Google Groups Home
Help | Sign in
Message from discussion CAN and KLAN - reply to Bernie
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
ef  
View profile
 More options May 12 1999, 3:00 am
Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology
From: <e...@some.where>
Date: 1999/05/12
Subject: Re: CAN and KLAN - reply to Bernie
In article <19990511220214.25251.00001...@ng-ch1.aol.com>,

size13...@aol.comnospam (Size13EEE) wrote:

two scientologists talking to each other, doing a bit of revisionism,
huh:

> Bernie asked:

> >Was CAN bunked under a law designed to combat the Klan? More info
> >please.

> >P.S. Please send me an email copy if you answer. Thanks.

> IANAL but I do know how to read legal material.  Based on that here's a short
> answer that points to the proper authorities on the question.

> CAN and Rick Ross were successfully sued by Jason Scott under Title 42 Section
> 1985(3) of the United States Code.  Section 1985 is based on, or updates, the
> Ku Klux Klan Act of 1871.  The Ku Klux Klan Act of 1871 was the basic law
> passed by the US Congress to uphold and enforce the Civil War Amendments that
> extended equal rights to all US citizens,  to put force behind civil war
> amendments by providing avenue for redress of injuries suffered by class of
> newly emancipated slaves.  McLellan v. Mississippi Power & Light Co., C.A.5
> (Miss.) 1977, 545 F.2d 919.  In the 1960's these were all updated in response
> to violence in the southern US that was aimed at suppressing the political
> participation of Negros.

<snip of scurillous garbage>

could someone please illuminate the general audience as to how exactly
jason scott was tricked into working for the "church" in bringing down
CAN? i also notice that our cos pal here neglects the aftermath where
the selfsame jason scott fires the scientology lawyer for having
tricked him. oh yeah... and (quelle surprise) 13EEE scientological
feats of fancy never does describe how jason is not good friends with
the eeeevil deeeeprogrammer rick ross and credits him with his, yes!
freedom.

manohman. you guys  really are a disgusting piece of work. people who
lie on purpose are the scum of the earth. i think i need a bath from
the proximity.

jim? your input please re jason... these jerks are attempting to
re-write history.

-ef


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2008 Google