"What did you think of Roshi's talk today?" one of them asked. "When he talked about true and false practice, I thought that was kind of dualistic, wasn't it?"
"Ah," said the second, "but your even saying that is dualistic itself, don't you see?"
"Look who's talking," said the third. "I'm glad I'm not dualistic like you guys!"
dmch...@gmail.com wrote: > Three Zen students came out of a Dharma talk.
> "What did you think of Roshi's talk today?" one > of them asked. "When he talked about true and > false practice, I thought that was kind of > dualistic, wasn't it?"
> "Ah," said the second, "but your even saying that > is dualistic itself, don't you see?"
> "Look who's talking," said the third. "I'm glad > I'm not dualistic like you guys!"
I'll give you a better example.
This story is pointless, because it points at itself. I'm glad I'm not dualistic like this story and case.
>> Three Zen students came out of a Dharma talk. >> "What did you think of Roshi's talk today?" one >> of them asked. "When he talked about true and >> false practice, I thought that was kind of >> dualistic, wasn't it?" >> "Ah," said the second, "but your even saying that >> is dualistic itself, don't you see?" >> "Look who's talking," said the third. "I'm glad >> I'm not dualistic like you guys!"
> I'll give you a better example. > This story is pointless, because it points at itself. > I'm glad I'm not dualistic like this story and case.
In the 'Not-Two' are no separate things, yet all things are included. The enlightened of all times and places have all entered into this truth.
On Sat, 08 Jan 2005 07:30:53 +1300, leonard <m...@cgl-os.org> wrote: >dmch...@gmail.com wrote: >> Three Zen students came out of a Dharma talk.
>> "What did you think of Roshi's talk today?" one >> of them asked. "When he talked about true and >> false practice, I thought that was kind of >> dualistic, wasn't it?"
>> "Ah," said the second, "but your even saying that >> is dualistic itself, don't you see?"
>> "Look who's talking," said the third. "I'm glad >> I'm not dualistic like you guys!"
>I'll give you a better example.
>This story is pointless, because it points at itself. >I'm glad I'm not dualistic like this story and case.
Right, a wiener of less than 2 inches. Anything else, skeez?
>>>"What did you think of Roshi's talk today?" one >>>of them asked. "When he talked about true and >>>false practice, I thought that was kind of >>>dualistic, wasn't it?"
>>>"Ah," said the second, "but your even saying that >>>is dualistic itself, don't you see?"
>>>"Look who's talking," said the third. "I'm glad >>>I'm not dualistic like you guys!"
>>I'll give you a better example.
>>This story is pointless, because it points at itself. >>I'm glad I'm not dualistic like this story and case.
> Right, a wiener of less than 2 inches. Anything else, skeez?
