The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 |
Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology, alt.religion.scientology.xenu
From: wg...@loop.com (wgert)
Date: 1997/08/06
Subject: Re: FACTNet's Database and Copyright Infringement
mart...@islandnet.com (Martin Hunt) wrote: Very true. >In article <33e52a0e.2437...@snews.zippo.com>, >refe...@bway.net (Diane Richardson) wrote: >>Then why did you ask if you expected an answer you didn't want to see? >>Dennis, you are playing games of the worst sort here. If you fail to >>see what you're doing, I can assure you many others can. >BWAHAHAHAHA! What "others", Diane? :-) Me for one. >Speak for yourself; you don't represent me, you don't represent Get off it. She answered Dennis' questions - which he already knew >anyone but yourself in this new level of vileness. the answers to anyway. He can't now cry "foul". >One true sign of desperation approaching utter loss in a debate is I don't see it this way at all. She has made very good, concise and >to haul in nebulous "others" to back up your collapsing position. >But then, you know that as well as I do, Diane. straightforward statements all along. When asked, she answered the questions. Unlike many of the people posting on this newsgroup, she does not seem to have any particular axe to grind and so doesn't have to take the usual anti-Scientology position, just to get another dig in. >>By Priscilla Coates and by Cynthia Kisser's husband, to be specific. This description of events sounds very much like Wollersheim. In fact >>I would not have revealed the names of these sources, Dennis, if you >>it that were so unwilling to sign over your defense fund to Larry when >>you had been able to transfer the funds to Larry, you made it quite >>plain to me that you would never consider such an option because you >>don't trust the guy. >>As I have stated above. Priscilla Coates told me how she personally >>Priscilla also told me about a meeting of anti-cult groups Wollersheim >>Bill told me that the last correspondence Wollersheim had with CAN those who are really in the know, understand that Wollersheim is first and foremost a salesman. Actually, he crosses over the line and falls into the category of a "con" in that he inadvertently hypes the latest gimmick or product to his customers. The problem is that every single money making project that he has ever engaged in has resulted in failure and people getting burned. It is the nature of the beast. That is also exactly what is going on with FACTNet at the present time. Wollerhseim has made promises he can't keep, has extended himself and FACTNet financially, he has even sold shares in his judgement. I am sure he has most of his lawyers and other FACTNet members upset with him for promises that he couldn't keep. >>I could go on. I think you get the picture. This is only translation of someone who has no judgement. >Oh, loud and clear. Does anyone need a translation? If so, here it >is: > "I am willing to backstab anyone and everyone and betray every > confidence from Dennis Erlich to Rob Clark to all my erstwhile > friends in pursuit of vengeance against anyone I ever get angry > at." > "Do not ever trust me again, or you may regret it one day." Bull. > - Signed, Diane Richardson. This is quite a vindictive statement in itself and is not meant to be >Thanks for letting me know, not that I ever did trust you, >particularly. It's funny; some people I just quickly trust >and they never seem to let me down, even when mightily tested >in hot and angry exchanges. You know, as ugly as it once got >between some critics and I in the past, certain lines were >still never crossed. Certain lines you have just jumped clear >over. helpful at all but only to try and hurt Diane's feelings. You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| |||||||||||||