Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology
From: mre...@rmi.nospam.net (Michael Reuss)
Date: 1997/10/12
Subject: Re: **Biased Journalism** V3no6 Henson Stealth Picket
> wg...@loop.com (wgert) wrote: Let me see if I've got your story straight (FYI, you read this comic >I heard about this picket from someone who happened to be over at the >complex when Henson was leaving. When he asked one of the >pro-Scientology picketers about what happened, he heard that >apparently there was some claim in a divorce case that Henson had >molested one or more of his daughters. Henson was apparently asked >about this and refused to answer. book style, William). Wgert: \o/ ...heard from \o/ ...that \o/ ... that Keith \o/ ...of molesting o o ... of his Note: notice that all the Scientologists in my depiction are waving Is that your story, gertie? If I got it right, or even close, you have >It is curious that he would leave this part out of the story Keep 'em coming, wgert. You ain't gonna scare Keith Henson away with >as told to Biased Journalism. Now, that is biased! little comic book tales like this. He understands some of the forces swirling around every ugly little statement like this. He understands that the more Scientologists like you, posting this kind of "straight from the heart of Scientology" sentiment, so obviously laced with festering, rotting hatred, the fewer newbies and lurkers will fall for your cult's bullshit claim that Scientology makes you more "ethical." But on the up side, I'm sure Greta Van Susteren will still like you. OFB rides again! -- You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| ||||||||||||||