The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 |
Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology
From: Wolf <wolft...@micron.net>
Date: 1998/05/30
Subject: What's true for you....
Ydrrisil wrote: Not a one. Not in any school, Scn or otherwise. The reason why is fairly > >> Ask yourself this Wolf, or Bernie, - have you ever seen any encouragement > >Of course. What is true for you is what you have observed yourself to be > ah yes - the words. So how many graduations or course rooms have you been in obvious. > I would love to hear your stories about this. I have spent a lot of time in Hubbard built a firewall against your sort with his 'what's true for > courserooms and not once have I ever seen it, yet there are things that are > demonstrably wrong. you' cornerstone. > A case in point - the condition of Power - I have no idea whether you Not that I can recall. But then I was in Power almost non-stop and it's > remember this or not - but for years it was "a straight line up" - remember? > For years everyone went through word clearing etc about it because it was utter > crap. hard to see that line from such heighth.... > I ended up in ethics trouble for saying precisely that. Here's my theory about that. I never had ethics trouble because I kept > Then along comes a "new" hcopl and definition saying that everyone got it all > wrong. my own counsel on such matters. While you seem to think that the only way to be a Scn is to agree with everything or word-clear and do ethics cycles until you do. At least that's how you come across. That perception of Scn exists in only two places I know of -> the Sea Org and ARS. That the Opinion Leaders of ARS are primarily ex-SO may be telling in why that perception exists here. It's no secret how much time I spent being a Scn. During that time I had literally thousands of conversations with Scn who _did_ disagree or doubt the workablility of one or another aspect of the tech. So what? If it was a strong enough disagreement, they moved on. If not, it wasn't an issue. BTW, the real secret to getting the most out of Scn is to never join the Wolf > As for being selective - maybe I am though I have only ever seen RA be capable
> of trying to promulgate an approved PR line > ************************************* > Live life unzipped - become president of the USA You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| |||||||||||||