Google Groups Home Help | Sign in
Message from discussion Case study: Kathleen Wilson
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
Bernie  
View profile
 More options Aug 2 1997, 3:00 am
Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology, soc.culture.german, alt.support.ex-cult
From: b...@arcadis.be (Bernie)
Date: 1997/08/02
Subject: Re: Case study: Kathleen Wilson

mart...@islandnet.com (Martin Hunt) wrote in article
<TKv4zMdlgAsc09...@islandnet.com>:

>In article <3476521b.496634...@snews.zippo.com>, b...@arcadis.be (Bernie) wrote:
>>n...@petermc.demon.co.uk (Peter McDermott) wrote in article <B007E49596681B8...@0.0.0.0>:
>>>So it isn't true that these people are discriminated against.
>>>The truth is that their continued involvement in the cult
>>>shows that they are either conscious of these crimes and
>>>therefore corrupt, or unconscious of them, and therefore
>>>stupid. Either quality is enough to reasonably debar someone
>>>from such employment.
>>Do you really think that every members are willfully
>>participating in the corrupt actions of the COS? Is it your
>>experience that Scientologists are usually stupid people? What
>>about ex-Scn? Do think Dennis Erlich, Martin Hunt, Monica
>>Pignotti, Joe Harrington, are stupid people?
>Bernie, you clueless asshole, there was no "continued
>involvement" on my part.

The Bavarian measure doesn't speak about "continued
involvement", only whether one is or not a Scientologist, or
using LRH tech.

>I left. Why don't this morons
>who have *seen* the facts leave, also? I'll put my vote
>on massive stupidity or wilful ignorance. They've been
>*told* what Hubbard's grades in school were, and they
>still quack quack quack on about how wonderful "Study
>tech" is. They've *read* BFM, some of them, and they're
>*still* in the fucking cult!

They have other reasons, other interpretations and other
circumstances than yours or mine. This doesn't make them more or
less stupid.

>I call that fucking clueless! Stupid! Moronic! If reading
>Atack's book and Miller's book and all the documents on the
>web about overboarding, Hubbard' rampant drug use, Lisa's
>death, and a million other things doesn't crack their
>mind, there's nothing there to crack.

Most of these are so full of distorted information and so full
of irrational reactions, such as the one you display in this
post, that it does not have any credibility in their eyes.

>My plea was never related to intelligence; it was related
>to ignorance.

You can be ignorant while intelligent. Actually, I consider that
the highest form of intelligence is to be aware of one's
ignorance, something you are obviously far to achieve. You are
so full of your many absolute certainties that it often makes
you sound stupid, something which I don't think you are.

>They fucking lied to me about every little
>thing, and it was stupid of me not to see though their
>lies as easily as I see through yours and Diane's and the
>other assholes here

Which is a good illustration of the mistaken way you assess your
experience with the cult. Your arguments against Diane have been
amongst the most silly ones (apart those from the GluGlu Bird) I
was given to read. And as far as I go, can you quote a single
lie I made? Or is it just one of your many generalizations and
near insane rantings fit?

>who can't see the forest for the trees,
>but it is *infinitely* more stupid of these cultists to
>stay in the fucking cult after *learning* the truth, *seeing*
>it everywhere, and *still* not getting a fucking clue.

They don't see "the truth", Martin. That's cultists who believe
they have *the* truth and that everyone else who don't think
along their way are stupid, mean, or deluded. Scieno just have a
different interpretations than those outside the group. But this
doesn't mean that it's a fixed and permanent viewpoint (unlike
many of the anti-cultists).

>Please quit misusing my name in this manner to oppose
>Peter;

I suggested that, as an ex-member currently posting, you may not
be stupid. Is that "misusing" your name? Oh, I am sorry.

And you really have a gall to complain about "abuses" of your
name, you who have no rest in constantly bringing Diane's name
through the mud of your delerious and childish depiction of her
and your numerous low level sexually based verbal abuses? Didn't
you ever have a good look at what *you* do? Or are you so
deluded that you are completely unaware of it?

>I've had it out with him long before you were here,
>and settled it in a lengthy and intelligent and honest debate...

This post doesn't leave place for an inch of doubt about that.

>something which does not happen on this newsgroup any more
>with stupid little fucks like you crawling about all over
>it.

Yea, people you can't easily dismiss or intimidate, who actually
argue with others and take issue on anti-cult member's
exaggerations, distortions and overall cultic behavior.
Annoying, eh? I understand how this must be a real frustration
for you and the likes of Erlich.

>Why don't you get your shit together, Bernie? You're fucked
>in the head by Scientology right now, today, this instant.

Really? On what are you basing yourself? Can you quote anything
I said that will demonstrate that? Or is it just some more
gratuitous assertions and wishful thinking of yours? No doubt a
most convincing illustration of "*learning* the truth, *seeing*
it everywhere". I am crushed.

>Why don't you kick that shit out of your head? Aren't you
>able to or what?

My head is considerably clearer than yours, Martin.

>Scientology is bullshit, Bernie; pure
>fucking bullshit. It's hollow, empty, soulless crap.

Oh, thank you, Martin. *Now* I understand.

>People who cling to it become hollow, shallow, empty and meaningless,

So you say.

>so chuck it the fuck out of your brain, or be fucked.

Don't I have an option?

>Incredibly sincerely,
>martin.

Sincerely, Martin. To step back an reflect somewhat on your many
sloppy beliefs and quick statements would do you an awful good,
and may even bring your credibility scale a bit higher in this
newsgroup. I am convinced you can do better than that.

>Following-up to yourself, you little puke? *Bad* sign. Bernie,
>take your vomit and your abuse of my name and shove it *deep*
>up your asshole, where it belongs, you sick little fuckwit.
>Digest this: <one-finger salute> And, please, don't forget to
>FOAD, asswipe.

LOL! Thanks, Martin. You really are my funny clown. I like you.

Bernie
--
Dianedroids. Tashbackolyte. Invisible party line buster.
Anti-anti-cultist. ARS critic's critic. Skripted scienobot. Cult
rah-rah.


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2008 Google