Why Kari Kauffman Is A Bald Faced Liar - comp.software.year-2000

Message from discussion Why Kari Kauffman Is A Bald Faced Liar

fedinfo

More options Feb 7 1999, 3:00 am

Newsgroups: comp.software.year-2000

From: fedi...@halifax.com

Date: 1999/02/07

Subject: Re: Why Kari Kauffman Is A Bald Faced Liar

  Reply to author
  |
  Forward
  | Print
  | View thread
  | Show original
  | Report this message
  | Find messages by this author
  

In article <10895-36BDF06A...@newsd-141.iap.bryant.webtv.net>,
KariMa...@webtv.net (Kari Kauffman) wrote:

> Well paul, I'm back. You gave me a bit of a fright which I am sure is
> easy to see to anyone that read my last post directed to you. But to
> paraphrase The Boss "You may bend me, but try to break me, you'll find
> that aint so easy to do".
> ...........................................................................
> I have never been in a fight in the 'real' world. Never hit or been hit
> in anger. I am new to newsgroup posting, having posted only here and in
> one other newsgroup.

But not new to lying, we see.

(Dawson's Creek, a show made for girls like me

> :)(yeah, I am blond,wanta make something of it : ) Have lurked here for
> months. But unlike you I do not live my life in newsgroups.

And that is relevant, How?

If you want

> to call me a 'newbi' , well, since I'm not even sure that's how to spell
> it... In my very first post to CSY2K I called you...well the nicest was
> "a bully".

And then you began lying.

Perhaps had I started differently we may have enjoyed a

> polite exchange of ideas, agree to disagree and all that rot. But we
> shall never know, shall we, and that is my fault. Not yours.
> ........................................................................... Why
> am I back? Because a number of people sent me private emails that
> said....Paul is harmless and you can't drive paul crazier then he
> already is and paul's not a bad guy, this is just his style and hey,
> don't worry we all put our foot in mouth and hang in there and hope to
> see you back ect.ect. I believe paul, we both owe those people a big
> thank you. They didn't trash you, ( well only 1) and they didn't really
> support me except to say ...you have nothing to fear and stick around.
> Now I hope and do not think that this sort of generalized quoting is bad
> manners. If so...Ha,Ha, I paraphrased, so there

But you stiil have yet to explain your lying, little girl.

> ...........................................................................
> So, is this new and nicer KK? Not a chance BOZO, just a wee bit wiser
> and a lot more focused. If I say it, it will because I mean it 100%.
> Not because I allowed an infantile over the hill failure
> wannabe-heard-so-bad-it-hurts PSYCHOPATH to get under my skin.

Still failing to adress the issues, eh, little girl?

There I

> go again, a misquote. Forgive me paul, the word your OWN MOTHER uses is
> PHCHOTIC.

That is 'psychotic'. And I have never been the least bit concerned about what
anyone else thinks.

Who told me that... YOU DID PAULIE BOY. As in "even my own

> mother thinks I'm "PHYCHOTIC". Paul is this why you believe that she
> and your siblings deserve to die?

Get the context straigh moron. I said that people who were WARNED and then DO
NOTHING 'deserve' the consequences of their actions. That applies equallt tp
persons related to me and those not related to me. It applies to everyone.

If you are warned, and you do noting, then you deserve the consequences of
your actions.

I mean, my dear old mum once told me I

> needed "a bit more practice on my calculus" and boy, I was miffed for a
> good 2 or 3 minutes. Or am I a liar paul, as you have called me so many
> times?

I have not merely 'called' you one. I have proven it by posting you own words.
You are a liar.

Try this...go to the N.J. Bergen Record, Sunday, Nov. 1st,

> 1998, Title is "Some survival outfitters fan the flames of panic." By
> Louis Lavell. Direct quote. By paulie boy. ( gee, I hope you really
> are harmless or I am in deep )
> ........................................................................... So
> paulie, how are my facts this time. ( we'll all wait while you go change
> your soiled shorts )
> ...........................................................................
> Now fair is fair, so let's point out some mistakes I made in that post
> you reference at the start of this thread.

Yes, please do address your mistakes. But there are so many of them, I think
we may not have enough time or space.

> 1) I didn't think you had enough stones ( that is rocks in the head) to
> really post it. You proved me wrong, since I had said you would not in
> public... boy, my face is red.

'Stones'? What stones does it take for you to lie and then for me to post YOUR
words proving you are a liar?

> 2) From a close reading of the text it seems I did a bit of reading
> between the lines or in truth...recalling your so oft stated positions
> in some 2300 posts to CSY2K. ( this week alone)

And that is what all liars call their lies "Reading between the lines. They
do not apologize for their lies they excuse them by calling it something
inoccuous. You are a liar. A bald faced liar.

( paul this is called

> a JOKE, don't quote those figures)

No, it is not a joke. You are a liar excusing your lies after the fact as a
'joke'. The only 'joke' here, is you. You are a liar.

Read carefully paul, I DID NOT SAY

> AT ANY TIME YOU SAID THOSE 3 POINTS, ( I am typing as slow as I can
> so that you can read this at your normal speed ) rather I said "paul
> made it 100% clear to me that;...".

My return mail makes not such things clear at all and then you made up a bunch
of insane crap and LIED through your teeth. You are a liar.

This paul is called r e a d i

> n g , now I know you can read as you have said so many times with
> pride " my thousands of hours of reading on Y2K". Oh, you say that was
> 1 single weather report ....why didn't you say so. You make so much more
> sence now.

What is 'sence'?

> 3) You do say (sic) people that will not listen to you deserve
> everything they have coming.

No. I have never said that if people do not listen to *ME* they get what they
deserve. I have said that if they have been WARNED to prepare and do nothing,
they get what they deserve.

Note the lack of quote marks paulie, I

> paraphrased you.

Yes, and other times that you have 'paraphrased' me you have LIED, calling it
'reading between the lines. You are a liar.

I am really attempting to be exact here paul, as I know

> any slight word, letter, or even a period out of place causes you to
> roll up into that fetal position and well, with soiled shorts you could
> really make a boo-boo on the floor.
> 4) The 'if not prepared for TEOTWAWKI" part. I plead your well known and
> oft stated public position on the subject.
> 5) The DIE! DIE! DIE! and ROTFLMAO.....come on, we all know that is a
> trademark paul milne exclusive catch phrase.

If it is my 'trademark, LIAR, then post the place where I wrote it. You are a
liar, once again. You confuse your OWN mischaracterizations of my views with
my actual views and then , you LIE. You are a liar.

> ...........................................................................
> Last but not least, paul...your "poor aged mother" ...you say "you no
> longer give a rat's a##" and "deserve everything that they (your mother
> and siblings are the they in this quote) have coming"

After having spent over a year providing the evidence that leads to the
conclusion that preparations are necessary and having the other parties
respond with laughter, dersion and lies, Yes, I no longer give a rat's ass
about what happens to them. They are rsponsible for the consequences of their
own actions. They have made their own beds and now they must lie in them.

> ...........................................................................
> Paul, while I do not feel the word " Liar" should have been directed my
> way,

Of course not. I specifically posted you BALD FACED LIE and you repudiate it
by saying it was a mere reading between the lines. Like all good, or in your
case, BAD liars, you refuse to apologize for you lies even when caught red
handed. You are an unprincipalled unscrupulous liar.

I can not then refer to you in such a manner.

Of course you can't. I have not lied about you.

Rather, are we not

> just two people in search of the truth, each of us far short of
> perfection?

No. You are a bleeding liar. Truth is of no interest to you at all.

One of our few differences is that I, unlike you paul, LOVE

> MY MOTHER AND WOULD GLADLY STEP IN FRONT OF A BULLET FOR HER.

Perhaps you are just too stupid to understand. When you warn someone of a
danger and they laugh in your face and ridicule the notion that there is any
danger at all, there is no more to say.

Please tell me what that has to do with loving your mother or not. One can
love their mother and yet, be placed in a position where there is nothing
more that can be done for her because of her extreme ignorance on the
subject. That is nothing more than pure denial.

> Go in peace...(please don't kill me) ...~~~KARI

At any rate, you are still a manifest and pathetic liar, and an excuse ridden
and unapologetic one at that.

Paul Milne
If you live within five miles of a 7-11, you're toast.

-----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==----------
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own

Reply to author Forward