{note; on the last post forgot to mention 'blackholes/whiteholes' in
relation to potential access into/out-of the atheric medium, etc.}
---
okay. this post has been hard to begin, because it takes a lot
of abstraction to get to this point. though now it should begin
to be brought together in a more cohesive conceptualization...
remembering the above diagram, about a vacuum universe
and the aetheric medium below it, as it is connected at the N
or zero-point, which supposes access between these realms.
and then, there is another assumption, of a charged realm,
in the vacuum, and a non-charge based aetheric energy that
can move into this charged realm and 'motivate' it, so to say.
this image is from an earlier post and is only used to show the
step from the above diagram to the one that follows below...
that is, that we are going to consider this 'N' realm, in terms of
the number line again, yet also as a model for 'electricity' and
for how charge functions in terms of a moving current of charge.
thus, considering this base of the aetheric medium, as it may
be related to a 'neutral' condition of equilibrium, even. so, it is
in some sense tied into logic here, also. 3-value, plus, minus, N.
and so, for a model of the atom, in terms of charge, it could be
said that there is a neutral, a positive and a negative aspect.
and this is going to begin to look a little like a transistor diagram
or a logic gate (say, NPN or PNP type of considerations, even).
what is imagined here is that this issue of charge and of number
is also an issue of electricity if not more complexly, electro-
magnetism (in terms of a dual rotation or lines-of-force, etc).
and the key to this consideration is to reference back the post
on symmetry, and the potential for how this number line is going
to deal with this boundary condition, and how 'charge' (plus and
minus) may be related, in terms of basic or complex symmetries.
it could be possible, for instance, that the relation between minus
and plus, is actually occurring on the same side of the zero-realm,
whereby 'movement' occurs. that is, the relation of b with p, rather
than b with d, or b with q. thus, it is to question the assumption of
the number line (-, 0, +) as it relates to charge. as, what if it is not
the case that the electron is totally on the 'other' side of this
divide,
in the same way that antimatter may be, with a positiron (the anti-
electron) across this zero divide? what if the relation between the
particles of the electron and proton were same-sided symmetry?
such that, it is an issue of +(+) and -(+), or +proton and -electron,
versus +(+) proton and -(-) electron or +(-) electron? diagrams
will follow in another post to clarify this approach to questioning.
yet the basic situation is still rather straightforward. it is to
question
issues of logic, of charge, of number, and 'movement' between
these, especially in terms of aspects of equilibrium and imbalance.
so this stuff about the number line is basically entering into this
type of questioning. how might 'current' be formed in this scenario?
and how might it be assumed to function in terms of the curves of
the number line, if considered on the same scale, where zero is a
non-event? for instance, when somebody defines 'electricity' as a
the flow of charge from positive to negative, what is going on in
terms of the issues with the number line? does charge just move
through zero, or this zero-point, or this neutral equilibrium without
any change or transformation -- or might this motion begin within
this neutral or zero-point, which motivates the charge's relations?
for instance, what if the 'model' or arrangement of these charges
were divided by zero or the neutral ground. this could be a view
of the downward curve and upward curve of relations between
a +(+) and a -(-) flow of current that would move through zero.
in other words, in a one-sided modeling of 'charge' which could
place both 'differences' on one-side of zero, it would be possible
to imagine "electricity" occurs in a rudimentary way, in which the
electron (-) and proton (+) interact in such a way that this is able
to ignore neutral or ground, and some ~inherent motion exists,
by which to motivate this action. that is, the b with p symmetry,
rather than across this zero-divide of the number line: b/q or b|d.
in other words: 'charge' could exist on the same-side of the number
line, equivalent to positive +1 and negative +1, or +(+1) and -(+1),
which correspond to the electron and the proton. (as far as i gather,
the neutron is actually a balancing of charge, its equilibrium, within
an atom, versus a 'third' charge state with a unique differing quality;
this may or may not be mistaken yet the model can accommodate a
range of this neutral condition in terms of the 3-value logic involved.)
so the difference here, is, if you change the number line, the relation
between charge also changes. and so would a definition of current,
or the movement of charge between negative and positive...
for instance, the movement from 'negative' to 'positive' via current
flows, which may pass _through neutral or the ground state of the
circuit or the model of the number line. is this 'charge' arriving just
from the negative (-) or may it also be moving through/from this
neutrality? it is no small question, because it potentially involves
the previous issues of the vacuum and the medium of the aether...
in other words, what if this 'movement' that has been mapped into
the movement between negative and positive, which defines the
'current' or flow of electricity or electric charge, instead originates
in the destabilization of the aetheric medium, between charges?
what if this movement is from the aether, which drives the charge?
in other words, because of this difference in the number line and
its relation to zero (and thus, N, as a neutral or ground condition)-
it is possible to question the ~traditional model of electricity which
denies this zero-point as having another effect in terms of scale
and geometry. instead, it is assumed to be, simply: nothingness.
thus, the movement from negative to positive in a simple circuit
(on a breadboard, say, where the terminals of the battery, + and
-, are connected into a balanced circuit via a wire, and grounded)
would then be a question of if this grounding is actually within the
aetheric medium, 'outside' of this vacuum of space-time altogether.
thus, in one rudimentary version of the number line, there is an
overly simple model of electricity which denies import to this zero-
state or condition, including its equilibrium in terms of another realm
(N or 0 or infinity) - whereas, a second version of a more complex
number line would question this 'movement' assumed to simply and
magically exist between positive and negative 'charge' (whatever
that quality actually is or may be) and how it is assumed to flow
through 'neutral' or 'ground' or 'zero' as if moving between the
numbers one, two, and three, versus 1 and -1, if not between
1 and -1/10^10000000 or some other geometrical variation.
in other words, does "electricity" actually move _through this
zero or neutral realm, without being modified or transformed,
or might this movement actually originate within this zero or
neutral or ground state, which is being accessed via strucutral
relations between charges, as they can be harnessed?
the model of "electricity" is dissonant to my mind, having tried
to comprehend in the way it is approached in books, without
any intuitive understanding whatsoever to what is going on or
being dealt with. a battery is said to have charge that flows via
electrons, from its negative terminal through a wired circuit and
back into the positive terminal, where this flow is re-originated.
and, for some reason, this must be grounded to be balanced.
so, this movement is flowing from the ~quasi-negative toward
the ~quasi-positive, to get back to itself, in terms of electrons.
and through this scenario, the neutral or ground must also be
connected to. why? no one is sure, it seems (or so it is said).
"electrons just want to do this work" it is also seemingly said.
as a ~matter of faith, so to speak. to trust and believe in this.
including the limits to the questioning of zero, including that it
could even be imagined to be divided by, throughout history.
now, consider this same situation of charge in terms of the
number line. for this model of electricity to work, it must then
have 'current' which is flowing through this zero-point or this
neutral ground-state (equilibrium, it would seem) so as to get
back to itself. that is, electronic energy has motivation, power,
if it is arranged just right, just so, so that this dynamic occurs.
and it is said, assumed, believed, 'zero' has nothing to do with it...
that is, 'charge' which is somehow mysterious moving from
point A to point B is occurring without any prime motivation or
prime mover, beyond the fact that it is doing this. versus, the
consideration that 'charge' may be moving between a vacuum
and the aetheric medium, whereby it is picking up its motivation
to get about this circuitous path, via movement within structuring.
this is not only about the mathematics of zero, also, the politics
of zero. to consider that this movement is generated by such an
aetheric wind or wave or current, which establishes movement
in this universe, in this dimensionality, out of disequilibrium and
how it is managed and maintained, harnessed and-or exploited.
thus, "electricity" is, logically, most likely to occur and be defined
in this second more complex model of the number line, which
could include various ways to generate this flow or current, yet
which always will be connecting into a realm beyond this zero-
point, or though-it, seemingly.
"electric current" could thus find its motivation, its movement,
via this aetheric realm, via the required grounding necessary to
enable this flow to occur, yet while retaining a certain balancing.
magnetism, in this view, could be an issue of doubling and-or of
counterrotation, even, in a double-spiraling of such dynamics.
which may or may not be related to Maxwell's quarternions, in
terms of the mathematics used to describe this geometry, and
also "lost" from history via a crippling of the equations for how
electromagnetism functions, in the late 19th century, used today.
