Google Groups Home Help | Sign in
Message from discussion Is it true?
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
Wolf  
View profile
 More options May 21 1998, 3:00 am
Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology
From: Wolf <wolft...@micron.net>
Date: 1998/05/21
Subject: Re: Is it true?

Starshadow wrote:

> In article <35634BCD.1...@micron.net>, wolft...@micron.net says...
> > > they do follow ex-members that they fear
> > > enough around the world,

> > Other than  heresay, prove this.

>   Hey, I'm not in a court of law. I believe Stacy Young's post. She has
> credibility. You don't.

Of course I have credibility... just not with you. BTW, I'm not accusing
Stacey of lying, I'm merely suggesting she has edited the actual events
in whatever fashion she deemed appropriate to support her claims.

> > > that they do have world
> > > domination plans,

> > Hey... you're a subgenius droid aren't you?

>   There's that fabulous tek in action. You idiot, I'm a *witch*. Not a
> sub-genius. Not a droid, either.

Yikes! A *witch*! But hang in there Granny, if I'm an idiot then you
have to be a droid. Them's the rules.

> > > they do use the "confessional folders" to blackmail members

> > Prove it. Especially the *blackmail*

>   Hey, I've seen things posted on *this* newsgroup from people's
> confessional folders!  If you need help on this, do a Deja News search. I
> ain't doing your research for you, I have enough on my plate. Unlike you,
> I have a real life.

What you've seen are things posted on this ng that have been claimed to
be from peoples folders. Common sense (of which I have copious amounts)
would tell you that after millions of hours of auditing, somebody,
somewhere is bound to scan a few folders looking for dirt. It happens in
Law offices, psychiatric offices, doctors offices all the time. But to
make a point: *Scientology* does not utilize the confidental contents of
pc folders for blackmail.

> > > they do own some secret vaults that have their dead guru's writings

> > Hey... you're a subgenius droid aren't you? If you could prove this one
> > I'd send you a six pack.

>   Unless it's six pack of Dr. Pepper (Diet) I'm not interested. But again
> this has been posted.

Okay. I'll post this: Tilman Hauser is a direct genetic descendant of
Ghengis Khan, Martin Hunt is actually a plant - a strange hybrid of
pinto beans and basmati rice - and Starshadow is not really a witch,
she's a Loyal Officer. Using your logic it's all now true. Unless, of
course, you can prove otherwise.

> > > they do orchestrate hiring of PIs to harass,

> > 'orchestrate'? Is that a crafty way of saying you can't prove this?

>   Geeze, do you need a dictionary to understand words of more than two
> syllables?  I didn't stutter.

Well? Apparently you can't prove it. Except that 'it's been posted'.

<snip dead dog chat>

>   Yap, yap. The posters that have talked about this have some integrity,
> I have believed them. If you don't, that's your problem, not mine.

In other words, you can't prove it.

> > Starshadow... the only thing *in action* on this NG is yours and the
> > other ARS culties paranoia and conspiracy schemes.

>   Yeah, real paranoia. It isn't the critics who scream "German
> conspiracy" everytime a news article comes out that details abuses.
> Or is that Minton-German-evil-psyche-lord-Nazi conspiracy?? I forget,
> it's so hard to keep them straight.

The Minton-German-evil-psyche-lord-Nazi one is different than the
evil-deathcult-world-takeover-OSA-helicopter one. You gotta remember to
keep your conspiracies straight.

> > Hmmm. Well, you are a bigot, that is clear by not only your language,
> > but that of a good 25% of the Leadership of ARS.

>   Yeah, Wolf. I'm a bigot. I really hate cults which lock up people until
> they die. I want to see them stopped from killing any more people. I'm
> just such an eeevil bigot.

Me too. Thankfully no such cults exist in our fair land.

<snip>

>   Now that has been stated once or twice and then refuted by numerous
> people, some of them critics. I don't believe LRH was a child molester. A
> wife and child abuser, a bigamist, a paranoid shizophrenic, a liar, a
> sometime decent pulp-writer, charismatic and entertaining outside of his
> cult, that I'm sure of. I heard from his own lips that he started the
> whole thing as a scam. I guess that he was lying, though, or maybe I was
> lying and somehow all the people at Norwescon One were lying that heard
> him say the same thing.

Wow. At least he wasn't a child molester!

<snip>

> > > going into paroxisms(sp?) anytime someone lists their spam web pages and
> > > even links to them.

> > Squeeky wheel gets the grease.. that's what ol' Wolf advises.

> > >   This of course is Scientology in action.

It's the way of the world. That CofS employs the methods they do doesn't
make them Scientology methods. But it must smart to feel so
self-righteous and keep getting your collective butts kicked by them
terrible people.

> > >  Notice that Wolf calls a newsgroup a "cult" as though he could make a
> > > thinking person believe that all critics are somehow mind-controlled to
> > > believe terrible things about his favorite real UFO cult.

> > Okay, ya got me there. Strictly speaking, ARS is not a cult. But then
> > neither is CofS. But since ARS culties have deemed (and redefined) their
> > target as culties, then you get like treatment. There's also the fact
> > that ARS is gradually evolving into the very same thing it's main
> > speakers say they hate about Scientology. But since you're already a
> > cultie, you wouldn't have noticed.

>   Right, we are all in a cult. You know about as much of that as you do
> about me, hence you defining me as a "subgenius". Who do you think is
> *our* noble cult leader?  Xenu?  Minton?  The Evil Zombie Psyche Lords?

Right now Starshadow, there is a power struggle in the ARS Cult. Erlich
has seemingly lost ground because he can't get a job and Wollersheim has
been found out to be what many of us knew all along, an attention-mooch.
Tilman has fallen victim to the clam-meme virus and Rob has proven
steadily that he's too intelligent to buy into _all_ the rants and spew
of this cult. RVY and his bride are angling to fill the vacuum by
planning and staging daring GO type operations and rescuing fair maidens
in the nick of time, but who can trust a couple of ex-GO button men?
Barwell would love to be leader but he *plonks* anyone who says anything
that isn't exactly what he wants to hear. Henson has the smarts, but the
RTC left tread marks on his checkbook. I don't think you want the job...
so... that leaves Dave Bird, He's the only ARS cultie here who has
consistently been looney enough to dribble his garbage out in an
on-policy, 100% standard fashion. Plus there's the added bonus of his
giant beard and bohemian appearance. I vote for Dave!

>   Oh, well, at least we don't have to spend thousands to get rid of space
> cooties.

This from a *witch*? Pot=Kettle?

> > > read the ng long enough that while critics have and do criticize within
> > > their own ranks when they think anyone is wrong, and admit mistakes,

> > LOL!! Spelling mistakes sure. Hell, even a few grammer mistakes. But
> > mistakes? You're way under the ether.

>   Bullshit. You are lying. As usual.

Why would I lie? If I had any compassion (according to Monica P I don't)
my little feelings might be hurt by that remark. If I'm misinformed I'll
take it like a man. But calling me a liar proves nothing.

<snip>

> > > and that they never defend, they always attack.

> > Well, pass. It's policy. A good one too, evidenced by the fact that
> > nobody has ever forced them to answer any questions.

>   It sure makes showing their idiocy easier. Non-confront and all that.

I disagree. There's a world of difference between failing to confront
something and stonewalling. Witness our current President if you want to
observe a true master. It's effective, produces results and has been the
preferred weapon of our civilization since language evolved. You want
answers? They say nope. Now what ya gonna do? Shoot them? That's life.

> > You really are overwhelmed by your involvement in this cult.. Being on
> > the net hardly qualifies as involving the *whole world* in your
> > business. I know, those who have trouble getting attention in the
> > non-virtual world sometimes lose track of just how few people really
> > give a shit about them online too... but if you wanna think the world is
> > watching, who am I to de-program you?

>   yap yap. If it is so unimportant why the all the attention the cult
> pays critics??

I wish you ARS cultists would get it through your skulls... wgert,
gunny, whip and the rest aren't major assets of the CofS. They're
grunts. Foot soldiers. They don't know dick about what the RTC is up to.
The threat of any enemy can be determined by the quality of the assets
sent against it. Erlich, Henson, Wollersheim did, at one point, present
a threat. That's why bigger guns were brought into play. You guys get
wgert. Which shows how much impact ARS has had in the last four years.

> > >   We just don't like people being locked up until they die,
> > Well goddamnit Starshadow! I'd hurry up and book a ticket to Africa, SE
> > Asia, China or any number of places on our fair planet where people are
> > being locked up, starved, beaten, tortured and brutalized each and every
> > minute of the day. Are you a man (woman?) or a mouse? If you really
> > care, I mean really, as in this isn't just a diversion so you can pump
> > your own diminished ego up, then go find some real brutality and do
> > something about it. If not, then I guess you're just paying lip service
> > from a safe distance huh?

>   I don't happen to live in those places. I live in a country where this
> kind of thing is supposed to be illegal. And if you don't know anything
> about who I am or what I've done or what volunteer time I've served or
> who I may have assisted or fed or clothed, etc, then why should I tell
> you? I'm not here to bang my own drum, I'm here to stop your cult's
> criminal actions. You don't like that and you will try to claim anything
> nasty you can dig up on me. Go ahead. I don't care.

True. But I suspect you see my point. Demonizing Scn and falsely
creating a threat that doesn't exist does little or nothing if you
really intend to manipulate a change in the way they treat SO members.
This appears to be way too sophisticated for the ARS clam-crowd to
comprehend. I'll happily explain it though to anyone who cares to drop
the pretense of being the heroic saviours of our children and inspect
what is really going on inside CofS members heads.

> > >   If this is picketing campaign is so useless as Wolf likes to depict,
> > > why then are there so many fits about it on this ng?

> > Who has fits? I haven't seen any fits. WTF are you talking about?

>   Wgert, Justin, you, et al, getting your panties all in a knot.

Oooh. Wgert got upset... there's a stat for ya!

<snip Wolf's remarks about weight gain, pc's and Ho-Ho addiction>

>   I'm fat. So what?  Does this make me a bad person? Does it make anyone
> who is fat a bad person? I've noticed people of all sizes picketing. WTF
> does it have to do with anything except your own bigotry against fat
> people???

Actually I didn't know you were sporting any extra poundage. But we all
have been witness to the repeated remarks about good ol' Ron and his
paunch. You folks set the rules on this one, not me. As an aside, Erlich
was the first one I recall really making a big deal about El Lardo and
constantly referring to his tubbiness. Having not seen Erlich for 15
years at the time I didn't think much of it. Imagine my suprise when I
saw his ugly mug splatted across Wired and then on the net... woah! He
ain't missed many feedings himself, despite being out of work.

>   You are full of it, aren't you? I'm not speaking here of The Truth with
> a capital T, Wolf, but the truth about the abuses of this cult you defend
> so mightily. If you cannot understand that , well, that is your head up
> your ass.

Well, I yam what I yam. But you must know by now that defending the CofS
is beyond my capabilities. Nor do I care to defend them. OTOH, you folks
here could definitly use a tune-up when it comes to fighting for
something you believe in. Think of me instead as sort of a free
consultant to ARS. Being basically immodest it's easy for me to state
that I was one of the best players the CofS had. They know it too. The
caliber of folks they assign to recover me is way over the level of the
goons they assign to ARS. So here's my free consulting advice to you
meatheads today -> hysterical ranting and raving coupled with cries of
"Clam!" and "Xenu!" will net you the big zero. That crapola is for
mouth-breathers like anti-cult and zinj and butt kissers like Martin.
You people are not likely to destroy Scientology, so why not consider
the possibility that you could continually change it for the better. Get
a plan.

>  I'm speaking my mind, and if you don't like it, don't read what I write.
> Or ignore it. Or refute it, if you can. Whatever yanks your chain. This
> is Usenet, do what you want.
>   But for one who claims to have read a number of my posts and yet still
> makes a fundemental mistake like thinking (for one) I'm a Sub-Genius, you
> aren't looking as rational as you'd like.

Now I never said *I* was rational, just that my thought processes are. I
obviously like what you write, why else would I be here?

Wolf


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2008 Google