She's been posting about Grady to groups like alt.fashion.
--------
Subject: A very serious question- opinions sought From: jennyj...@aol.com (JennyJ686) Date: 1997/10/26 Message-ID: <19971026031900.XAA29026@ladder01.news.aol.com> Newsgroups: alt.fashion
alt.fashion seems to be one of the few newsgroups where posts by women are in the majority.
With this in mind I have a very serious question to pose.
Below you will find an edited version of a post that resulted in the termination of a man's account by his internet service provider, Tidepool.com.
The individual complained that he was censored and that the ISP had no right to close his account. He threatened suit so his ISP decided to let netizens register their opinions on this subject.
EDITED VERSION OF POSTING ON NEWSGROUP WITH PERSONAL NAMES AND IDENTIFYING INFORMATION REMOVED: ************************************************************** "Subject: Re: Whore!! Shit-Vagina Whore!!
>I am talking to you, you shit-vagina whore! >She shudders with involuntary pleasure every time you >describe her that way.... Yes, I know she complains ... >but that's just for appearances. She is really getting wet >down there thinking about her children looking up their >mom on the Internet and finding "shit-vagina whore" >accompanying it. ... Then their grandchildren. Forever. ... >Shit-vagina 'ho. .... >Sooner or later her kids will start detesting her for what >she is doing to their future. What a weakling, ... >They spit on her wrinkled face. They teach their children >to defecate on her ... >Even ... won't fuck her when she is eventually offloaded. >What a disgusting bitch.
....
.... >Because the shit-vagina 'ho is a complete and utter >weakling, fool, ... She is suppressive to the top of her >soon-to-be-inoperative fallopian tubes. Menopause won't >come too soon for that bitch. What a hairy gelatinous >scab in the filthy drain of the gene pool. >You, shit vagina-whore, are a laughing stock.
>Internationally. Forever. >Keep bending over and spreading 'em, ... A LOT more to come!"
-- Rod Keller / rkel...@voicenet.com / Irresponsible Publisher Black Hat #1 / Expert of the Toilet / Golden Gate Bridge Club The Lerma Apologist / Merchant of Chaos / Kha Khan countdown: 9 to go Killer Rod / OSA Patsy / Quasi-Scieno / Mental Bully
: She's been posting about Grady to groups like alt.fashion.
Will the clams *never* learn? This is stupid beyond belief. The followup which I will do right now is to post the URL for Jeff's Lisa page. Keith Henson
In article <633cfu$...@netaxs.com>, rkel...@netaxs.com says...
>wgert (wg...@loop.com) wrote: >: rkel...@netaxs.com (Rod Keller) wrote: >: >She's been posting about Grady to groups like alt.fashion. >: >: And ... what's your point? Are you know the usenet censor?
>My point is to inform people about Jenny, the AOL clam. Her post is >on-topic for a.r.s. I find it particularly interesting that she chose to >post it to an off-topic newsgroup. I could have suggested a dozen >newsgroups that would be more appropriate,
But you didn't. Its not so safe as the expected canned answers from ARSCC.
>but she chose alt.fashion. I >find that amusing, that she would post an off-topic message to complain >about Grady, who was falsely accused of being off-topic.
Where did Jenny mentions Grady's name? The only person that mentioned Grady's name on alt.fashion is Warrior.
What she did was attempt to get some opinions from people who don't have a vested interest in the outcome.
: rkel...@netaxs.com (Rod Keller) wrote: : >She's been posting about Grady to groups like alt.fashion. : : And ... what's your point? Are you know the usenet censor?
My point is to inform people about Jenny, the AOL clam. Her post is on-topic for a.r.s. I find it particularly interesting that she chose to post it to an off-topic newsgroup. I could have suggested a dozen newsgroups that would be more appropriate, but she chose alt.fashion. I find that amusing, that she would post an off-topic message to complain about Grady, who was falsely accused of being off-topic.
I can't imagine how reposting her message to a.r.s can be considered censorship. How silly.
-- Rod Keller / rkel...@voicenet.com / Irresponsible Publisher Black Hat #1 / Expert of the Toilet / Golden Gate Bridge Club The Lerma Apologist / Merchant of Chaos / Kha Khan countdown: 9 to go Killer Rod / OSA Patsy / Quasi-Scieno / Mental Bully
: In article <633cfu$...@netaxs.com>, rkel...@netaxs.com says... : >My point is to inform people about Jenny, the AOL clam. Her post is : >on-topic for a.r.s. I find it particularly interesting that she chose to : >post it to an off-topic newsgroup. I could have suggested a dozen : >newsgroups that would be more appropriate, : : But you didn't. Its not so safe as the expected canned answers from ARSCC.
But who knew she was looking for groups to post to? I hereby offer to suggest appropriate newsgroups to any Scientologist who wants to post about Scientology. Email me at rkel...@voicenet.com
alt.fashion will never be one of the suggestions.
: >but she chose alt.fashion. I : >find that amusing, that she would post an off-topic message to complain : >about Grady, who was falsely accused of being off-topic. : : Where did Jenny mentions Grady's name? The only person that mentioned Grady's : name on alt.fashion is Warrior. : : What she did was attempt to get some opinions from people who don't have a : vested interest in the outcome.
It's irrelevant that she didn't mention Grady's name, the post is about Grady. I think that makes it a little dishonest, not mentioning the person she is complaining about.
"Vested" interest means monetary interest, no? Nobody here has a vested interest, except Grady. Scientology wants to get a judgment against him. Fat chance, since I don't think they have a shred of evidence.
-- Rod Keller / rkel...@voicenet.com / Irresponsible Publisher Black Hat #1 / Expert of the Toilet / Golden Gate Bridge Club The Lerma Apologist / Merchant of Chaos / Kha Khan countdown: 9 to go Killer Rod / OSA Patsy / Quasi-Scieno / Mental Bully
>>Where did Jenny mentions Grady's name? The only person that mentioned >>Grady's >>name on alt.fashion is Warrior.
>Way to go Warrior! >Complain to his ISP, Grady.
>Amigo
Hey! They're tag-teaming! PLight, RonsA AND wgert! Well done! Now, do you think you could enter into some real comm about your chosen faith?
Do you think it was ethically correct (I'm not using a scientology definition of ethics here) for scientology to move into Clearwater, Florida under the guise of United Churches of Florida and Southern Land Development and Leasing to prevent people from knowing who they really were?
Do scientologists always lie like this?
Is it correct scientology teaching to lie to get what you want?
> : > : Where did Jenny mentions Grady's name? The only person that mentioned Grady's > : name on alt.fashion is Warrior. > : > : What she did was attempt to get some opinions from people who don't have a > : vested interest in the outcome.
> It's irrelevant that she didn't mention Grady's name, the post is about > Grady. I think that makes it a little dishonest, not mentioning the person > she is complaining about.
Interesting, because in the "washington" letter about the kids, Grady wasn't mentioned either. Someone then posted a followup, mistinterpreting whose children were being talked about.
pli...@rocketmail.com wrote: > What she did was attempt to get some opinions from people who don't have a > vested interest in the outcome.
...and who, no doubt, couldn't care less about the outcome, because it's completely inappropriate for the newsgroup to which she posted; i.e., she did precisely what wgert accused Grady Ward of doing. We can now expect wgert to send a message to AOL asking them to close her account, right?
> Way to go Warrior! > Complain to his ISP, Grady.
Who wrote this anyway? What happened to the real ronamigo? Did he turn into a xenuamigo?
Joe Cisar
reply to: iy...@cleveland.freenet.edu Xenu Mania http://www.innernet.net/joecisar/conmenu.htm The biggest men with the biggest ideas can be shot down by the smallest men with the smallest minds. Think big anyway.
In article <632vd9$8l...@usenet48.supernews.com>, wg...@loop.com (wgert) wrote: >rkel...@netaxs.com (Rod Keller) wrote:
>>She's been posting about Grady to groups like alt.fashion.
>And ... what's your point? Are you know the usenet censor?
He wasn't "censoring" the whacked-out, brain-dead cultie's posts; he was speading them around so even more people can see what a lying, snivelling little turd she is - the exact opposite of censorship, you toad.
-- Cogito, ergo sum. Use "Xenu" in Subject: line of email.
In article <19971030075501.CAA10...@ladder01.news.aol.com>,
mikesmi...@aol.com (MikeSmith3) wrote: >On 29 Oct 1997 20:22:29 -0800, mart...@islandnet.com (Martin Hunt) wrote: >>He wasn't "censoring" the whacked-out, brain-dead cultie's >>posts; he was speading them around so even more people >>can see what a lying, snivelling little turd she is - the exact >>opposite of censorship, you toad.
>You sure you used enough adjectives there, Butch?
Actually, "cultie", "turd" and "toad" are nouns; better re-do your Key to Life course, Mike. <snicker>
-- Cogito, ergo sum. Use "Xenu" in Subject: line of email. . . . . . .
