Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology
From: Wolf <wolft...@micron.net>
Date: 1998/05/21
Subject: Re: Is it true?
Starshadow wrote: Of course I have credibility... just not with you. BTW, I'm not accusing > In article <35634BCD.1...@micron.net>, wolft...@micron.net says... > > Other than heresay, prove this. > Hey, I'm not in a court of law. I believe Stacy Young's post. She has Stacey of lying, I'm merely suggesting she has edited the actual events in whatever fashion she deemed appropriate to support her claims. > > > that they do have world Yikes! A *witch*! But hang in there Granny, if I'm an idiot then you > > > domination plans, > > Hey... you're a subgenius droid aren't you? > There's that fabulous tek in action. You idiot, I'm a *witch*. Not a have to be a droid. Them's the rules. > > > they do use the "confessional folders" to blackmail members What you've seen are things posted on this ng that have been claimed to > > Prove it. Especially the *blackmail* > Hey, I've seen things posted on *this* newsgroup from people's be from peoples folders. Common sense (of which I have copious amounts) would tell you that after millions of hours of auditing, somebody, somewhere is bound to scan a few folders looking for dirt. It happens in Law offices, psychiatric offices, doctors offices all the time. But to make a point: *Scientology* does not utilize the confidental contents of pc folders for blackmail. > > > they do own some secret vaults that have their dead guru's writings Okay. I'll post this: Tilman Hauser is a direct genetic descendant of > > Hey... you're a subgenius droid aren't you? If you could prove this one > Unless it's six pack of Dr. Pepper (Diet) I'm not interested. But again Ghengis Khan, Martin Hunt is actually a plant - a strange hybrid of pinto beans and basmati rice - and Starshadow is not really a witch, she's a Loyal Officer. Using your logic it's all now true. Unless, of course, you can prove otherwise. > > > they do orchestrate hiring of PIs to harass, Well? Apparently you can't prove it. Except that 'it's been posted'. > > 'orchestrate'? Is that a crafty way of saying you can't prove this? > Geeze, do you need a dictionary to understand words of more than two <snip dead dog chat> > Yap, yap. The posters that have talked about this have some integrity, In other words, you can't prove it. > I have believed them. If you don't, that's your problem, not mine. > > Starshadow... the only thing *in action* on this NG is yours and the The Minton-German-evil-psyche-lord-Nazi one is different than the > > other ARS culties paranoia and conspiracy schemes. > Yeah, real paranoia. It isn't the critics who scream "German evil-deathcult-world-takeover-OSA-helicopter one. You gotta remember to keep your conspiracies straight. > > Hmmm. Well, you are a bigot, that is clear by not only your language, Me too. Thankfully no such cults exist in our fair land. > > but that of a good 25% of the Leadership of ARS. > Yeah, Wolf. I'm a bigot. I really hate cults which lock up people until <snip> > Now that has been stated once or twice and then refuted by numerous Wow. At least he wasn't a child molester! > people, some of them critics. I don't believe LRH was a child molester. A > wife and child abuser, a bigamist, a paranoid shizophrenic, a liar, a > sometime decent pulp-writer, charismatic and entertaining outside of his > cult, that I'm sure of. I heard from his own lips that he started the > whole thing as a scam. I guess that he was lying, though, or maybe I was > lying and somehow all the people at Norwescon One were lying that heard > him say the same thing. <snip> > > > going into paroxisms(sp?) anytime someone lists their spam web pages and It's the way of the world. That CofS employs the methods they do doesn't > > > even links to them. > > Squeeky wheel gets the grease.. that's what ol' Wolf advises. > > > This of course is Scientology in action. make them Scientology methods. But it must smart to feel so self-righteous and keep getting your collective butts kicked by them terrible people. > > > Notice that Wolf calls a newsgroup a "cult" as though he could make a Right now Starshadow, there is a power struggle in the ARS Cult. Erlich > > > thinking person believe that all critics are somehow mind-controlled to > > > believe terrible things about his favorite real UFO cult. > > Okay, ya got me there. Strictly speaking, ARS is not a cult. But then > Right, we are all in a cult. You know about as much of that as you do has seemingly lost ground because he can't get a job and Wollersheim has been found out to be what many of us knew all along, an attention-mooch. Tilman has fallen victim to the clam-meme virus and Rob has proven steadily that he's too intelligent to buy into _all_ the rants and spew of this cult. RVY and his bride are angling to fill the vacuum by planning and staging daring GO type operations and rescuing fair maidens in the nick of time, but who can trust a couple of ex-GO button men? Barwell would love to be leader but he *plonks* anyone who says anything that isn't exactly what he wants to hear. Henson has the smarts, but the RTC left tread marks on his checkbook. I don't think you want the job... so... that leaves Dave Bird, He's the only ARS cultie here who has consistently been looney enough to dribble his garbage out in an on-policy, 100% standard fashion. Plus there's the added bonus of his giant beard and bohemian appearance. I vote for Dave! > Oh, well, at least we don't have to spend thousands to get rid of space This from a *witch*? Pot=Kettle? > cooties. > > > read the ng long enough that while critics have and do criticize within Why would I lie? If I had any compassion (according to Monica P I don't) > > > their own ranks when they think anyone is wrong, and admit mistakes, > > LOL!! Spelling mistakes sure. Hell, even a few grammer mistakes. But > Bullshit. You are lying. As usual. my little feelings might be hurt by that remark. If I'm misinformed I'll take it like a man. But calling me a liar proves nothing. <snip> > > > and that they never defend, they always attack. I disagree. There's a world of difference between failing to confront > > Well, pass. It's policy. A good one too, evidenced by the fact that > It sure makes showing their idiocy easier. Non-confront and all that. something and stonewalling. Witness our current President if you want to observe a true master. It's effective, produces results and has been the preferred weapon of our civilization since language evolved. You want answers? They say nope. Now what ya gonna do? Shoot them? That's life. > > You really are overwhelmed by your involvement in this cult.. Being on I wish you ARS cultists would get it through your skulls... wgert, > > the net hardly qualifies as involving the *whole world* in your > > business. I know, those who have trouble getting attention in the > > non-virtual world sometimes lose track of just how few people really > > give a shit about them online too... but if you wanna think the world is > > watching, who am I to de-program you? > yap yap. If it is so unimportant why the all the attention the cult gunny, whip and the rest aren't major assets of the CofS. They're grunts. Foot soldiers. They don't know dick about what the RTC is up to. The threat of any enemy can be determined by the quality of the assets sent against it. Erlich, Henson, Wollersheim did, at one point, present a threat. That's why bigger guns were brought into play. You guys get wgert. Which shows how much impact ARS has had in the last four years. > > > We just don't like people being locked up until they die, True. But I suspect you see my point. Demonizing Scn and falsely > > Well goddamnit Starshadow! I'd hurry up and book a ticket to Africa, SE > > Asia, China or any number of places on our fair planet where people are > > being locked up, starved, beaten, tortured and brutalized each and every > > minute of the day. Are you a man (woman?) or a mouse? If you really > > care, I mean really, as in this isn't just a diversion so you can pump > > your own diminished ego up, then go find some real brutality and do > > something about it. If not, then I guess you're just paying lip service > > from a safe distance huh? > I don't happen to live in those places. I live in a country where this creating a threat that doesn't exist does little or nothing if you really intend to manipulate a change in the way they treat SO members. This appears to be way too sophisticated for the ARS clam-crowd to comprehend. I'll happily explain it though to anyone who cares to drop the pretense of being the heroic saviours of our children and inspect what is really going on inside CofS members heads. > > > If this is picketing campaign is so useless as Wolf likes to depict, Oooh. Wgert got upset... there's a stat for ya! > > > why then are there so many fits about it on this ng? > > Who has fits? I haven't seen any fits. WTF are you talking about? > Wgert, Justin, you, et al, getting your panties all in a knot. <snip Wolf's remarks about weight gain, pc's and Ho-Ho addiction> > I'm fat. So what? Does this make me a bad person? Does it make anyone Actually I didn't know you were sporting any extra poundage. But we all > who is fat a bad person? I've noticed people of all sizes picketing. WTF > does it have to do with anything except your own bigotry against fat > people??? have been witness to the repeated remarks about good ol' Ron and his paunch. You folks set the rules on this one, not me. As an aside, Erlich was the first one I recall really making a big deal about El Lardo and constantly referring to his tubbiness. Having not seen Erlich for 15 years at the time I didn't think much of it. Imagine my suprise when I saw his ugly mug splatted across Wired and then on the net... woah! He ain't missed many feedings himself, despite being out of work. > You are full of it, aren't you? I'm not speaking here of The Truth with Well, I yam what I yam. But you must know by now that defending the CofS > a capital T, Wolf, but the truth about the abuses of this cult you defend > so mightily. If you cannot understand that , well, that is your head up > your ass. is beyond my capabilities. Nor do I care to defend them. OTOH, you folks here could definitly use a tune-up when it comes to fighting for something you believe in. Think of me instead as sort of a free consultant to ARS. Being basically immodest it's easy for me to state that I was one of the best players the CofS had. They know it too. The caliber of folks they assign to recover me is way over the level of the goons they assign to ARS. So here's my free consulting advice to you meatheads today -> hysterical ranting and raving coupled with cries of "Clam!" and "Xenu!" will net you the big zero. That crapola is for mouth-breathers like anti-cult and zinj and butt kissers like Martin. You people are not likely to destroy Scientology, so why not consider the possibility that you could continually change it for the better. Get a plan. > I'm speaking my mind, and if you don't like it, don't read what I write. Now I never said *I* was rational, just that my thought processes are. I > Or ignore it. Or refute it, if you can. Whatever yanks your chain. This > is Usenet, do what you want. > But for one who claims to have read a number of my posts and yet still > makes a fundemental mistake like thinking (for one) I'm a Sub-Genius, you > aren't looking as rational as you'd like. obviously like what you write, why else would I be here? Wolf You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| ||||||||||||||