Google Groups Home
Help | Sign in
Is it true?
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  Messages 51 - 75 of 206 - Collapse all < Older  Newer >
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
The Goblin Wizard  
View profile
 More options May 23 1998, 3:00 am
Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology
From: The Goblin Wizard <gob...@dynamite.REMOVETHIS.com.au>
Date: 1998/05/23
Subject: Re: Is it true?

FLUNK starrate checkout.  He said tried, not succeeded.

Check for MU's.

Cheers,

the wiz


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
WHIPPERSNAPPER  
View profile
 More options May 24 1998, 3:00 am
Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology
From: Whips...@cris.com (WHIPPERSNAPPER)
Date: 1998/05/24
Subject: Re: Is it true?

In article <MPG.fcd7f4f6a05a33989...@nntp.lightlink.com>,

Starshadow <starshad...@mindless.com> wrote:

>... I heard from his [LRH's] own lips that he started the
>whole thing as a scam. I guess that he was lying, though, or maybe I was
>lying and somehow all the people at Norwescon One were lying that heard
>him say the same thing.

I first saw this statement from StartAtShadows years ago on a small
bulletin-board network.  I questioned it then and got nothing but smoke.
It is a unique claim I have seen nowhere else and she has never presented
the slightest proof or corroboration.

Hubbard would never have stepped up to a podium at a public event and
declared Scientology a scam.  Had he done so it would have made front page
news.

The obvious conclusion is that StirredShadows is lying.  God knows she
hasn't the capacity for self-examination it would take to admit she was
ever wrong.  And she probably conceives that her witness to this historic
incident provides her a status boost amongst her fellow armchair bigots.

A possible alternative is that Hubbard uttered some characteristic jest at
which the whole crowd chuckled except some beady-eyed, literal-minded gal
near the back who was, I humorously imagine, too busy fingering Tarot
cards and muttering malevolent incantations to think it through.

- Whippersnapper

"If your mind's gone blank, I have some suggestions!"  -- Calvin


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
rgonnet  
View profile
 More options May 24 1998, 3:00 am
Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology
From: rgonnet <dictionna...@hol.fr>
Date: 1998/05/24
Subject: Re: Is it true?

WHIPPERSNAPPER wrote:

> In article <MPG.fcd7f4f6a05a33989...@nntp.lightlink.com>,
> Starshadow <starshad...@mindless.com> wrote:

> >... I heard from his [LRH's] own lips that he started the
> >whole thing as a scam. I guess that he was lying, though, or maybe I was
> >lying and somehow all the people at Norwescon One were lying that heard
> >him say the same thing.

Yes , and his own kin allegated it. See the affidavit of
Junior, if you don't believe it.

R


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Rob Clark  
View profile
 More options May 24 1998, 3:00 am
Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology
From: x...@mindspring.com (Rob Clark)
Date: 1998/05/24
Subject: Re: Is it true?

On 24 May 1998 14:10:15 EDT, Whips...@cris.com (WHIPPERSNAPPER) wrote:

>In article <MPG.fcd7f4f6a05a33989...@nntp.lightlink.com>,
>Starshadow <starshad...@mindless.com> wrote:
>>... I heard from his [LRH's] own lips that he started the
>>whole thing as a scam. I guess that he was lying, though, or maybe I was
>>lying and somehow all the people at Norwescon One were lying that heard
>>him say the same thing.
>I first saw this statement from StartAtShadows years ago on a small
>bulletin-board network.  I questioned it then and got nothing but smoke.

unless she recorded it, what the hell was she supposed to produce, you
moron?  spirit recordings?

>It is a unique claim I have seen nowhere else and she has never presented
>the slightest proof or corroboration.

it is by no means unique.

you are a liar.

From: lind...@esl.cs.colorado.edu (Don Lindsay)
Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology,alt.answers,news.answers
Subject: non-scientologist faq on "Start a Religion"
Date: 25 Aug 1995 02:37:22 GMT

Summary: L. Ron Hubbard is widely rumored to have said
        "The way to make a million dollars is to start a religion."

L. Ron Hubbard is widely rumored to have said "The way to make a
million
dollars is to start a religion."  There are also variant rumors.  For
some reason, this is often mentioned on Usenet.  Evidence is discussed
below, but the short answer is that it's almost certainly true.

The Church of Scientology has actually taken German publishers to
court
for printing this story. _Stern_ won (see below).

One form of the rumor is that L. Ron Hubbard made a bar bet with
Robert
A. Heinlein. This is definitely not true.  It's uncharacteristic of
Heinlein, and there's no supporting evidence.  There is, however,
inconclusive evidence that Robert Heinlein suggested some parts of the
original _Dianetics_.

Another variant is that Hubbard talked of starting a religion to avoid
taxes. Jay Kay Klein reports that Hubbard said this in 1947.

The Church's media guide tells reporters that the rumor is confused,
and
that it was George Orwell who said it.  In 1938, Orwell did write "But
I
have always thought there might be a lot of cash in starting a new
religion...".  However, Robert Vaughn Young, who was Scientology's
spokesman for 20 years, says that Hubbard learned about the Orwell
quote
from _him_.  Young further states that he met three people who could
remember Hubbard saying more-or-less the famous quote.  Nor did
Hubbard
write a rebuttal of the rumor -- Young claims to have ghost-written
the
rebuttal in the Rocky Mountain News interview.

I found the following in books about Hubbard and Scientology:

"Whenever he was talking about being hard up he often used to say
that he thought the easiest way to make money would be to start a
religion."
 -- reporter Neison Himmel: quoted in _Bare Faced Messiah_** p.117
from 1986
 interview.  Himmel shared a room with LRH, briefly, Pasadena, fall
1945.

** _Bare-Faced Messiah, The True Story of L. Ron Hubbard_, by Russell
Miller (N.Y.: Henry Holt & Co., 1987) ISBN 0-8050-0654-0. $19.95
London:
Michael Joeseph Penguin Book Ltd, 1987. See the Access FAQ for
reviews.

"I always knew he was exceedingly anxious to hit big money - he used
to say he thought the best way to do it would be to start a cult."
 -- Sam Merwin, then the editor of the _Thrilling_ SF magazines:
 quoted in _Bare Faced Messiah_ p.133 from 1986 interview. Winter of
1946/47.

"Around this time he was invited to address a science fiction group
in Newark hosted by the writer, Sam Moskowitz. `Writing for a penny
a word is ridiculous,' he told the meeting. `If a man really wanted
to make a million dollars, the best way to do it would be start his
own religion.'
 -- _Bare Faced Messiah_ p.148. Reference given to LA Times, 27 Aug
78.
 Supposed to have happened in spring 1949.

"Science fiction editor and author Sam Moscowitz tells of the occasion
when Hubbard spoke before the Eastern Science Fiction Association
in Newark, New Jersey in 1947:
`Hubbard spoke ... I don't recall his exact words; but in effect,
he told us that writing science fiction for about a penny a word
was no way to make a living. If you really want to make a million,
he said, the quickest way is to start your own religion.'"
 -- _Messiah or Madman_***, p.45. No reference given. Yes, the
spelling
 of Sam's name differs: this book got it wrong, it has a "k". I
 don't know why the two books disagree by two years.

 (Oddly, the same misspelling occurs in _The dangerous new cult of
 Scientology_, by Arlene and Howard Eisenberg, Parents Magazine, June
 1969, pages 48-49 and 82-86. From this and other similarities, it
 seems likely that Corydon is quoting the Eisenberg article, rather
 than quoting Moskowitz directly.)

*** _L. Ron Hubbard: Messiah or Madman?_ -- by Bent Corydon and L. Ron
Hubbard Jr.  a.k.a. Ronald DeWolf.(Secaucus, NJ: Lyle Stuart, 1987)
ISBN 0-8184-0444-2 In 1992, from Barricade Books, dist. by Publishers
Group West, $12.95  See the Access FAQ for reviews.

 _The Encyclopedia of Science Fiction_ lists Sam Moskowitz as the
first
good historian of science fiction [among other things]. In 1994
Moskowitz wrote an affidavit which states: "After speaking for about
an
hour at the meeting, Mr. Hubbard answered questions from the
audience. He made the following statement in response to a question
about making money from writing: `You don't get rich writing science
fiction. If you want to get rich, you start a religion.'"

The affidavit states that this was the 7 Nov 1948 meeting of the
Eastern
Science Fiction Association, of which Moskowitz was the director.

Now, there is a problem with the three Moskowitz reports.
Specifically,
the Church obtained affidavits in 1993 from David A. Kyle and Jay Kay
Klein.  Both names are well-known in science fiction, and both say
that
they went to the 7 Nov 1948 talk by Hubbard.  Both say that they
didn't
hear any such statement.  Puzzling.

I believe that these dueling affidavits have met in court.  _Stern_, a
German magazine, was sued by the Church, and the suit was thrown out
of court after they obtained the Moskowitz affidavit.

On 9apr94, jitt...@gumby.cs.caltech.edu (Mike Jittlov) posted:
        <about a conversation with Theodore Sturgeon>

>Back in the 1940's, L. Ron Hubbard was a member of the Los Angeles
>Science Fantasy Society (when its old clubhouse was just north of
>Wilshire Blvd).  Ted vividly recalled being a few yards from Hubbard,
>when he became testy with someone there and retorted, "Y'know, we're
>all wasting our time writing this hack science fiction!  You wanta
>make _real_ money, you gotta start a _religion_!

>Though I didn't ask, I think Ted would've mentioned it if the second
>person was Heinlein or another author of note.  He had an extremely
>accurate memory, and I'd trust Sturgeon over anyone else's account.

Reportedly Sturgeon also told this story to others.  Theodore Sturgeon
was one of the truly great science fiction writers, and someone whose
word and memories were trusted.  (John W. Campbell commented that
Sturgeon should have written the definitive history of SF fandom.)
Mike Jittlov is a respected Hollywood filmmaker and stopmotion actor,
and can be found on the net at "alt.fan.mike-jittlov".

Lloyd Arthur Eshbach was a science fiction writer and publisher
between
1929 and 1957. His autobiography, _Over My Shoulder: Reflections of
the
Science Fiction Era_ ( Oswald Train: Publisher, Phila. 1983, limited
edition) says on pages 125 and 126 (about the events of 1948 and
1949):

        I think of the time while in New York I took John W. Campbell
        Marty Greenberg, and L. Ron Hubbard to lunch.  Someone
suggested
        a Swedish smorgasbord, and I had my first--and last--taste of
        kidney.  Yuck!  Afterward we wound up in my hotel room for
        related conversation.

        The incident is stamped indelibly in my mind because of one
        statement that Ron Hubbard made.  What led him to say what he
        did I can't recall--but in so many words Hubbard said:

        "I'd like to start a religion.  That's where the money is!"

Eshbach based his autobiography on detailed records and dated diary
entries, and is therefore likely to be quite accurate on this point.

Harlan Ellison is a science fiction author and movie scriptwriter.  In
an interview ****, he has said such things as "I was there the night
L. Ron Hubbard invented [Dianetics]". However, I have decided not to
give Ellison's version of the famous Hubbard quote, nor am I counting
Ellison in my witness list. I respect Mr. Ellison, but after much
discussion on "rec.arts.sf.written", it became clear that some
well-informed science fiction fans do not take Mr. Ellison's words
literally. He does not necessarily keep history and storytelling
separate.

**** _The Saturday Evening Wings_, Nov-Dec 1978, p.32. Reportedly
Ellison also said similar things in _TIME OUT_, UK, no. 332.

Reportedly, a Vonnegut biography mentions the Hubbard quote. If anyone
can find an exact reference, I would appreciate email. Similarly,
L. Sprague de Camp is reported to have said something in his handbook
on writing science fiction. Randall Garrett also supposedly talked
about this. Again, I would appreciate email.

To summarize: we have eight witnesses: Neison Himmel, Sam Merwin, Sam
Moskowitz, Theodore Sturgeon, Lloyd Arthur Eshbach, and the three
unnamed witnesses of Robert Vaughn Young.  There is some confusion and
doubt about one of the five (Sam Moskowitz).  Two are reported via
Russel Miller: one is reported via Mike Jittlov: one reported in his
autobiography; and one reported in an affidavit.  The reports describe
different events, meaning that Hubbard said it at least five times, in
five different venues - definitely not just once.  And the Church's
official disclaimer is now reportedly a flat lie.

Conclusion: He definitely said it (and more than once).


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Pimoty  
View profile
 More options May 24 1998, 3:00 am
Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology
From: pim...@aol.com (Pimoty)
Date: 1998/05/24
Subject: Re: Is it true?

WHippersnapper: The obvious conclusion is that StirredShadows is lying.

WS: I first saw this statement from StartAtShadows years ago on a small
bulletin-board network. >>

Why the name calling dear Whipper, after all if Starshadows is lying, should
you not need the ad-hominem fallacy ?
+++
For additional info:
     http://www.xenu.net
     http://www.entheta.net
     http://www.lermanet.com/cos/yanny.html


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Hud Nordin  
View profile
 More options May 24 1998, 3:00 am
Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology
From: h...@netcom.com (Hud Nordin)
Date: 1998/05/24
Subject: Re: Is it true?

Regarding multiple documented occurences of such as:

"Whenever [Hubbard] was talking about being hard up he often used to say
that he thought the easiest way to make money would be to start a
religion."
 -- reporter Neison Himmel: quoted in _Bare Faced Messiah_** p.117 from 1986
 interview.  Himmel shared a room with LRH, briefly, Pasadena, fall 1945.

In article <3568655c.23330...@news.mindspring.com> x...@mindspring.com (Rob Clark) writes:
>To summarize: we have eight witnesses: Neison Himmel, Sam Merwin, Sam
>Moskowitz, Theodore Sturgeon, Lloyd Arthur Eshbach, and the three
>unnamed witnesses of Robert Vaughn Young.  There is some confusion and
>doubt about one of the five (Sam Moskowitz).  Two are reported via
>Russel Miller: one is reported via Mike Jittlov: one reported in his
>autobiography; and one reported in an affidavit.  The reports describe
>different events, meaning that Hubbard said it at least five times, in
>five different venues - definitely not just once.  And the Church's
>official disclaimer is now reportedly a flat lie.

As the Haikumatic once put it:

  Start a cult; get rich.
  Hubbard not only said it --
  He also did it.

>Conclusion: He definitely said it (and more than once).

Further conclusion: He definitely did it (Thankfully, just once).

--
Hud Nordin <h...@netcom.com> Silicon Valley / The City of Sunnyvale / California


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Rob Clark  
View profile
 More options May 24 1998, 3:00 am
Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology
From: x...@mindspring.com (Rob Clark)
Date: 1998/05/24
Subject: Re: Is it true?

On 24 May 1998 19:28:28 GMT, pim...@aol.com (Pimoty) wrote:

>WHippersnapper: The obvious conclusion is that StirredShadows is lying.
>Why the name calling dear Whipper, after all if Starshadows is lying, should
>you not need the ad-hominem fallacy ?

well for the obvious reason.  it is not starshadow that is lying.

whapper is, as usual, lying his ass off like the cultist clam he is.

From: lind...@esl.cs.colorado.edu (Don Lindsay)
Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology,alt.answers,news.answers
Subject: non-scientologist faq on "Start a Religion"
Date: 25 Aug 1995 02:37:22 GMT

Summary: L. Ron Hubbard is widely rumored to have said
        "The way to make a million dollars is to start a religion."

L. Ron Hubbard is widely rumored to have said "The way to make a
million
dollars is to start a religion."  There are also variant rumors.  For
some reason, this is often mentioned on Usenet.  Evidence is discussed
below, but the short answer is that it's almost certainly true.

The Church of Scientology has actually taken German publishers to
court
for printing this story. _Stern_ won (see below).

One form of the rumor is that L. Ron Hubbard made a bar bet with
Robert
A. Heinlein. This is definitely not true.  It's uncharacteristic of
Heinlein, and there's no supporting evidence.  There is, however,
inconclusive evidence that Robert Heinlein suggested some parts of the
original _Dianetics_.

Another variant is that Hubbard talked of starting a religion to avoid
taxes. Jay Kay Klein reports that Hubbard said this in 1947.

The Church's media guide tells reporters that the rumor is confused,
and
that it was George Orwell who said it.  In 1938, Orwell did write "But
I
have always thought there might be a lot of cash in starting a new
religion...".  However, Robert Vaughn Young, who was Scientology's
spokesman for 20 years, says that Hubbard learned about the Orwell
quote
from _him_.  Young further states that he met three people who could
remember Hubbard saying more-or-less the famous quote.  Nor did
Hubbard
write a rebuttal of the rumor -- Young claims to have ghost-written
the
rebuttal in the Rocky Mountain News interview.

I found the following in books about Hubbard and Scientology:

"Whenever he was talking about being hard up he often used to say
that he thought the easiest way to make money would be to start a
religion."
 -- reporter Neison Himmel: quoted in _Bare Faced Messiah_** p.117
from 1986
 interview.  Himmel shared a room with LRH, briefly, Pasadena, fall
1945.

** _Bare-Faced Messiah, The True Story of L. Ron Hubbard_, by Russell
Miller (N.Y.: Henry Holt & Co., 1987) ISBN 0-8050-0654-0. $19.95
London:
Michael Joeseph Penguin Book Ltd, 1987. See the Access FAQ for
reviews.

"I always knew he was exceedingly anxious to hit big money - he used
to say he thought the best way to do it would be to start a cult."
 -- Sam Merwin, then the editor of the _Thrilling_ SF magazines:
 quoted in _Bare Faced Messiah_ p.133 from 1986 interview. Winter of
1946/47.

"Around this time he was invited to address a science fiction group
in Newark hosted by the writer, Sam Moskowitz. `Writing for a penny
a word is ridiculous,' he told the meeting. `If a man really wanted
to make a million dollars, the best way to do it would be start his
own religion.'
 -- _Bare Faced Messiah_ p.148. Reference given to LA Times, 27 Aug
78.
 Supposed to have happened in spring 1949.

"Science fiction editor and author Sam Moscowitz tells of the occasion
when Hubbard spoke before the Eastern Science Fiction Association
in Newark, New Jersey in 1947:
`Hubbard spoke ... I don't recall his exact words; but in effect,
he told us that writing science fiction for about a penny a word
was no way to make a living. If you really want to make a million,
he said, the quickest way is to start your own religion.'"
 -- _Messiah or Madman_***, p.45. No reference given. Yes, the
spelling
 of Sam's name differs: this book got it wrong, it has a "k". I
 don't know why the two books disagree by two years.

 (Oddly, the same misspelling occurs in _The dangerous new cult of
 Scientology_, by Arlene and Howard Eisenberg, Parents Magazine, June
 1969, pages 48-49 and 82-86. From this and other similarities, it
 seems likely that Corydon is quoting the Eisenberg article, rather
 than quoting Moskowitz directly.)

*** _L. Ron Hubbard: Messiah or Madman?_ -- by Bent Corydon and L. Ron
Hubbard Jr.  a.k.a. Ronald DeWolf.(Secaucus, NJ: Lyle Stuart, 1987)
ISBN 0-8184-0444-2 In 1992, from Barricade Books, dist. by Publishers
Group West, $12.95  See the Access FAQ for reviews.

 _The Encyclopedia of Science Fiction_ lists Sam Moskowitz as the
first
good historian of science fiction [among other things]. In 1994
Moskowitz wrote an affidavit which states: "After speaking for about
an
hour at the meeting, Mr. Hubbard answered questions from the
audience. He made the following statement in response to a question
about making money from writing: `You don't get rich writing science
fiction. If you want to get rich, you start a religion.'"

The affidavit states that this was the 7 Nov 1948 meeting of the
Eastern
Science Fiction Association, of which Moskowitz was the director.

Now, there is a problem with the three Moskowitz reports.
Specifically,
the Church obtained affidavits in 1993 from David A. Kyle and Jay Kay
Klein.  Both names are well-known in science fiction, and both say
that
they went to the 7 Nov 1948 talk by Hubbard.  Both say that they
didn't
hear any such statement.  Puzzling.

I believe that these dueling affidavits have met in court.  _Stern_, a
German magazine, was sued by the Church, and the suit was thrown out
of court after they obtained the Moskowitz affidavit.

On 9apr94, jitt...@gumby.cs.caltech.edu (Mike Jittlov) posted:
        <about a conversation with Theodore Sturgeon>

>Back in the 1940's, L. Ron Hubbard was a member of the Los Angeles
>Science Fantasy Society (when its old clubhouse was just north of
>Wilshire Blvd).  Ted vividly recalled being a few yards from Hubbard,
>when he became testy with someone there and retorted, "Y'know, we're
>all wasting our time writing this hack science fiction!  You wanta
>make _real_ money, you gotta start a _religion_!

>Though I didn't ask, I think Ted would've mentioned it if the second
>person was Heinlein or another author of note.  He had an extremely
>accurate memory, and I'd trust Sturgeon over anyone else's account.

Reportedly Sturgeon also told this story to others.  Theodore Sturgeon
was one of the truly great science fiction writers, and someone whose
word and memories were trusted.  (John W. Campbell commented that
Sturgeon should have written the definitive history of SF fandom.)
Mike Jittlov is a respected Hollywood filmmaker and stopmotion actor,
and can be found on the net at "alt.fan.mike-jittlov".

Lloyd Arthur Eshbach was a science fiction writer and publisher
between
1929 and 1957. His autobiography, _Over My Shoulder: Reflections of
the
Science Fiction Era_ ( Oswald Train: Publisher, Phila. 1983, limited
edition) says on pages 125 and 126 (about the events of 1948 and
1949):

        I think of the time while in New York I took John W. Campbell
        Marty Greenberg, and L. Ron Hubbard to lunch.  Someone
suggested
        a Swedish smorgasbord, and I had my first--and last--taste of
        kidney.  Yuck!  Afterward we wound up in my hotel room for
        related conversation.

        The incident is stamped indelibly in my mind because of one
        statement that Ron Hubbard made.  What led him to say what he
        did I can't recall--but in so many words Hubbard said:

        "I'd like to start a religion.  That's where the money is!"

Eshbach based his autobiography on detailed records and dated diary
entries, and is therefore likely to be quite accurate on this point.

Harlan Ellison is a science fiction author and movie scriptwriter.  In
an interview ****, he has said such things as "I was there the night
L. Ron Hubbard invented [Dianetics]". However, I have decided not to
give Ellison's version of the famous Hubbard quote, nor am I counting
Ellison in my witness list. I respect Mr. Ellison, but after much
discussion on "rec.arts.sf.written", it became clear that some
well-informed science fiction fans do not take Mr. Ellison's words
literally. He does not necessarily keep history and storytelling
separate.

**** _The Saturday Evening Wings_, Nov-Dec 1978, p.32. Reportedly
Ellison also said similar things in _TIME OUT_, UK, no. 332.

Reportedly, a Vonnegut biography mentions the Hubbard quote. If anyone
can find an exact reference, I would appreciate email. Similarly,
L. Sprague de Camp is reported to have said something in his handbook
on writing science fiction. Randall Garrett also supposedly talked
about this. Again, I would appreciate email.

To summarize: we have eight witnesses: Neison Himmel, Sam Merwin, Sam
Moskowitz, Theodore Sturgeon, Lloyd Arthur Eshbach, and the three
unnamed witnesses of Robert Vaughn Young.  There is some confusion and
doubt about one of the five (Sam Moskowitz).  Two are reported via
Russel Miller: one is reported via Mike Jittlov: one reported in his
autobiography; and one reported in an affidavit.  The reports describe
different events, meaning that Hubbard said it at least five times, in
five different venues - definitely not just once.  And the Church's
official disclaimer is now reportedly a flat lie.

Conclusion: He definitely said it (and more than once).


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
William Barwell  
View profile
 More options May 25 1998, 3:00 am
Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology
From: wbarw...@Starbase.NeoSoft.COM (William Barwell)
Date: 1998/05/25
Subject: Re: Is it true?

In article <6k9nq7$...@examiner.concentric.net>,

WHIPPERSNAPPER <Whips...@cris.com> wrote:
>In article <MPG.fcd7f4f6a05a33989...@nntp.lightlink.com>,
>Starshadow <starshad...@mindless.com> wrote:

>>... I heard from his [LRH's] own lips that he started the
>>whole thing as a scam. I guess that he was lying, though, or maybe I was
>>lying and somehow all the people at Norwescon One were lying that heard
>>him say the same thing.

>I first saw this statement from StartAtShadows years ago on a small
>bulletin-board network.  I questioned it then and got nothing but smoke.
>It is a unique claim I have seen nowhere else and she has never presented
>the slightest proof or corroboration.

Numerous SF authors have also heard Elron babble this same
sort of sentiment, a habit Hubbard started in college, as
an old college roommate has mentioned.

It was a stock Hubbardism.

No smoke, just the stark truth.
Elron scammed you and you still don't get it.
He tells the world for decades he wants to make
a million bucks and you don't get it.
He wrote that Scientology's 'religous status' is
a matter for "accountants and solicitors only" and you
still don't get it.
He calls his scam "The Bridge" and you buy it.

Obnosis isn't your strongest ability, is it?

Pope Charles
SubGenius Pope Of Houston
Slack!


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Mark W Brehob  
View profile
 More options May 25 1998, 3:00 am
Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology
From: bre...@cps.msu.edu (Mark W Brehob)
Date: 1998/05/25
Subject: Re: Is it true?

Wolf (wolft...@micron.net) wrote:

: Mark W Brehob wrote:
: >
: > Wolf (wolft...@micron.net) wrote:

: <snip-rm group chat>

<and more snip.>

: > : least not in my mind. Nor does her attempt define the intentions and
: > : quality of thousands of CofS's members. To think otherwise - defining an
: > : entire class of people by the actions of a few - is mere prejudice and
: > : more a reflection of the haters intentions than the hated.
: >
: > Really?  I'd say that when someone who works for you does something
: > wrong it _does_ reflect on you.  Especially if you continue to
: > employ that person.

: Such things are a constantly shifting landscape. The potential for
: idiocy and criminality amongst the ranks of any organization rises in
: direct proportion the amount of members. CofS is no exception, not is
: the company you work for or the church or any groups you belong to.
: Straw man. This is an argument for grade schoolers.

I made no reference to _my_ place of work or _my_ church.  I made
a general comment about having resposiblity for those that work for
you.  I see no straw man.

: > Your use of the words "hate", "hater" etc. are
: > unneeded.  I do not hate the CoS.

: Provoking discussion of what, IMO, has become a seriously negative
: aspect of otherwise valid ARS criticism is much needed.

Agreed.

: > In fact if there was reform to
: > the point that:
: >         * No one else died for the same reasons Lisa M. died

: Apparently this is an isolated case. The eventual trial will bring out
: the facts. Are we forgetting that the justice system in America does
: indeed apply to Scn as well as the rest of us?

No I'm not forgeting that.  The problem is that the CoS has
not admitted any guilt in the matter.  They have not said
"we screwed up".  Thats a problem.  If they told the
rest of their membership "Don't do this, it is wrong" then
I would be much happier.

: >         * The CoS _stopped_ claiming to be compatible with
: >           Christianity.  (Or at least explained that LRH discounted
: >           the existence of Christ.)

: Ain't going to happen. Not in the forseeable future.
Agreed.  So it seems unlikely I'll be going away anytime soon.

: >         * Stopped harassing their critics.

: Why would they do that? This is the Scorpion and the Frog Mark. Despite
: the claims that they have discovered they are thetans, not humans, they
: are chained to the realities of their natures. As are you and I.

Perhaps.  However other religions and individuals behave _much_ better
than the CoS.  Are you are saying that this behavor comes from
their religion?  Or are you claiming this behavor is part of human
nature?

: >         * Stopped "protecting" its members from the real world.

: Huh? What is that supposed to mean? Your real world? Mine?
Sorry.  A good example might be the web-page agreement
they ask their members to sign.  They are then required to use
a "web-filter" which keeps them out of anti-CoS sites...

: > I would almost certainally cease to be a critic of the CoS.  In my mind
: > I have a responsibility to protest, yell and scream about those things
: > that can harm others.  Be it poorly handled meat at the supermarket or
: > anything else.

: Seems reasonable to me. Within that statement lies some fo the logic as
: to why I vote, despite knowing I'll eventually be betrayed by my
: candidate.

*LAUGH*
:  
: <snip>

: > : Whatever value ARS does have in reforming or changing the
: > : CofS is seriously limited by the fact that this NG has itself evolved
: > : into a forum for blind displays of hatred and prejudice.
: >
: > It is a forum for that, again on both sides.  However it is also
: > a forum for thoughtful discussion; valid criticism, and other
: > good things.  Newsgroups are that way.  Everyone has a voice.
: > Even you.

: Yep. But then, your enemies would indeed look pretty foolish if they
: were the only ones acting like lunatics.

I know.  I wish it were so.

: > Always take the high ground, whether in war or debate.

: Unless the low ground is cheaper, faster and more effective :~D

: Wolf

Mark


    Reply to author    Forward