COS's "Original Overt"? - alt.religion.scientology

Message from discussion COS's "Original Overt"?

Rob Clark

More options Oct 26 1997, 2:00 am

Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology

From: x...@mindspring.com (Rob Clark)

Date: 1997/10/26

Subject: Re: COS's "Original Overt"?

  Reply to author
  |
  Forward
  | Print
  | View thread
  | Show original
  | Report this message
  | Find messages by this author
  

On 26 Oct 1997 10:16:03 GMT, wonderf...@aol.com (WONDERFULR) wrote:

>>Hubbard presented that for one to be suppressed by another he must have
>>first committed an overt against the suppressor.

>>COS, I ask you... What was your original overt against us?

>>David Alexander
>Missing your withholds. Making you wonder if we had found out about you. It
> was the uncertainity of if we had, that got you started. Your own
> abberations have kept it going.

you really ARE a wonderfool, aren't you?

if your dumb ho of babble-on hadn't sent an rmgroup, and your cancelbunny
hadn't illegally forged cancels, i would never have even heard of this
newsgroup, i certainly wouldn't have sat about worrying about scientology but
instead perhaps had a laugh about it.

if you hadn't then raided dennis erlich, i wouldn't have stayed.

you are, however, honestly so fucking stupid i bet you believe that twaddle.

rob

Reply to author Forward