Google Groups Home
Help | Sign in
DIANE RICHARDSON - ENOUGH
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  4 messages - Collapse all
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
FauxReal59  
View profile
 More options Aug 24 1997, 3:00 am
Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology
From: fauxrea...@aol.com (FauxReal59)
Date: 1997/08/24
Subject: DIANE RICHARDSON - ENOUGH

Look. Diane is clearly deluded. Clinically.  I'm sure that this has been
realized and posted plenty, but hear my plea:

STOP GIVING HER INK ON HERE. SHE DOES NOT DESERVE THE AIR TIME.  WHAT SHE
DESERVES IS BED-REST and MEDICATION.

Be sympathetic to her pathology.  That is all.


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Peter McDermott  
View profile
 More options Aug 24 1997, 3:00 am
Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology
From: n...@petermc.demon.co.uk (Peter McDermott)
Date: 1997/08/24
Subject: Re: DIANE RICHARDSON - ENOUGH

In article <78b79abe47%cl...@holsoft.demon.co.uk>,

Sister Clara <cl...@holsoft.demon.co.uk> wrote:
>> >Of course the poster has not noticed the tiny 1 watt bulb light up within
>> >what passes as a brain, warning hier that the post above has both wasted
>> >further "ink" and granted more "air time".

>>    4 is a guest celeb on ars, Sis.

>I could not give a toss who he is. Being a guest celeb does not prevent the
>posting of tripe. We've all done it at one time or another Dennis and it is
>not unreasonable for it to be called.

Curiously enough, it was a post of a session where fauxskin was
chatting to a scieno on IRC titled 'ClamSex' posted here a few
weeks ago that clued me in to the fact that the behaviour of
some of the critics here had dropped *way*, *way* below the
standards of most of any of the active scienos that I'd seen
posting.

It was the first time I'd *ever* felt instinctive sympathy for
the scieno and revulsion at the critic's tactics. Sadly, it was
far from the last.


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
FauxReal59  
View profile
 More options Aug 24 1997, 3:00 am
Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology
From: fauxrea...@aol.com (FauxReal59)
Date: 1997/08/24
Subject: Re: DIANE RICHARDSON - ENOUGH

Sister Clara?

What are you wearing?


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Bernie  
View profile
 More options Aug 24 1997, 3:00 am
Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology
From: b...@arcadis.be (Bernie)
Date: 1997/08/24
Subject: Re: DIANE RICHARDSON - ENOUGH

hart...@erols.com (Rebecca Hartong) wrote in article
<5tpafl$...@snews1.zippo.com>:

>In article <19970824001101.UAA18...@ladder02.news.aol.com>, fauxrea...@aol.com (FauxReal59) wrote:
>>Look. Diane is clearly deluded. Clinically.  I'm sure that this has been
>>realized and posted plenty, but hear my plea:

>>STOP GIVING HER INK ON HERE. SHE DOES NOT DESERVE THE AIR TIME.  WHAT SHE
>>DESERVES IS BED-REST and MEDICATION.

>>Be sympathetic to her pathology.  That is all.

>This is sad.  Like many people, I find myself foolishly expecting published
>writers to somehow be wiser or smarter than the rest of the pack.

>Here's a vivid example of how wrong that expectation is.

Yes. Such an author tells much more of himself in this small
post than he does in many carefully thought out books. Isn't
Usenet wonderful?

Bernie


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
End of messages
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2008 Google