Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp
From: alex goldman <he...@spamm.er>
Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2005 20:00:29 -0700
Local: Fri, Jun 24 2005 11:00 pm
Subject: Re: ILC 2005: Microsoft Demands Surrender, CL Says It Has Not Yet Begun to Fight
Greg Menke wrote: http://pdcbloggers.net/Question_and_Answer/PNL02/Patrick_Dussud.category > Kenny Tilton <ktil...@nyc.rr.com> writes: >> This correspondent's chin hit the floor when he realized this speaker >> Mr. Dussud was favored with one of the closing plenary sessions of the > Its the inevitable refrain from people not actually trying to do ILC2005's web site, it made me glad I wasn't there. At least half of what I saw was either crapware, or peddleware, or reware. Reware is something that's already been built a dozen times, but presented as brand new and innovative. Lisp copiled to .NET? There are a dozen of those that compile to JVM and/or .NET. Strictly typed Lisp?! - ML. Strictly typed Lisp compiled to .NET? - SML.NET (sp?) and F#. (I'm sure I've just offended a bunch of people, but hey, there's a 50% You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| ||||||||||||||