Google Groups Home
Help | Sign in
complex dependencies
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  2 messages - Collapse all
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
emanuel  
View profile
 More options Feb 8, 9:29 am
From: emanuel <emanuel.bu...@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2008 06:29:14 -0800 (PST)
Local: Fri, Feb 8 2008 9:29 am
Subject: complex dependencies
Great idea, but it is useless for complex projects.  We have a project
consisting of roughly 30,000 classes.  I opened up a package
containing only 50 classes; 10 minutes later I am still staring at
this colorful display of squares with a black spot in the middle...
still twitching every 10 seconds or so.

It would be nice to be able adjust how fine-grained the contents are..
for example, show package dependencies only.  Should I open up my
org.acme.order package that contains 200 classes (which clearly can't
be displayed in any useful manner), it should automatically reduce
it's granularity and display org.acme.order only, and filter out the
classes.


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Klaus Wuestefeld  
View profile
 More options Feb 9, 9:22 pm
From: "Klaus Wuestefeld" <klauswuestef...@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2008 00:22:11 -0200
Local: Sat, Feb 9 2008 9:22 pm
Subject: Re: [Byecycle] complex dependencies
Yes.

After a long time, I am working on byecycle again. Slowly though.

An idea is to be able to drill out to packages and projects (very
important) and to drill in to methods and fields within a class (nice
to have).

With that, I think we can eliminate the package dependencies Byecycle
shows today and all graphs will have less nodes to show.

See you, Klaus.

On Feb 8, 2008 12:29 PM, emanuel <emanuel.bu...@gmail.com> wrote:


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
End of messages
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2008 Google