BUFFY THE VAMPIRE SLAYER "Primeval," by David Fury
review by David Hines rating: **
Well, thank Ghod *that's* over with.
The Initiative is dead. Its men are either dead or being debriefed and sworn to secrecy; its underground headquarters will be filled with concrete. "Burn it down, gentlemen," says the Man In Charge. "Burn it down and salt the earth." That sounds about right to me, even if I wonder how they're going to handle the order on that. Do they burn it down first, then fill it with concrete and salt the earth; or burn it down, salt the earth, and fill it with concrete; or fill it with concrete, salt the earth, and then burn it; or fill it with concrete, burn it, and then salt the earth; or...
Of course, it doesn't matter; he's speaking metaphorically. Though I have to admit the sentiment isn't a bad idea, and would go so far as to suggest they salt the earth twice, for good measure. If you're guessing I've hated the whole Initiative storyline -- you're right! And you obviously haven't been reading my reviews for the season up to this point, or you wouldn't have to guess. The Initiative has been an incredibly lame plotline, with a lame introduction and lame development. All it has been missing is a lame capper -- but no more. "Primeval" fills the void.
It's not that David Fury doesn't try; he does, and makes a fairly valiant attempt for a man who's been tossed a big ball of suck. But he has two things going against him. First off, he's been tossed a big ball of suck. Fury's got to wrap up a storyline that's ill-conceived and dull, dispatch a major villain who (despite being well-acted) never made much of an impression, and resolve character conflicts that were never really explored much, or at all well, in the first place. There really isn't a way for him to win here. Even if he busts his tuchis, reaches deep, and rises to the occasion with a spectacular diving catch and throw to the plate, there's no escaping the fact that what lands in his mitt is still going to be a big ball of suck. Even if Fury does a bang-up job, the result is not going to thrill.
The second problem... is that Fury *doesn't* do a bang-up job.
Oh, he does okay for a man who's got a big ball of suck to work with. He gets off some good lines and some very cute bits; he writes the characters as fairly smart; he lets Xander show some life. Unfortunately, except for the last, all of that is confined to the first half of the show, after which the episode is as lame as the season arcs it wraps up. Some of this is only partly Fury's fault; the "Slayerettes being driven apart" angle has been done so ineffectively over the season that the writers have had to hammer it on in the past couple of episodes to let us know that yes, they were *trying* to do something, and they hadn't just forgotten quality screen time for the supporting characters *really.* Accordingly, Fury doesn't have much choice but to make his resolution of the mess clumsy, hammering the plotline home even as he resolves it. The characters saying there have been problems substitutes for the problems' adequate development onscreen; this is essentially the writers saying to the audience, "Look, guys, we were *trying* to do something here, dammit." Yes, I think they were; but they failed rather impressively, and rubbing our noses in it now doesn't help.
Some of the problems with the episode, however, *are* Fury's fault (or Joss Whedon's). For instance, that far-too-on-the-nose conversation takes place... where? If you've seen it, you know, but if you haven't, you won't believe it: halfway down an elevator shaft! And not just any elevator shaft, either. No, this particular heart-to-heart takes place in the elevator shaft that leads to the headquarters of the Initiative, and our heroes have this touching chat *while they are rappelling down the wall.*
You think that breaking into a top-secret military facility is something best done with some degree of speed and stealth, and that it's probably not a good idea to take time out for a Heartfelt Conversation while you're doing it, especially if you're breaking in through an entrance that you know is heavily monitored and is in fact THE FRONT DOOR? Not our heroes! They're actually *surprised* to find several soldiers waiting for them with zap guns just inside the Initiative. (They are, however, still smarter than the Initiative, especially MacNamara, who is written in full "military moron" cliche mode.)
There's a lot of that kind of thing in the episode: bits here and there that get a couple of points for cuteness, which are then outright obliterated by large penalties for utter stupidity. A particular favorite of mine is the latest bit of chips-all-around. Yes, you knew I'd get to him sooner or later: everybody's favorite commando, Rank Sweatsock! It's a kick watching his implanted chip force him to obey as Adam tells him to sit, stay, speak, shut up, in part because I've wished I could make Stiff Crotchpole shut up on pretty much a regular basis since his inception. (Hey, can we get one of those chips for Buffy, too?) But then, of course, as we've seen a billion mind-controlled heroes do in a billion movies and TV shows and comic books before, Bland Coldcuts overcomes his programming enough to struggle against it. Although ordered to remain still, he torturously reaches for a nearby shard of glass, cuts a hole in his chest, reaches in *with his fingers,* and yanks the chip out. There's a MAN for you, folks!
How much of a man is he? We're told that the chip in Lance Guardrail's chest is "on the thoracic nerve." I'm guessing they mean the long thoracic nerve. The good news is that it doesn't ennervate anything absolutely critical -- it goes to serratus anterior, which originates on the ribs and serves to stabilize and pronate the scapula -- so that even if he rips the nerve right out, the worst Trip Faceplant is going to wind up with is a winged shoulderblade. The bad news is that the long thoracic nerve runs deep to pectoralis major and minor. To get to it, Chip Rockpile (if his anatomy matched normal human, which, based on where he cut and probed on the show, it doesn't) would have to cut *through* both muscles, stick a couple fingers in the hole, widen it, feel around, find the blood-slicked chip, get a grip on it -- and if there's anyone who's not feeling faint at the mere prospect, savvy this: not only does he rip the sucker out, he does NOT keel over in shock from the trauma and attendant blood loss. No, *he stands up and fights.* (Anybody feeling nostalgic for the days when we only had to extend our suspicion of disbelief to the honest-to-goodness supernatural?)
Anyway, the fights are good; there's certainly a hell of a lot of action and stunts, and most of it is pretty impressive, especially considering TV's limited time and budget. There are some directing flubs; several times, especially when the action is in a wide shot, director James Contner's framing cramps the style and makes it look as if less is going on than it actually is. He does include some decent long and medium shots of one-on-one fights, though, especially in the final battle between Buffy and Adam, which at its best lets us see Sophia Crawford getting off some of the tastiest moves she's had all season. At its worst... well...
Conceptually, it bites. To give Buffy the wherewithal she needs to defeat Adam, the Slayerettes perform a ritual that gives her their combined powers (Giles's knowledge, Willow's magick, Xander's spirit) and throws in all the mojo that ever juiced all the Slayers just for good measure. The ritual boosts Buffy's strength and speed tremendously, and also gives her the useful power to evaporate bullets with very pretty MATRIX-style effects, and the useful ability to transmute larger missiles into doves, as well as some other nifty things. Plus, when she rips out Adam's uranium core, she's able to fold space-time to make it wink out of existence. (Obviously, Xander has been holding back on us.) Just in case anyone was doubting it, you see, *Buffy does need her friends, because she is stronger and more firm of purpose when the Slayerettes are united.* The theme isn't just hammered mercilessly, as in the elevator shaft; it's beaten to death.
Still, the ham-handedness has a certain twisted symmetry to it. After all, Joss Whedon has remarked a number of times that the WB's CHARMED survives by doing riffs on BUFFY; in a warped way, it's sort of amusing to see this limping season of BUFFY returning the favor.
(At least until Spike returns a few seconds later, and the Slayerettes, who *know* full well what he's been up to, and that the *only* reason he's doing anything to help them is so he can live to kill again someday, decide that because he saved their lives solely to avoid being staked, they can't rightly stake him -- oh, *ghod.*)
The good news: it's over. And in a sad, fitting way, this season's story arc has been given the send-off it deserves. A few sparkles. Some good performances. A good chunk of sheer stupidity. But mostly, ultimately, *cripplingly*... "Primeval" is simply *lame.*
Joss Whedon doesn't need the remaining episode this season for a coda. He needs it to apologize.
> (At least until Spike returns a few seconds later, and the Slayerettes, > who *know* full well what he's been up to, and that the *only* reason > he's doing anything to help them is so he can live to kill again someday, > decide that because he saved their lives solely to avoid being staked, > they can't rightly stake him -- oh, *ghod.*)
My impression of that scene was that they didn't stake him because at that point, after the oh-so-dangerous-but-cool spell they had just done, they were too exhausted to care. Then again, they immediately went out and saved the lives of a bunch of soldiers by killing a bunch of demons, so that doesn't work. Okay, I know there must have been some kind of logic here... They didn't stake him because, after taking over Jonathan's role in _The Matrix_ in their fight with Adam, putting a pointy piece of wood in the heart of an undead shell-of-a-loser would just be too anticlimactic. Yeah, that works.
> The good news: it's over. And in a sad, fitting way, this season's story > arc has been given the send-off it deserves. A few sparkles. Some good > performances. A good chunk of sheer stupidity. But mostly, ultimately, > *cripplingly*... "Primeval" is simply *lame.*
While I've enjoyed this season's episodes much more than you have, I'm forced to agree with you about the treatment of the arc. I've loved, or at least really liked, every episode that hasn't been "Where the Wild Things Are" or "A New Man," but I can't say I've looked forward to where the plot was going. I haven't *cared*. Haven't had the least little bit of suspense, just a little twinge of curiosity about whether or not they'd give an adequate explanation of the Initiative's motives in creating a monster to destroy the human race in order to save it or whatever all that was about, and of course they didn't. (Why did the Man In Charge say they'd had 40% casualties as if they'd wanted their guys to live? Wasn't the whole POINT that Maggie'd wanted Adam to kill a bunch of beings for their parts?)
I have to say that Adam as a villain impressed me as much as The Master in first season. Didn't like that guy either.
> Joss Whedon doesn't need the remaining episode this season for a coda. He > needs it to apologize.
Or at least give us something to talk about over the summer. (Xander lied. Full of Grace. The WB folks are morons for postponing G2. What oh what can top those classics?)
-- CB
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Science is not the way to find answers to all our questions. Science is a way to find better questions.
In article <NFKU4.15805$Y4.65...@typhoon2.san.rr.com>, hrad...@mib.org
(David Hines) wrote: > BUFFY THE VAMPIRE SLAYER > "Primeval," by David Fury
> review by David Hines > rating: **
> Well, thank Ghod *that's* over with.
Yep. Couldn't agree more...
> ...Yes, you knew I'd get to > him sooner or later: everybody's favorite commando, Rank Sweatsock! It's > a kick watching his implanted chip force him to obey as Adam tells him to > sit, stay, speak, shut up, in part because I've wished I could make Stiff > Crotchpole shut up on pretty much a regular basis since his inception. > (Hey, can we get one of those chips for Buffy, too?)
Don't forget Willow! (Or Spike, for that matter...)
> Just in case > anyone was doubting it, you see, *Buffy does need her friends, because she > is stronger and more firm of purpose when the Slayerettes are united.* The > theme isn't just hammered mercilessly, as in the elevator shaft; it's > beaten to death.
I'll probably cover this more in my Year-End Review, but wasn't anyone *appalled* by this turn of events?!
I mean, for all intents and purposes, Buffy *cheated* to beat Adam!
Yeah, that's right Folks! You don't need any real "Slayer powers" to do your Slayer duty! That's right! All you need is a couple of friends who are going to help you *cheat* to defeat your Mortal Enemy! Ain't that grand, Kids?!
Maybe it's just me, but this "final cheating" finished deflating what was already a lackluster finale for me.
(And don't get me started on the "battle" shots which looked cheap - like they were filmed on a Universal Studios backlot! And to think people complained about GD2. At least those battle sequences *worked*!)
> Still, the ham-handedness has a certain twisted symmetry to it. After > all, Joss Whedon has remarked a number of times that the WB's CHARMED > survives by doing riffs on BUFFY; in a warped way, it's sort of amusing to > see this limping season of BUFFY returning the favor.
Except that "Charmed" does it better. Actually, "Charmed" does *both* things better...
> The good news: it's over.
The bad news? I think this is just the begining! (But I hope to Ghu I am wrong...)
-- Ian J. Ball | "I'm not going to have somebody probing my mind, Ph.D. Chemist, | looking for things that aren't there!" & TV lover | - Tricia Dennison McNeil, CBS's Y&R ib...@socal.rr.com | http://members.aol.com/IJBall/WWW/TV.html
In article <39237DE9.917AF...@erols.com>, "C. Barrans"
<cbarr...@erols.com> wrote: > Or at least give us something to talk about over the summer. (Xander > lied. Full of Grace. The WB folks are morons for postponing G2. What > oh what can top those classics?)
Oh, I think we know what this summer's classics will be: "Did Season #4 Suck as Badly as I Think It Did?!" and "Is 'Buffy" Finished (as a Good Show)?"
Ladies and Gentlemen, Start Your Engines! <vroom> <vroom>
-- Ian J. Ball | "I'm not going to have somebody probing my mind, Ph.D. Chemist, | looking for things that aren't there!" & TV lover | - Tricia Dennison McNeil, CBS's Y&R ib...@socal.rr.com | http://members.aol.com/IJBall/WWW/TV.html
In article <iball***death-to-SPAM***-697312.22422817052...@news-server.socal.rr.com>, Ian J. Ball <iball***death-to-SPAM...@socal.rr.com> wrote:
>I'll probably cover this more in my Year-End Review, but wasn't anyone >*appalled* by this turn of events?!
>I mean, for all intents and purposes, Buffy *cheated* to beat Adam!
While a lot of the time I don't agree with David Hines, his comments are always intelligible and articulate.
This, on the other hand, is just from outer space. "Cheated"? Saving the world from techno-Frankenstein's-monsters is a game? Someone has set up rules and is keeping score?
>Yeah, that's right Folks! You don't need any real "Slayer powers" to do >your Slayer duty! That's right! All you need is a couple of friends who >are going to help you *cheat* to defeat your Mortal Enemy! Ain't that >grand, Kids?!
They thought of a way to beat Adam, and they used it. It seems little different to me from using a rocket launcher to blow up the Judge -- did you object to that too?
You can call it a deus ex machina. You can say it was a heavy-handed use of theme. You can note that it weakens future storylines by creating something that can handle problems too easily. People have raised all these objections, and with some truth.
But saying they were *cheating*...??
-- David Goldfarb <*>|"Understanding is a three-edged sword." goldf...@ocf.berkeley.edu | aster...@slip.net | -- Babylon 5, "Deathwalker" goldf...@csua.berkeley.edu |
> Ian J. Ball <iball***death-to-SPAM...@socal.rr.com> wrote: > >I'll probably cover this more in my Year-End Review, but wasn't anyone > >*appalled* by this turn of events?!
> >I mean, for all intents and purposes, Buffy *cheated* to beat Adam!
> This, on the other hand, is just from outer space. "Cheated"? Saving > the world from techno-Frankenstein's-monsters is a game? Someone has > set up rules and is keeping score?
Wow, you don't get it so it's from "outer space"? Nice...
Look, The Slayer is supposed to be an honorable warrior who beats Evil in a clean fight. What she did by using trickery and magic to win this fight was not honorable. By doing this, she devalued The Slayer in my book.
-- Ian J. Ball | "I'm not going to have somebody probing my mind, Ph.D. Chemist, | looking for things that aren't there!" & TV lover | - Tricia Dennison McNeil, CBS's Y&R ib...@socal.rr.com | http://members.aol.com/IJBall/WWW/TV.html
> In article <8g0823$ng...@agate.berkeley.edu>, goldf...@OCF.Berkeley.EDU > (David Goldfarb) wrote:
> Wow, you don't get it so it's from "outer space"? Nice...
> Look, The Slayer is supposed to be an honorable warrior who beats Evil in > a clean fight. What she did by using trickery and magic to win this fight > was not honorable. By doing this, she devalued The Slayer in my book.
So was it honorable for her to trick Luke in "The Harvest?" How about the vamps she back-stabbed or beheaded when they weren't aware of her presence? Using a rocket launcher on The Judge? Working with Spike? Fooling Faith? The times Willow has cast a spell to assist the fight?
Look, she's the Slayer, not a Samurai. She doesn't follow the code of Bushido, she follows the code of Wining Any Way I Can.
-- Mike Zeares "From day one, Buffy only resorts to thought after she has established that violence won't work." -- William George Ferguson
>> In article ><iball***death-to-SPAM***-697312.22422817052...@news-server.socal.rr.com>, >> Ian J. Ball <iball***death-to-SPAM...@socal.rr.com> wrote: >> >I'll probably cover this more in my Year-End Review, but wasn't anyone >> >*appalled* by this turn of events?!
>> >I mean, for all intents and purposes, Buffy *cheated* to beat Adam!
>> This, on the other hand, is just from outer space. "Cheated"? Saving >> the world from techno-Frankenstein's-monsters is a game? Someone has >> set up rules and is keeping score?
>Wow, you don't get it so it's from "outer space"? Nice...
>Look, The Slayer is supposed to be an honorable warrior who beats Evil in >a clean fight. What she did by using trickery and magic to win this fight >was not honorable. By doing this, she devalued The Slayer in my book.
And here I thought you were referring to the *writer's* cheating.
Are you serious about this? Because I, a relative Buffy neophyte, have never gotten the impression, from either the episode synopses or the episodes I have seen, that there was any such idea of "honorable warrior".
Jammer Jim Roberts-Miller -- Texas A&M '89, '91 "Is there in Truth no Beauty?" "Of course, you do not have to go to the moon to find cold, dark, and inhospitable...conditions. Much of Canada will do." -- the Economist http://www.mindspring.com/~jammerjim/jimpg01.html
>Look, The Slayer is supposed to be an honorable warrior who
beats Evil in a clean fight. What she did by using trickery and magic to win this fight >was not honorable. By doing this, she devalued The Slayer in my book.
No offense, Ian, but that's bullshit.
Buffy has always used trickery and magic against her opponents [the ruse in Enemies to smoke out Faith; tricking Luke in the Harvest; the clouding spell in Zeppo; even the little run-and-stumble technique she uses against average, everyday vamps, pretending she's an ordinary girl so they'll chase her] and I've never seen that as being dishonorable. She's doing what it takes to win.
She has never been overly concerned with "honor" and I, for one, am damn glad of it. It's a stupid concept that says you can't fight your dirtiest when someone's trying to kill you/become a snakedemon/suck the world into hell, etc.
victoria p. the dishonorable Miss July
--
"Cunnilingus and psychiatry brought us to this!" Tony Soprano, _The Sopranos_
* Sent from RemarQ http://www.remarq.com The Internet's Discussion Network * The fastest and easiest way to search and participate in Usenet - Free!