Description:
Discussion about LISP.
|
|
|
LOOP question
|
| |
I don't know if the implementation of LOOP is standard across implementations, and I'm wondering about possible dynamic scoping issues across implementations. Given the following example: (defparameter *foo* nil) (defun print-foo () (print *foo*)) (defun test () (loop for *foo* from 1 to 10 do (print-foo)))... more »
|
|
xmlisp problems
|
| |
Hi, I have the example code working with windows/slime/sbcl 1.0.13/xmlisp v2.3 but when I pull in an RSS feed (using Drakma) it looks like the 2nd line: <?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/news_rss.xsl"?> Isn't properly handled. The example RSS file does not have this line. Is there a solution for this?... more »
|
|
ParenScript and LOOP
|
| |
Does anyone know if the LOOP macro in CL works with ParenScript? Lemonodor has an example of a do-loop working here: [link] but I think I like the LOOP macro now heh. -Rudolf
|
|
#! /usr/local/bin/lisp ?
|
| |
This is a kind of a follow up to my previous post about executable form of a Lisp program. When I write a Perl script and include "#! /usr/bin/perl" as the first line, I can chmod it to 755 and run it like "perl ./script.plx". Can I do the same with a Lisp script? If so, is there any kind of documentation on it?... more »
|
|
Cons cell archaic!?
|
| |
How? Is there anything wrong with the concept? I thought it was so easy to parse the S-expressions because of it. Is this really a problem for Lisp or this is more of a non-Lisper automatic reaction to something he is not used to? How would the implementation of a Lisp without a using cons look like?... more »
|
|
tablizer and tables/database + procedural vs lisp/oo/other
|
| |
tablizer says as one programs oo you "re invent" the database in code often far mroe inefficiently thatn the "team" of a relational db +procedural language. Is this division of labor inevitable? Will a "dumb" langauge like tcl and a database like postgresql when skillyfully combined always outperform a lisp based framework... more »
|
|
|