Google Groups Home
Help | Sign in
Scientology's upcoming massive offensive (fwd)
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  8 messages - Collapse all
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
Joe Harrington  
View profile
 More options Dec 19 1997, 3:00 am
Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology
From: Joe Harrington <joeh...@worldnet.att.net>
Date: 1997/12/19
Subject: Scientology's upcoming massive offensive (fwd)

Lawrence Wollersheim writes:    

"Things are going very bad for Scientology around the world particularly
in the US. The  faint smell of real panic of a ship going down is
showing up more and more both in critical US litigation and in their new
media relations.

Income is down. New people are leaving faster as they find out what's
going on and as they hear more about Scientology's real nature and
history. Recruiting and promotion is getting tougher every day. Every
effort they make is almost immediately countered.

The future looks like it is only going to get a lot worse and stay that
way, but this is exactly the time you can expect Scientology to initiate
a massive counter attack and counter PR attack. Policy absolutely
demands it!

Much like the failed strategy of the Nazis in the battle of the bulge,
over history they have traditionally used the Christmas holidays to
finalize and or launch their silly counter attacks because some "Big
Being in the Blue Barn thinks the rest of us are relaxing with our
holiday parties.

What I suspect is coming as the "new" counter attack is some type of
massive  reworking of the Conspiracy - RICO or religious persecution
type lawsuits against Scientology adversaries with the appropriate PR
fantasy machine revved up to full speed to match the wild rhetoric of
the new suits. They have already been betraying their panic by dropping
the wildest rhetoric in court I have seen in 17 years.

Don't be fooled for a minute. They really don't expect to win these new
conspiracy type suits. In fact, I believe they are most certainly
fabricating them with the clear intention of dropping them latter on
after they have served their real purpose, which is to have a really
big, dramatic, exciting story to yell to the world that will help
redirect and misdirect membership attention away from the sea of bad
reports that they are continually being exposed to.

They are VERY VERY worried about internal defections --- much more than
any outside threat, and they should be. They already know that 1998 will
be leading off with some of the worst mass publicity they have EVER had
and then its rapidly going downhill from there.

I want this on the record so those of you understand mind control in
closed authoritarian environments will not yourselves be misdirected or
redirected and can properly prepare for this very predictable and
somewhat boring large scale coming counter offensive. If you are aware
of
it you will be more likely to keep focused on the real objective of
accelerating the efforts at bringing the truth about Scientology
directly to the members, their families and Scientology's new recruits."

IMHO

Lawrence Wollersheim
Personally

Joe


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Zinjifar  
View profile
 More options Dec 20 1997, 3:00 am
Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology
From: zinji...@inreach.com (Zinjifar)
Date: 1997/12/20
Subject: Re: Scientology's upcoming massive offensive (fwd)

In article <67fbbj$...@mtinsc04.worldnet.att.net>, joeh...@worldnet.att.net
says...

Massive offensive eh?

Considering the massively offensive nature of the DAing attacks by wgert et al,
pet murder, PR fiascos obviously Operation Foot-Bullet is the most effective
campaign every run by a fictitious conspiracy, and requires nothing more than
letting the cult do what comes naturally.

While I don't doubt that scientology theory demands the belief that a
conspiracy must be responsible for the present low state of stats, it's also
obvious that the ARSCC is incapable of agreeing on thin crust or thick.
What a nice crazy conspiracy.

RICO is a criminal charge tho, and it would take a totally brain dead DA to
even consider filing them.
Far as I know there are no civil RICO possibilities.. which really screws up
the old harassing machinery.

Massive offensive clams,.. that's the ticket

Make your lying scumbag of a phrophet proud.

Zinj


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Future808  
View profile
 More options Dec 20 1997, 3:00 am
Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology
From: future...@aol.com (Future808)
Date: 1997/12/20
Subject: Re: Scientology's upcoming massive offensive (fwd)

>What I suspect is coming as the "new" counter attack is some type of
>massive  reworking of the Conspiracy - RICO.....

Ah yes, good old RICO. In the late 80s, OSA Int had a unit specifically working
on RICO lawsuits. I would imagine this still exists.

Unfortuantly, the Co$ has not figured it out yet - whatever they send out in
the way of PR will come back and hit them 10X, at least.
The last year of mirroring sites when the original was shut down should have
taught them this. I guess they haven't found the real SP that
is destroying them internally yes (insert low toned snicker here).

Merry Christmas,

Ex-CMO

 "People who would aspire to transform the world should start by
  transforming their own life and let it serve as an inspiration for
  others. Hubbard wrote best about what he most needed to learn."
          - Joe Harrington <joeh...@worldnet.att.net>


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
William Barwell  
View profile
 More options Dec 20 1997, 3:00 am
Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology
From: wbarw...@Starbase.NeoSoft.COM (William Barwell)
Date: 1997/12/20
Subject: Re: Scientology's upcoming massive offensive (fwd)

In article <19971220202601.PAA27...@ladder02.news.aol.com>,

Future808 <future...@aol.com> wrote:
>>What I suspect is coming as the "new" counter attack is some type of
>>massive  reworking of the Conspiracy - RICO.....

>Ah yes, good old RICO. In the late 80s, OSA Int had a unit specifically working
>on RICO lawsuits. I would imagine this still exists.

>Unfortuantly, the Co$ has not figured it out yet - whatever they send out in
>the way of PR will come back and hit them 10X, at least.
>The last year of mirroring sites when the original was shut down should have
>taught them this. I guess they haven't found the real SP that
>is destroying them internally yes (insert low toned snicker here).

  Last RICO suit they tried was thrown out of court and their lawyers
sanctioned.  Apparently OSA didn't get it figured out then either.
A RICO suit is going to be hard to bring and would galavanize the net
again.

I think they will stick to their petty harassments ala Bob Minton for the
while.

Look in 1998 for ARSCC pickets designed into getting them to over react
ala CW.

Pope Charles
SubGenius Pope Of Houston
Slack!


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Bev  
View profile
 More options Dec 20 1997, 3:00 am
Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology
From: Bev <dbj1...@iag.net>
Date: 1997/12/20
Subject: Re: Scientology's upcoming massive offensive (fwd)

Doe1thru5 wrote:
> >From: future...@aol.com (Future808)
> > In the late 80s, OSA Int had a unit specifically working
> > on RICO lawsuits. I would imagine this still exists.
> An interesting comparison in the use of RICO suits to harass ideological
> enemies is in the campaign by the Christic Institute, a radical left wing
> political cult, who tried using RICO because of the crippling legal costs it
> puts on defendants and because of procedural features of the suit.  They had no
> realistic chance of winning such a suit against anyone they used it against,
> but found it was a worthwhile tool of harassment nevertheless.  It's odd that
> groups like the Christic Institute, with ties to violent organizations having
> more deaths that can be laid at their feet than the CoS could hope to muster,
> aren't hounded in the public as much as this kind of barratry would suggest.
> The downside of barratrous legal harassment may well be overestimated when you
> start looking over the range of people doing it, not just a single abuser

Yes, I agree with that.  I've said before the Co$ isn't doing anything
that the legal system isn't allowing them to do.

I have to admit I was really ignorant of the legal system, period, until
getting involved with the Co$.  I was stunned to learn that with a
writ of seizure (especially seeing that the Judges didn't totally chekc
out and verify the data they received from the Co$ BEFORE putting their
signature to them) the Co$ could enter and pillage private citizens
homes.

Since finding that out and then being able to get on the net and follow
all the legal shenanigans that have followed, as well as see and learn
about the legal manipulations from earlier available on web pages, I
am amazed but mostly saddened to see that the legal system is nothing
more than a game where in too many cases the one with the most money
wins.

I think that is why the Co$ is really on an all out war against Bob
Minton.  The people that Bob has out of an individuals right of
choice decided to help by balancing the prior unfair scales of
monetary power has caused the Co$ much upset.

Mainly because without MONEY, they would have been steamrolled.
Now due to what is right or wrong, but strictly out of money.  Now
the playing field has been leveled and there is an opportunity
for them to get fair access to the courts (isn't it amazing that
fair access depends on money!!), and they are absolutely infuriated
that their despised enemies have now been able to fight back rather
than have to succumb to quitting because they ran out of funds and
end up being gagged and have to do other forms of compliance in
order to avoid being strangled by financial asphyxiation.

I hope that these cases make a reform not ONLY for the Co$, but
somehow they will affect the abuses in the legal system that as you
have pointed out have been going on and are not only used by the
Co$.  Good grief, give us po' little guys equality for justice, too.

Beverly


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Doe1thru5  
View profile
 More options Dec 21 1997, 3:00 am
Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology
From: doe1th...@aol.com (Doe1thru5)
Date: 1997/12/21
Subject: Re: Scientology's upcoming massive offensive (fwd)

>From: future...@aol.com (Future808)
> In the late 80s, OSA Int had a unit specifically working
> on RICO lawsuits. I would imagine this still exists.

An interesting comparison in the use of RICO suits to harass ideological
enemies is in the campaign by the Christic Institute, a radical left wing
political cult, who tried using RICO because of the crippling legal costs it
puts on defendants and because of procedural features of the suit.  They had no
realistic chance of winning such a suit against anyone they used it against,
but found it was a worthwhile tool of harassment nevertheless.  It's odd that
groups like the Christic Institute, with ties to violent organizations having
more deaths that can be laid at their feet than the CoS could hope to muster,
aren't hounded in the public as much as this kind of barratry would suggest.  
The downside of barratrous legal harassment may well be overestimated when you
start looking over the range of people doing it, not just a single abuser.

d15


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Chris Sutor  
View profile
 More options Dec 22 1997, 3:00 am
Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology
From: cob...@tigerden.com (Chris Sutor)
Date: 1997/12/22
Subject: Re: Scientology's upcoming massive offensive (fwd)

Zinjifar (zinji...@inreach.com) spake thusly:

: While I don't doubt that scientology theory demands the belief that a
: conspiracy must be responsible for the present low state of stats, it's also
: obvious that the ARSCC is incapable of agreeing on thin crust or thick.
: What a nice crazy conspiracy.

Dammit! Chicago Style! I can't believe I was the only one who raised my
hand. A thousand psychiatrists, bankers, news hounds, and other assorted
ARSCC members, allround the big table at ARSCC HQ (which also does not
exist) and not one other hand gets raised in support.

I do get a little worried about Scientology, and it's thoughts of mounting
an offensive - in the past, they've sent thugs out to beat the tar out of
people who've disagreed with them, attempted to frame critics for crimes
ranging from rape to assaination... and that was without the current
pressure of being cornered on all sides.

My wory is that when the time comes for them to commit to their 'righteous
attack' that they may go beyond a war of words. If the command comes from
on high to draw blood, will the command be carried out?

--
COBALTatTIGERDENdotCOM    I'd really like a New World Order, but  
----==============----      I can only afford a slightly used one.
  now with 10% real       *****************************************
    fruit juice!        Don't blame me, I voted for Richard Dangerous


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
rgonnet  
View profile
 More options Dec 22 1997, 3:00 am
Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology
From: rgonnet <dictionna...@hol.fr>
Date: 1997/12/22
Subject: Re: Scientology's upcoming massive offensive (fwd)

I would'nt have said that there was a possibility of mass suicide some years ago.

I changed my mind while writing my own account upon scientology, and second, by
reading ars.

I am sure there is some danger of any OT level to come could command people to
commit suicide as a method of getting true freedom and unlimited powers.

Think about this:

If one has been able to swallow every bit of elwrong's craps from the beginning
up to OT III- NOTs, then , one is very able to swallow the following super-hyper
crappy steps, whatever they are.

If one has lost every bit of criticism trough the ethics/delation/sec check
system, one is ready to everything.

In every language, the word exists! It's called FANATISM.

Roger


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
End of messages
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2008 Google