Prignillius <Use-Author-Address-Header@[127.1]> wrote in article
<19970805161805.10921.qm...@nym.alias.net>:

I wouldn't call this type of CAN statement about Wollersheim
exactly a "confidence", except in Dennis manipulative way of
presenting things. It seems to me that these are things that are
being told regularly in the framework of a difficult and
confrontational area such as the cult/anticult one. All it says
is that CAN didn't regard Wollersheim as trustworthy, which is
nothing that will surprise any of us here who can see his many
frailties right here in the newsgroup. Was that such a big
secret that he wouldn't guess already himself on the part of CAN
(if he has a minimum of sense of observation)? Is this something
that they told *only* to Diane and to nobody else and that they
protect as a jealously held secret? Common!

You are a bit quick on the trigger, Prig, playing along with the
typical cult leader game of Dennis and his misrepresentations
and guilt games. You completely ignore the part Dennis played in
the story, as well as his motivations. This makes your analysis,
that are otherwise usually pretty thorough, rather incomplete
this time.

Bernie