Google Groups Home Help | Sign in
Message from discussion **Biased Journalism** V3no6 Henson Stealth Picket
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
Michael Reuss  
View profile
 More options Oct 12 1997, 3:00 am
Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology
From: mre...@rmi.nospam.net (Michael Reuss)
Date: 1997/10/12
Subject: Re: **Biased Journalism** V3no6 Henson Stealth Picket

> wg...@loop.com (wgert) wrote:
>I heard about this picket from someone who happened to be over at the
>complex when Henson was leaving.  When he asked one of the
>pro-Scientology picketers about what happened, he heard that
>apparently there was some claim in a divorce case that Henson had
>molested one or more of his daughters.   Henson was apparently asked
>about this and refused to answer.

Let me see if I've got your story straight (FYI, you read this comic
book style, William).

Wgert:

  \o/   ...heard from           \o/     ...that               \o/    
   |    someone who was at       |      "someone" had          |
  /'\   Cedars as Keith         /'\     apparently made a     /'\
(wgert) Henson left there... (someone)  a CLAIM...         (claimant?)

  ... that Keith     \o/        ...of molesting   o    o    ... of his
  H. had been         |         one or more...   /|\  /|\   daughters.
  accused...         /'\                         / \  / \
                  (accuser?)                  (one or more
                                                daughters)

Note: notice that all the Scientologists in my depiction are waving
their hands in the air (and are wearing no pants).

Is that your story, gertie? If I got it right, or even close, you have
proved yet again that you personally, as well as the organization you
represent are nothing but a pack of mean, low, despicable,
slimebuckets. But that probably makes you an above average upper level
OSA clam. Congratulations! I'm sure your mother would be very proud of
you (that is, if you haven't disconnected from her).

>It is curious that he would leave this part out of the story
>as told to Biased Journalism.   Now, that is biased!

Keep 'em coming, wgert. You ain't gonna scare Keith Henson away with
little comic book tales like this. He understands some of the forces
swirling around every ugly little statement like this. He understands
that the more Scientologists like you, posting this kind of "straight
from the heart of Scientology" sentiment, so obviously laced with
festering, rotting hatred, the fewer newbies and lurkers will fall for
your cult's bullshit claim that Scientology makes you more "ethical."

But on the up side, I'm sure Greta Van Susteren will still like you.

OFB rides again!

--
Michael Reuss   (remove nospam from address to reply by e-mail)
Honorary Kid


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2008 Google