Google Groups Home Help | Sign in
Message from discussion Is it true?
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
Wolf  
View profile
 More options Jun 4 1998, 3:00 am
Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology
From: Wolf <wolft...@micron.net>
Date: 1998/06/04
Subject: Re: Is it true?

Eric S. Smith: Left-Field Marshal wrote:

> In article <35839fd9.87346...@news.ping.be>, Bernie <b...@arcadis.be> wrote:
> >Wolf <wolft...@micron.net> wrote:
> >>That
> >>by constant pressure you might be having a part in actually growing the
> >>CofS, rather than eliminating it?

> "Okay, honey, that's enough 60 Minutes segments for me.  Let's go join an
>  expensive scam organization!"

Just read in the paper this morning that GM/Chevy trucks rank as #1 in
customer satisfaction. Despite the heavy media attention GM received
about exploding gas tanks. Are you really suprised that negative media
coverage doesn't always cause lowered sales? Do you still eat apples?
Drink coffee? Buy packaged meats? Despite ARS assertions that negative
PR *does* have a negative effect on potential Scn's, the fact is that
media exposure often does little more than raise public awareness that
certain things actually exist. Realize too that excessive criticism
often makes people curious as to what all the ruckus is about. And not
every curious person agrees with the negative PR. Just the musings of
someone who has made a good living selling contentious products and
services for 30 years...

> The CoS may eventually get better at not looking like utter cretins in
> court and the press, but I doubt that they'll have a big renaissance
> and become wildly popular around the world.  Whatever the efficacy of
> criticism in this and other places, there's still the fundamental
> "Hubbard made it up as he went along" problem.

They look like cretins to you Eric, but then you're hardly open-minded
are you? If it were that simple then no religion would ever get out of
the starting gate. I disagree that "Hubbard made it all up" is as big a
stumbling block as you think it is. It's fundamental that any person
predisposed to skepticism will point that out - whatever the truth of it
is - but you're not in the majority... at least as far as I can tell.

    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2008 Google