Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology
From: Room 666 <sch...@hell.high>
Date: 1998/08/18
Subject: Re: Hubbard's college grades
x...@mindspring.com (Rob Clark) wrote: Finally, a critic almost man enough to admit the truth. I say "almost," >dear drooler: >you are indeed probably correct about l. ron hubbard never directly because he first has to get in a cheap shot (dear drooler) to soften the damaging effect of the admission, and then makes sure he puts in the "probably," to further soften it up and leave room for doubt. But Rob, as they are saying about Slick Willy's confession, "It's a But then, of course, you go and louse the whole thing up: >however, you utterly FLUNK on the larger issue. Oh, no, no, no, no, NO! PLEASE, Rob! Now you start to sound so pathetic. You start to sound like a Presidential advisor, shuckin' and jivin', trying to misdirect and obfuscate and prevaricate--not to say "lie." There IS no "larger issue." FLUNK! Here's the only issue that this 1. A critic, "The Exile" <exile...@hotmail.com>, told a lie. He claimed, 2. An anonymous poster asked him to post quotes where Hubbard had done 3. The Exile neither posted a quote to back up his assertion, nor 4. An army of critics have jumped on the bandwagon, trying to turn this Why are you, and every other critic who has posted on this thread, being I, personally, would have a great deal more respect for The Exile if he In the meantime, every critic who tries to change the subject of the Give it up. The Exile is busted. Admit the lie. And demand that The You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| ||||||||||||||