There were many who observed this last year. I am proposing another truce for Christmas Day this year.
Happy Holidays, Sassie
================================================
On Tue, 17 Dec 1996 23:44:02 -0500, Bev <dbj1...@iag.net> wrote: >Hi all!! I'm going to be having some company and doing >many things for the next week or so and so most likely will >not be on the NG.
>I would, however, like to take this time to wish everybody >a very Merry Christmas (Ho-Ho-Ho). You know what they say, >be good, but if you can't be good . . . don't get caught!!
>Beverly :)
In keeping with Bev's Holiday wishes I would like to extend a proposal to everyone who posts here.
Could we have a Christmas Day truce on ars? Part of the observance of the holiday is the occasion to spend time with family and friends. I'm sure everyone one us has someone who would value our companionship for that day.
On 19 Dec 1997 07:30:35 GMT, sassi...@aol.com (Sassie10) wrote:
> Part of the >observance of the holiday is the occasion to spend time with >family and friends. I'm sure everyone one us has someone >who would value our companionship for that day.
>Seasons Greetings, >Sassie
P/m
Hypocrite. 10:45PM Thur night, 12/19. 7 vehicles at the big org, 1 at the little org. Next Wed, 12/24, Christmas Eve, 10:45 at night, both orgs will be open again. Thursday, 12/25, Christmas Day, both orgs will open and close at regular business hours.
Luck you, you get to spend time with family and friends. Staff members nation wide *must* come in for another day of business.
So what is going to happen Christmas Eve, and Christmas day between 8pm and 11pm? Why are these orgs open? They might sell a book? Is that it?
Scientology is compatible with Christianity. Or so it is claimed. This year, more than any other, scientology will be noticed.
Did you ever think to shut the orgs down on the one big Christian Holiday that comes each year? Just shut them down. Perhaps fool the Christian Wogs. Perhaps make them think... something???
But no, Christmas Eve and Christmas Day it will be business as usual for a scientology org. Because scientology, except for the hypocrisy of some hidden people, does not honor Christmas.
There are Stats and there is GI. And no silly holiday will interrupt that. <sigh>
If possible I'll do a vehicle count Christmas Eve. Or maybe I'll give them a call and ask if now is a good time to come in and purchase a Comm Course.
Sassie, no truce will stop news stories on Lisa from coming through.
PS. 10:45pm the little org is *still* open for business in a poor and dangerous neighborhood. The only other two stores open anywhere near the CC are a 7-11 and a Liquor Store. They are both a block away. Nothing else is open. It really is quite sad. I'd love to know the Stat for merchandise sold between 10-11pm at night. You people are sick.
Sassie10 <sassi...@aol.com> wrote: >There were many who observed this last year. I am proposing >another truce for Christmas Day this year.
Name one. I don't remember any 'truce' during last years' solstice, or the one before. Deja News shows 179 articles in ARS dated 25 December 1996. Most of the usual suspects posted.
If things got quiet during the holidays it was because it was the holidays. I doubt I'll be on the net on December 25, but that's because I'll be spending time with my family, and most likely pissed (that's drunk for the English-challenged). Then again, I might just take the opportunity to introduce a few relatives to my hobby and show them around a few web sites. A permanent Internet connection is a Wonderful Thing.
Count me out. There are too many people, including Lisa McPherson, who are not around to celebrate Christmas because of $cientology. No cease fire until they stop hurting people, no cease fire until they renounce their psuedo medical claims. No cease fire as long as they have the "Isolation Run-Down."
The Exile "James Stewart has been put in a Condition of Doubt for having [epileptic] seizures in public and thus invalidating Scientology." -posted on the notice board, Edinburgh Org., cited by Jon Atack, pg. 184.
sassi...@aol.com (Sassie10) wrote: >There were many who observed this last year. I am proposing >another truce for Christmas Day this year.
I'll do it, but only if CoS gives org staff the day off.
Otherwise, it doesn't mean jack doodly.
Deana
Deana M. Holmes alt.religion.scientology archivist since February 1995 Defied David Miscavige's Intention Beams, November 1, 1997 mir...@super.zippo.com
In <19971219073000.CAA22...@ladder01.news.aol.com> Sassie10 wrote:
-> There were many who observed this last year. I am proposing -> another truce for Christmas Day this year.
WTF?
If I'm tired of ARS, I just don't read the group for a day or a week. Participation here is voluntary[1], you know.
[1] Unless you're a member of a nut-cult with a billion-year contract and you're assigned to write RonsAmigo posts all day.
-jcr
-- John C. Randolph (408) 358-6732 NeXT mail preferred. Chief Technology Officer, WARPnet Incorporated. @"Hey, %s! You're a NAZI, and you can't spell!"
Sassie10 wrote in message <19971219073000.CAA22...@ladder01.news.aol.com>... >There were many who observed this last year. I am proposing >another truce for Christmas Day this year. >Could we have a Christmas Day truce on ars? Part of the >observance of the holiday is the occasion to spend time with >family and friends. I'm sure everyone one us has someone >who would value our companionship for that day.
Is ARS a game of tit for tat?--that we could give it a break?
This is a one-sided effort to expose a Fraud. That OSA is here directing their spite at us is their effort at disruption, and does not define ARS as a two-sided battle. The Battlefield is Earth, and ARS is the Press. Exposure of the fraud is to happen whether or not we have hecklers in our midst.
We have never waited for their tit before we issued a tat. Your offer is a distortion of our purpose. If we have cognitions without publishing them, then the cognition itself relieves some of our outrage. Having experienced this relief, we won't feel the cause to publish it later. Toss it while it boils.
Are you doing Liability Condition?--and this is your "blow against the enemy"?
OSA never considered they were participating here. They have to make their feeble jabs so they won't get assigned to the Scientology Penitentiary--the RPF.
Your offer reduces duty to convenience. If you want to slack-off, just do it. If you're afraid you'll miss something then don't go away.
In article <349a2b8f.4275...@snews.zippo.com>, Ted Mayett (KoX) <te...@skylink.net> wrote:
>On 19 Dec 1997 07:30:35 GMT, sassi...@aol.com (Sassie10) wrote:
>> Part of the >>observance of the holiday is the occasion to spend time with >>family and friends. I'm sure everyone one us has someone >>who would value our companionship for that day.
>>Seasons Greetings, >>Sassie
Tell it to the people who won't be able to see their own grandchildren because the middle generation was ordered by the vicious criminal cult of Scientology to "disconnect."
Show me evidence that the vicious criminal cult of Scientology is allowing "Christmas truces" under its "disconnect orders."
>10:45PM Thur night, 12/19. 7 vehicles at the big org, 1 at the little >org. Next Wed, 12/24, Christmas Eve, 10:45 at night, both orgs will >be open again. Thursday, 12/25, Christmas Day, both orgs will open >and close at regular business hours.
>Luck you, you get to spend time with family and friends. Staff >members nation wide *must* come in for another day of business.
>So what is going to happen Christmas Eve, and Christmas day between >8pm and 11pm? Why are these orgs open? They might sell a book? Is >that it?
>Scientology is compatible with Christianity. Or so it is claimed. >This year, more than any other, scientology will be noticed.
>Did you ever think to shut the orgs down on the one big Christian >Holiday that comes each year? Just shut them down. Perhaps fool the >Christian Wogs. Perhaps make them think... something???
>But no, Christmas Eve and Christmas Day it will be business as usual >for a scientology org. Because scientology, except for the hypocrisy >of some hidden people, does not honor Christmas.
>There are Stats and there is GI. And no silly holiday will interrupt >that. <sigh>
>If possible I'll do a vehicle count Christmas Eve. >Or maybe I'll give them a call and ask if now is a good time to come >in and purchase a Comm Course.
>Sassie, no truce will stop news stories on Lisa from coming through.
-- ====al...@aimnet.com * LPC * LPUSA * ISIL * IOS * KoX * Netscab Squealer==== LEGALIZE FREEDOM >>>> http://www.lp.org * UBI LIBERTAS IBI PATRIA An electorate terrified of hemp plants growing in closets will crap its collective pants, on cue, over firearms.
In article <67ecot$...@shell1.aimnet.com>, al...@aimnet.com (Alan Furman) writes:
>Tell it to the people who won't be able to see their own >grandchildren because the middle generation was >ordered by the vicious criminal cult of Scientology >to "disconnect."
Alan makes an excellent point. There is a huge group of unseen, unheard victims of the tactics of the CoS. I, myself, had the false concept, inculcated early on, of the destructive nature of anybody who criticized Scientology. As a result, I did try to limit my children's exposure to their grandparents.
The practice of "disconnect"ing is *rarely*, *rarely* used anymore. These days would see more of a passive disconnect than an overt, vocal statement of disconnection. This passe policy was seen as a real PR destroyer, as was "Fair Game", sometime in the late '70's, IIRC. Both are still used, but are not openly stated as such when they are.
In article <19971219073000.CAA22...@ladder01.news.aol.com>, sassi...@aol.com
(Sassie10) writes: >There were many who observed this last year. I am proposing >another truce for Christmas Day this year.
Fellow Christians can have and have had truces on Christmas Day. This is because they see in each other a commonality, and can throw away any political or idealogical differences for that one day because of the commonality.
Scientologists, however, by order of policy by L. Ron Hubbard, cannot feel that commonality for their "avowed and knowing enemies", real or imagined. As a matter of fact, it anyone is declared "suppressive" by the organization, the *ONLY* person he/she is allowed to communicate with in Scientology, is the person holding the post of International Justice Chief in Clearwater, Florida.
Scientologists *should* be able to feel that commonality with _all_ people: suppressives, wogs, scientologists -- everybody; if they were following their policy of the Eight Dynamics. But they would prefer to separate from the rest of society by continuing the practices of attacking and suing critics, declaring people, RPF'ing Staff members, liability formulas, etc.; which *violate* the basic principles upon which all of Scientology was based, such as the Overt/Motivator Sequence, Eight Dynamics and ARC Triangle.
For this reason, a truce with Scientology would be a one sided truce: as we walk across the field of battle to shake hands with them, they'll be walking toward us from their side with weapons carefully concealed, waiting for the perfect moment to rid the world of what they consider to be the lowest forms inhabiting it: the SP's.
>Could we have a Christmas Day truce on ars? Part of the >observance of the holiday is the occasion to spend time with >family and friends. I'm sure everyone one us has someone >who would value our companionship for that day.
I'll cut ya a deal. Your part of the truce will be not to log on and read ARS, thus saving yourself the stress on 'christmas' day (a meaningless holiday to Scientology), and my part of the truce will be to provide a lot of postings that you won't have to read. Happy?