Google Groups Home Help | Sign in
Message from discussion COS's "Original Overt"?
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
telecon  
View profile
 More options Oct 31 1997, 3:00 am
Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology
From: tele...@dimensional.com (telecon)
Date: 1997/10/31
Subject: Re: COS's "Original Overt"?

In article <3459134B.4681@REMOVE_ME.seanet.com>, Paul
<pauldb@REMOVE_ME.seanet.com> wrote

:You must be reading a different newsgroup than I am.  I've heard no one
:claim that the *beliefs* are "awful".  I've seen a few people in a few
:postings point out that the Xenu story is rather silly, but I've also
:seen other people point out that stories from other religions are
:equally silly.

I would have to agree with this paragraph.  The xenu story is quite silly.

:I have seen quite a few people, including me, point out that some of the
:*policies* of the Church of Scientology[tm] are "awful", including the
:Introspection Rundown, the Purification Rundown, Fair Game, etc., but
:that is not the same things as *beliefs*.

These are not a matter of policy for idiots^H^H^H^H^H^H scientologists,
they are a matter of scripture as far as the clams are concerned.  It does
not matter to the clams that all of the shit that they consider scripture
are what started out as a scam and ended up the rabid ravings of a drunken
madman.


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2008 Google