diagram
before moving further into this approach...
while it may be rather arbitrary how this doubling of plus
and minus signs occurred, it was an issue of convenience,
it also also has an aspect which may be relevant to issues
of rotation and directionality in a more complex configuration
of symmetric/asymmetric relations...
what if issues like matter/antimatter were to occur not across
but kitty-corner in some type of twisting (of 4D space-time, say,
while this may not be accurate to that in any way). what if an
issue like an anti-electron being called a positron may be of
a relation whereby, movement across this boundary may occur
not just between or with minus and plus (- and +) and instead,
could move charge via dynamics of positive minus +(-) as it
relates to plus (+). it is only to question the possibility of how
the geometry could be functioning differently, due to twists or
directionality as it may occur differently around zero/neutral.
for instance, what if 'electricity' were actually occurring
between + and -(+) on one-side of this boundary/divide/
threshold? or that there may be an anti-electricity which
could be tapped into. why is this not explored in terms of
charge. is it all because zero is considered totally null,
and thus acts as a stop-sign to any such movements?
likewise, what if rotation and counter-rotation could
simultaneously occur (say, vortice energy) between
two pairs or sets of polarized structures, such that
- and -(+) could function in one direction, and +(-)
and + could function in another direction, around
this zero fulcrum. whatever the case, it is curious
how zero may effect charge, and its more complex
aspects such as handedness. e.g. what if 'charge'
and current is actually + and +(-) as it relates to
zero/neutral/ground, instead of + and -? these are
written out here just in case they may be of any
relevance in the larger context of these diagrams
or this approach to questioning this realm.
{cont.}
