diane's lameness - alt.religion.scientology

Message from discussion diane's lameness

Dave Bird---St Hippo of Augustine

More options Aug 19 1997, 3:00 am

Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology

From: Dave Bird---St Hippo of Augustine <d...@xemu.demon.co.uk>

Date: 1997/08/19

Subject: diane's lameness

  Reply to author
  |
  Forward
  | Print
  | View thread
  | Show original
  | Report this message
  | Find messages by this author
  

In article <33F86AA9.2...@gramercy.ios.com>,

jbwebb <jbw...@gramercy.ios.com> writes:
>Another point that I find really stubborn about you is how you are always
>on the side of the cult and the anticultists are "worse" than the cults.
> You know, you and others have opened my eyes up to the faults and
>failings of some of the anticultists. I've learned that nothing is truly
>black or white. But you won't budge from this stance even in the wake of
>overwhelming requests of you to answer how many anti cultists have

>1. Killed their followers
>2. Killed their critics
>3. Planned to overthrow the government
>4. Planned mass destruction

Drowned people's dogs......

>etc, etc, etc,

>You are comparing apples and oranges, but won't admit that. I think the
>Jonestown/Can threads were the final straw.

Yes, but my reaction was not he was "hardheaded". I felt that, as
an apologist for murderers (not manslaughter in this case), he
revolted me to the depths of my being and I wanted to vomit over
him to show my total disgust. But then perhaps I'm seeing things
too much in black & white.

-oOo-

By the way, Spoons, what is it that Dennis PREVIOUSLY DID which
was calculated -- had it succeeded -- to silence you?

I notice you haven't answered yet.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

In article <33f8d9bf.39325...@snews.zippo.com>,

Diane Richardson <refe...@bway.net> writes:
>I grew exasperated with his increasingly hostile tone towards those
>who did not share his views. Rather than being willing to discuss
>differences of opinion, Dennis becomes very aggressive and takes any
>disagreement as a personal affront.

And you don't?

>I was tired of watching him
>insult and belittle people who were doing nothing more than offering
>an opinion that did not agree 100 percent with his own.

And you don't?
In psychiatric terms this is called "projection";
in everyday talk, P-K-B.

BTW, Diane, why i it you come up with lame objections to people's
messages when it is inconvenient for you to answer the substance?
You objected to the capitalisation of one of Pam's articles (but I
notice you didn't answer it when I rewrote it in lower case for you).
And you more or less told efish she was "acting like a silly woman."

Hmm. Talking of gender bias, is it always or more often other women
you feel you can put down and ignore in this way?

/; ;\
-- Regards, __ \\____//
XEMoo.Moo.Moo /{_\_/ \`'\_/__ (cow by P.Kistner
<d...@xemu.demon.co.uk> \___ (o\ /o } <u...@sunyit.edu>)
_____________________________/ :--' ____________________
http://www.xemu.demon.co.uk/ \_ `__\ ---[ now you've made me ]
\___(o'o) [_really MAAAaadd!___]
`===='
"So many idiots, so few comets" ..OldTimer on ARS

Reply to author Forward