Perry Scott wrote:
> Psyberdude (d...@deepwell.com) wrote:
> : Hi Everyone:
> Hi Dude,
> : I am new to this newsgroup. I find it very fascinating. I was a Scientologist
> : and worked on staff for awhile back in Los Angeles around the late seventies.
> : I was promised auditing in exchange for being on staff,
> The bait
> : but the auditing never appeared.
> and switch.
It is exactly that. Aside from a few people who lucked out and got
into TTCs (full time training) I never knew anybody who got substantial
auditing while on staff. All they give you is sec checks.
> : Now I have some questions that I would like to ask some of you free-zoners.
> : How do I begin to audit myself? I've only had about two hours of auditing in
> : my whole life. If I buy an E-meter, can I start self-auditing right away?
> There are plans for free-zone E-meters. Don't spend money on a
> Co$-approved one - they are overpriced.
Free Zone e-meters have existed for years. Contact Holistic Clearing,
Box 4326, San Rafael, CA, 94913.
I suspect that the Free Zone tech was stolen to design the new Quantum
meter. Its principal advantage over traditional meters is the ability
to read properly in the presence of high TA, which FZ meters have had
for years. Again, you can find people on ACT who know way more about
this subject than I do.
The Alphametrics meter costs about $900 new, roughly 1/5th the cost of
a cult meter.
> : Can I use the Excaliber stuff, or the Scio stuff to do it? Or do I have to
> : have get auditing done by a free-zone auditor first, before I can learn to
> : self-audit?
Personally I'd recommend working with a professional at least until
you've run the grades. If you aren't in good shape in these areas -
communication, problems, overts(misdeeds), ARC breaks (upsets),
serv facs (self-justification) - I don't think you can run solo with
any success. I would also recommend against trying it without some
training by an experienced counselor, but these are your choices.
> I'd recommend asking Ralph Hilton - I understand he's somewhere near
> Germany. I think he's ralphATatnet.net, or scan a.r.s. and a.c.t. for
> his posts.
Ralph's a good guy. I second this.
> : Thanks for any input that you folks can give me on these questions. And
> : thanks for all the great work that some of you are doing to keep Scientology
> : free from the stranglehold of the Church.
> Are you saying the Church of Scientology does not support religious
> freedom? I wonder what Senator D'Amato would think? <g>
I think he's saying 'Where is that check you promised?'