wgert wrote:
> stars...@aol.com (Starsats) wrote:
> > You are suing Grady Ward but have no proof that he is Scamizdat.
> Not true. You haven't been reading the newsgroup closely.
Well, actually, wgert, we have. And we haven't seen even one shred of
evidence that will stand up in a court of law on this matter. But if
you actually have evidence, by all means, show it to us.
> > You deny that Lisa McPherson died at Flag. Then your own records released
> > to the public show otherwise.
> Again not true. You know even less about this.
Again, it's true. A fact that was admitted publicly and is corroborated
by the released documents. Again, if you actually have evidence, I'm
sure there's a lawyer or two down in Florida who would love to hear from
you.
> > Salient points of current lawsuits have been dropped.
> There are injunctions in place in each case for copyright
> infringement.
And yet the Church of Scientology[tm] lost trade secret status in every
case they brought. And once it's gone, it's gone for good. Now, all
that you have is the far weaker copyright protection. The Church of
Scientology[tm] has lost and has lost big, regardless of the outcome of
the remainder of your complaints. In a number of years, all of these
documents become public record. How does that make you feel, wgert?
> I would say that is the idea behind filing these kinds
> of infringement suits.
Really...then would you care to explain a) why the trade secret
complaint was made? and b) why it was dropped?
-Paul
