> In 1974, the blatant breaking of another person's will - > "break 'em down, build 'em back up" - was implemented by > Hubbard as an official "Church" institution: The > Rehabilitation Project Force.
> The RPF is essentially a punitive slave-labor prison for > $cientology staff considered to be unproductive, > disobedient, or security risks. Inmates eat leftover food > scraps, without utensils, after non-RPF staff finish > eating, and are not allowed to speak to them unless first > spoken to. They are then only to answer briefly, always > addressing their betters as "sir." RPFers are dressed in > uniform overalls and have to run wherever they go. Their > quarters are the worst - often filthy and roach-infested. > The RPF continues to this day as one of several parts of > the "Church" of $cientology hidden from "public PCs" and > "wogs" (outsiders).
> According to $cientology dogma, confining someone in the > RPF is a benevolent act. RPFers are considered insane, > loaded with "evil purposes" causing them to commit "overts" > (harmful acts), and therefore they have many "withholds" > (undisclosed overts). The RPF is their last chance at > redemption.
> Some that have left $cientology after being RPFed tell of > having to fabricate overts, writing them up to appease the > Ethics Officer, to prove they were being rehabiliated. A > common reason for being RPFed is the decision to leave the > cult. According to Hubbard: "People leave because of their > own overts and withholds. The only reason anyone has ever > left Scientology is because people failed to find out about > them." By this reasoning, the Jews fled Nazi Germany > because of their hidden offenses against Hitler.
> The degree of degradation experienced in the RPF is > difficult to comprehend. Hubbard, GOD to a believing > $cientologist, in effect is telling you that you are > subhuman, evil, degraded. Long periods of confinement at > hard labor, with poor nutrition, little sleep, and no > toilet facilities are common practice. According to former > Hubbard aide Gerald Armstrong: "There is no way to really > describe the RPF experience, the hopelessness, the > humiliation, the horror. It seemed to go on forever, the > days all identical, no time to oneself, the same blue > boiler suits like prison garb, day after day, the same > questions in the same endless security checks [gruelling > interrogation sessions on a lie-detecting e-meter]. > Hubbard's purpose in creating the RPF, running it as a > prison with assignees considered criminals, was the > breaking of peoples' wills, the total subjugation of anyone > he considered exhibited 'counter intention' to his goals. > He achieved his purpose with me so well that I thanked him > for the opportunity of doing the RPF, much like prisoners > of war, who are broken emotionally and spiritually through > deprivation and mind control techniques, thank their > captors."
> From THE CODE OF A SCIENTOLOGIST by L. Ron Hubbard:
> [This hypocritical "code" helps motivate $cientology's > fanatical opposition to psychiatry. It is an excellent > illustration of criminals diverting attention from themselves > with idealistic bullshit and by exposing the crimes of > others. We are supposed to think this crusading "church" is > above the very conduct it condemns in others.]
> 4) "To decry and do all I can to abolish any and all > abuses against life and mankind."
> 5) "To expose and help abolish any and all physically > damaging practices in the field of mental health."
> 7) "To bring about an atmosphere of safety and security in > the field of mental health by eradicating its abuses and > brutality."
> 20) "To make this world a saner better place."
> And $cientology's brutal, abusive RPF serves these > purposes??
You're missing out on something. Now the Scientology public will be queueing up to pay $10,000 for this RPF "ethics" rundown as part of the SuperPower Rundown.
Roland -- "I notice that we all believe that Venus has a methane atmosphere and is unlivable. I almost got run down by a freight locomotive the other day -- didn't look very uncivilized to me." - L. Ron Hubbard, "Between Lives Implants" lecture, SHSBC #317. 23 July 1963. http://www.xs4all.nl/~xemu/rams/Venusloc.ram
Isn't it a little funny that your concept of slave labor covers something where
the people involved spend 1/2 of their day doing study and counseling that other staff members only get to spend a little bit of each day on, but this activity is the most popular activity for all staff to do, one of the main benefits of being a staff member of the church
and
the other half of the day involves manual labor such as gardening, repair work, sweeping up, etc, all activities which are permitted, and even sought out, in society generally by teenage job seekers and others such as immigrants without any objection by regulatory agencies of the state.
Perhaps you also think having to wait in line for a meal consists of starvation torture, offering someone an unpadded chair to sit on is buttock torture, and so on.
Your general recitation of horrors indicates that at various times substandard conditions have been the case for RPF staff members. As to the credibility of the rest, one should simply consider the source, which appears to want to boil down to a few tales of substandard conditions and rude treatment what makes up several decades of various experiences under various management done by thousands of people who all have DIFFERENT experiences of the RPF.
= The a.r.s. prime directive: Make Jokes About Scientologist's Deaths=
Example, regarding Attorney Moxon and his UNFORTUNATE loss: "Maybe he believes there are no underground transformer vaults in Europe." (JB Lingerman)
> Isn't it a little funny that your concept of slave labor covers something where
> the people involved spend 1/2 of their day doing study and counseling that > other staff members only get to spend a little bit of each day on, but this > activity is the most popular activity for all staff to do, one of the main > benefits of being a staff member of the church
> and
> the other half of the day involves manual labor such as gardening, repair work, > sweeping up, etc, all activities which are permitted, and even sought out, in > society generally by teenage job seekers and others such as immigrants without > any objection by regulatory agencies of the state.
> Perhaps you also think having to wait in line for a meal consists of starvation > torture, offering someone an unpadded chair to sit on is buttock torture, and > so on.
> Your general recitation of horrors indicates that at various times substandard > conditions have been the case for RPF staff members. As to the credibility of > the rest, one should simply consider the source, which appears to want to boil > down to a few tales of substandard conditions and rude treatment what makes up > several decades of various experiences under various management done by > thousands of people who all have DIFFERENT experiences of the RPF.
> = The a.r.s. prime directive: Make Jokes About Scientologist's Deaths=
> Example, regarding Attorney Moxon and his UNFORTUNATE loss: "Maybe he > believes there are no underground transformer vaults in Europe." (JB > Lingerman)
Na, he's just looking for a cut-price one so his son can do the Transformer Vault Rundown on the cheap.
Roland -- "I notice that we all believe that Venus has a methane atmosphere and is unlivable. I almost got run down by a freight locomotive the other day -- didn't look very uncivilized to me." - L. Ron Hubbard, "Between Lives Implants" lecture, SHSBC #317. 23 July 1963. http://www.xs4all.nl/~xemu/rams/Venusloc.ram
> Isn't it a little funny that your concept of slave labor covers something where
> the people involved spend 1/2 of their day doing study and counseling that > other staff members only get to spend a little bit of each day on, but this > activity is the most popular activity for all staff to do, one of the main > benefits of being a staff member of the church
> and
> the other half of the day involves manual labor such as gardening, repair work, > sweeping up, etc, all activities which are permitted, and even sought out, in > society generally by teenage job seekers and others such as immigrants without > any objection by regulatory agencies of the state.
> Perhaps you also think having to wait in line for a meal consists of starvation > torture, offering someone an unpadded chair to sit on is buttock torture, and > so on.
> Your general recitation of horrors indicates that at various times substandard > conditions have been the case for RPF staff members. As to the credibility of > the rest, one should simply consider the source, which appears to want to boil > down to a few tales of substandard conditions and rude treatment what makes up > several decades of various experiences under various management done by > thousands of people who all have DIFFERENT experiences of the RPF.
> = The a.r.s. prime directive: Make Jokes About Scientologist's Deaths=
> Example, regarding Attorney Moxon and his UNFORTUNATE loss: "Maybe he > believes there are no underground transformer vaults in Europe." (JB > Lingerman)
Kymus-
please. The above working conditions you describe were SOUGHT OUT by the people you describe. Not forced upon them as punitive justice. The course work you describe is not typically the material a scientologist wants to study, but KSW materials, Command Chain materials, and Ethics issues. They are subjected to Sec Checking under duress. They CANNOT LEAVE.
Surely you can see that this is a human rights violation? If not slavery, it is imprisonment and psychological torture, accompanied by total disconnection from their families and friends. Almost enough to induce first circuit shock, sometimes actually passing that threshhold. Would you condone this?
On 18 Mar 2001 09:02:44 GMT, kymus2...@aol.comnospam (Kymus) wrote:
>>From: lcs Mixmaster Remailer m...@anon.lcs.mit.edu >Your general recitation of horrors indicates that at various times substandard >conditions have been the case for RPF staff members. As to the credibility of >the rest, one should simply consider the source, which appears to want to boil >down to a few tales of substandard conditions and rude treatment what makes up >several decades of various experiences under various management done by >thousands of people who all have DIFFERENT experiences of the RPF.
Yes, one of which resulted in a multi-million dollar judgment against them. The treatment doled out in the RPF was found to be more than "rude." It was found, frankly and unequivocally, to be illegal and to justify a large financial penalty on the perpetrators of these illegal actions.
" Nonetheless, setting these problems aside, the fundamental problem with Scientology's argument is that we already have applied this "heightened scrutiny" to the activities for which Scientology claims constitutional protection. We found those activities did not qualify as "voluntary religious expression" or in some instances did not qualify as "religious expression" at all. (See Wollersheim v. Church of Scientology, supra, 212 Cal.App.3d at pp. 891-899, 260 Cal.Rptr. 331.) We already subjected these activities to "heightened scrutiny" and found them to lack constitutional protection under the free exercise of religion clause. Consequently, there is no reason to subject them to another round of "heightened scrutiny" in order to determine whether they are immune from punitive damages. The reason for "heightened scrutiny" of the punitive damage award evaporated with the finding the acts themselves were not constitutionally protected. Alternatively, even if we follow Scientology's request and subject the punitive damage award in this case to "heightened scrutiny" we arrive at the same conclusion as when we subjected the acts themselves to "heightened scrutiny." There is a compelling state interest in punishing and deterring this constitutionally unprotected, harmful conduct just as there is a compelling state interest in compensating the victims."
Brainwashing in the RPF is simply illegal, not constitutionally protected, does not constitute "voluntary religious expression" and in many cases does not constitute "religious expression" AT ALL.
>please. The above working conditions you describe were SOUGHT OUT by the >people you describe. Not forced upon them as punitive justice. The course >work you describe is not typically the material a scientologist wants to >study, but KSW materials, Command Chain materials, and Ethics issues. They >are subjected to Sec Checking under duress. They CANNOT LEAVE.
What you describe might be true of some people's RPF experience, and I have heard a few credible stories of people being actively physically detained in the RPF - Stacy Brooks for instance. I believe the bulk of RPF staff have remained due to moral constraints and not physical restraint. They are in the first place Sea Org members, a status they sought out with an understanding that it would become central to who they are and how they spend all their available time, indicating a preexisting high level of commitment to their faith and to enduring harsh conditions and meager rewards to promote it. They are in the second place able to avoid the RPF by leaving the Sea Org, and at least grudgingly acquiesce to RPF membership. You forget that few Scientology facilities are located outside urban areas, the RPF is working on grounds of major Sea Org facilities and can easily leave the grounds if that is what they choose, though they would face punitive treatment if they left and tried to come back. There appears to be some exception regarding the Gold base, though even there it is hardly a prison camp, just slightly more rural and subject to temptations to commit acts of detention or intimidation.
>Surely you can see that this is a human rights violation? If not slavery, >it is imprisonment and psychological torture, accompanied by total >disconnection from their families and friends.
No, I don't see that. Staff membership in the Sea Organization is founded on consensual relationships that terminate when the person wishing to terminate it decides. Consent eliminates violation.
RPFers have family time like other staff, are not imprisoned, and are not psycholoigcally tortured by RPF activities to any greater extent than they are psychologically tortured by the fact of existing in an apparently pointless universe filled with suffering, i.e. suffer the common human condition, or by undergoing counseling which exposes one's flaws and penetrates and defeats one's illadaptive defenses, in the manner some psychotherapy does. If reality therapy, gestalt, psychoanalysis, etc. are all torture then I'd accept that the RPF is too. Since their Sea Org membership, a necessary precondition to RPF membership, is their own chosen response to the uncomfortable fact of being alive, in an effort to make living in it not hopeless and needlessly painful, I don't see how it should be described as torture.
>Almost enough to induce >first circuit shock, sometimes actually passing that threshhold. Would you >condone this?
Why are you trying to argue to deprive some people's capacity to choose their religion and manner of affiliation with it based on a psychobabble accusation that lacks good evidence, being based on a biased take on a nonrepresentative sample of a subculture? That's a Scientology tactic to take an instance without questioning if it is representative and fashion a specious theory about it and call all that proof of something. Why are you coming up with your own variation on it?
There are distinctly specific instances where RPF members have been abused. I have seen or been subject to the same abuses or worse in public schools, health care institutions, workplaces, etc. In each case the remedy is particular to the case rather than being in a campaign to simply label the entire institution with Nazi-laden imagery.
Granted, I have never been on the RPF but I've known those who have and seen it up close. There is no representative depiction of the RPF as "slave labor camps" that is founded on anything but hysteria and venom. I agree that it is tragic that some people have had wrongful acts committed against them in the RPF and believe these specific instances merit legal redress.
= The a.r.s. prime directive: Make Jokes About Scientologist's Deaths=
Example, regarding Attorney Moxon and his UNFORTUNATE loss: "Maybe he believes there are no underground transformer vaults in Europe." (JB Lingerman)
I take it you are being on such good behavior in your posts because of all the /. newcomers.
>Yes, one of which resulted in a multi-million dollar judgment against >them. The treatment doled out in the RPF was found to be more than >"rude."
If you are trying to get me to credit the testimony of the case you cited to evidence the activities complained of, you may have an uphill battle. Most of the punitive damages in that case can be probably be attributed to nonRPF events to the extent they were legitimate punitive damages. The plaintiff was no angel, either.
>Brainwashing in the RPF is simply illegal, > not constitutionally protected, >does not constitute "voluntary religious expression" and in many cases >does not constitute "religious expression" AT ALL.
Only expression constitutes expression, of course, but the amount of slack you get on that has a lot to do with how favorably society regards your religion.
If you are claiming there was a finding of "brainwashing" in the case you cite, I wish you'd to point it out.
And anyway, I just *love* the way people around here cite judges as if judges are fantastic experts on matters psychological. Apparently they get some kind of condensed course in psychological diagnosis in judge school that allows them to toss around loaded language of diagnosis and intuit which are true psychological theories, etc. Hey, here's an idea: shitcan all the psychology departments of universities because judges have it figured out which of the psychobabble theories are true.
The way I see it, when a judge foams at the mouth using loaded psychobabble language to condemn some activity or person it indicates bias on the part of the judge and lack of a solid case that can be put in plain language. These are deficits in flaming bigots of the bench a.r.s. critics love to cite, not virtues.
What did that case you cite have to do with brainwashing? Brainwashing, being a specious psychobabble theory method of labelling education of people that you disapprove of the contents or results of, may or may not exist, but what did that case have to do with it???
= The a.r.s. prime directive: Make Jokes About Scientologist's Deaths=
Example, regarding Attorney Moxon and his UNFORTUNATE loss: "Maybe he believes there are no underground transformer vaults in Europe." (JB Lingerman)
> >please. The above working conditions you describe were SOUGHT OUT by the > >people you describe. Not forced upon them as punitive justice. The course > >work you describe is not typically the material a scientologist wants to > >study, but KSW materials, Command Chain materials, and Ethics issues. They > >are subjected to Sec Checking under duress. They CANNOT LEAVE.
> What you describe might be true of some people's RPF experience, and I have > heard a few credible stories of people being actively physically detained in > the RPF - Stacy Brooks for instance. I believe the bulk of RPF staff have > remained due to moral constraints and not physical restraint. They are in the > first place Sea Org members, a status they sought out with an understanding > that it would become central to who they are and how they spend all their > available time, indicating a preexisting high level of commitment to their > faith and to enduring harsh conditions and meager rewards to promote it. They > are in the second place able to avoid the RPF by leaving the Sea Org, and at > least grudgingly acquiesce to RPF membership. You forget that few Scientology > facilities are located outside urban areas, the RPF is working on grounds of > major Sea Org facilities and can easily leave the grounds if that is what they > choose, though they would face punitive treatment if they left and tried to > come back. There appears to be some exception regarding the Gold base, though > even there it is hardly a prison camp, just slightly more rural and subject to > temptations to commit acts of detention or intimidation.
Where would these people go? They have no money, no clothes, no food, and all of their friends are organization members. Where is the support base to escape Flag? Hitch-hike? Where? Lose your bridge for eternity? After so much hard work already under the bridge?
You are probably right that there is little physical restraint used, although I practically had to knock my E/O out to get past her when I was taking flight. Now she acts like I was expelled, but really they were pleading with me up until my last day to figure out some solution other than dropping my hat. However, I was near my parents houses, and could easily hitch-hike home, or they would have come and gotten me.
The SO specializes in hard-selling the idealist which volunteer for service, totally unwitting about the deception and fraud they are subjecting themselves to. Yes, they know there will be long hours, and that they will be called upon to give their life in a good cause, if necessary. But they are told they will be the elite of scientology. Only SO can be Class XII. There are many SO only training actions, and I assume the same is true on the processing side of the bridge (I have never heard of gang-bang sec-checks on Class IV [V now?] org staff or public). You get the snappy naval uniform, the chance to work on the Ship, or the Mecca of Technical perfection. You could get trained up to be part of the Universe Corps esto team when the org you came from goes Saint Hill (I'm still holding my breath on Boston). You are trained that there is no more important or ethical activity that you could engage in, for the next billion years. And when you arrive? Rice and beans. Bad teeth. No medical attention. Exhaustion. Tone 40 Control techniques. Almost as if the SO were specifically designed to dishearten idealistic scientologists. Ruin self-esteem. The job you did is NEVER good enough, unless stats are 5.4x, while OSA keeps foot-bulleting, prices keep rising, staff and public keep leaving. It is so bleak that you think, with all this tech, I must be the problem. And you might search yourself, introverting for years, and never find the awful thing you must be hiding, even from yourself. I JUST COGGED. HOLY SHIT :) They were deliberately creating the missed withhold of nothing phenomena. Alienating me from myself! All that time, I bought it. Anyway, I am sure this same bit happens to lots of staff, which is why they are always so downtone about what's going on with their own pursuits. They are failures! Just look at the orgs! Look at the fucking 35 dollars that is your paycheck. It almost makes me want to cry, thinking about it. I make that much in two hours, these days, and have plans to make it in one. In a society that measures success by how well you stack up against the Jones', how do you think these people feel. And they work so bleeding hard... Too bad really. If they weren't adults, the things done to them, wittingly or not would be considered neglect, mental abuse and cruelty, and they would become wards of the state.
> >Surely you can see that this is a human rights violation? If not slavery, > >it is imprisonment and psychological torture, accompanied by total > >disconnection from their families and friends.
> No, I don't see that. Staff membership in the Sea Organization is founded on > consensual relationships that terminate when the person wishing to terminate it > decides. Consent eliminates violation.
Consent given under fraudulent claims and misrepresentation of the actual situation?
> RPFers have family time like other staff, are not imprisoned, and are not > psycholoigcally tortured by RPF activities to any greater extent than they are > psychologically tortured by the fact of existing in an apparently pointless > universe filled with suffering, i.e. suffer the common human condition, or by > undergoing counseling which exposes one's flaws and penetrates and defeats > one's illadaptive defenses, in the manner some psychotherapy does. If reality > therapy, gestalt, psychoanalysis, etc. are all torture then I'd accept that the > RPF is too. Since their Sea Org membership, a necessary precondition to RPF > membership, is their own chosen response to the uncomfortable fact of being > alive, in an effort to make living in it not hopeless and needlessly painful, I > don't see how it should be described as torture.
Life is not hopeless and needlessly painful. Its a pissing good time when you get the people away from you that drag you down, discover something valuable about yourself and begin exchanging it with the wider MORE ETHICAL world outside the Church. In fact, just having to point that out to you gets me kind of depressed. I might have to go have a beer, some good food at 30 dollars a plate, and contemplate how narrowly I avoided serfdom to the Church.
> >Almost enough to induce > >first circuit shock, sometimes actually passing that threshhold. Would you > >condone this?
> Why are you trying to argue to deprive some people's capacity to choose their > religion and manner of affiliation with it based on a psychobabble accusation > that lacks good evidence, being based on a biased take on a nonrepresentative > sample of a subculture? That's a Scientology tactic to take an instance > without questioning if it is representative and fashion a specious theory about > it and call all that proof of something. Why are you coming up with your own > variation on it?
I am not arguing to deprive people of their religion, or anything else. You are representing as if the SO were forthcoming about the actual stats on scientology to their applicants, that they are told the truth about actual conditions, that they are aware of the actions of their organization- in short, as if it were bound by workplace laws, subject to any kind of oversight from unbiased parties (and Ron ensured that Scientology would never consider ANY outside party unbiased or able). They are deceiving people, which is why they need the hard sell, and why staff members are afraid of SO missions, why public disappear when the SO arrives. I never got it, because I was an idealist, and thought that maybe the other people around me had compromised their own integrity so severely that they could not see the opportunity working for the SO was. Backwards. They all saw, clearer than myself, that the SO destroys orgs with their "helpful" missions, that cost the org about ten thousand dollars per day, that there were things being done that average scientologists didn't agree with but certainly did not want to confront management over, due to concerns about loss of bridge, disconnection, etc.
> There are distinctly specific instances where RPF members have been abused. I > have seen or been subject to the same abuses or worse in public schools, health > care institutions, workplaces, etc. In each case the remedy is particular to > the case rather than being in a campaign to simply label the entire institution > with Nazi-laden imagery.
There is not a global policy covering the institution of this abuse in the other cases you are thinking of. The Church doesn't have isolated incidents, where this happens as an accident, it is all there in red/green on white. Or in SO mission orders, as the case may be, although these are probably destroyed after a sensitive, possible out-pr outcome. The "isolated incidents" don't happen by some dude getting up and acting on his own- NO. It happens because some dude applies POLICY, because he is a fanatic who has lost sight of his own decency due to exhaustion, malnutrition, Tone 40, "ethics", sec checking. The real reason an SO member doesn't leave isn't because he is necessarily afraid of reprisal, but because he is afraid he would have to admit that he had slid down a slippery slope of increasingly betraying his own internal compass, and mortgaged his awareness to the "greater good" of scientology INTERNATIONAL, which he is continually lied to about. GIGO, buddy.
> Granted, I have never been on the RPF but I've known those who have and seen it > up close. There is no representative depiction of the RPF as "slave