On 20 Sep 1998 09:09:28 GMT, deadage
...@aol.com (DeadAgent1) wrote:
>Helluva thing to read this newsgroup after not reading it
>for over a year.
>ARS has become a carricature of itself. Ugly sonbitch.
how could it be a caricature of itself? it was already a caricature of
itself when you left, if you really are rocky the flying squirrel and not
some impostor or OSA agent or something.
(shit. . .that's what you're talking about, right?)
>ARS = the mother of all on-line cultish groups.
>And the mother of all straw dogs, is the ARSCC
>version of Scientology
LRH sez "what you resist you become." while not a guaranteed truth, it is
a good warning sign for those who go out to be an "anti" anything. it is
hard not to be a mirror to what you despise, but it is worthwhile to try
not to do so while continuing to oppose it.
>We used to have some fun on this NG, (believe it or not)
actually those of us here sometimes do.
you came here at a pretty ugly time, usually it's not quite *this* awful.
(ok it's always this awful, but sometimes it's funnier.)
>Looks like a wasteland to me now. (and a waste of time)
"[ars] would have to be a hundred times more dignified
just to be called sleazy." -dennis erlich
>The ARSCC (which doesn't exist), in an insane war with an evil
>criminal cult. (which also doesn't exist) YAWN - how can
ok. true for you. it is true, the eeeevil sinister cult controlling the
world's governments does not exist, but instead a fairly squalid commercial
enterprise squeaking by on the 501(c)(3) it got through blackmail and
criminal harassment.
that doesn't make the illegitimacy of scn's 501(c)(3) any less a thing to
be opposed, and even with overblown rhetoric at times.
many of the other evils of scientology are also ones that we simply have to
tolerate--that they inflict a flagrantly bogus cosmology on their members
for instance. fortunately people choose to believe stupid things and have
the right to do so. no, not unfortunately, fortunately. while the endless
gaggles of idiots professing any manner of insane beliefs can be annoying,
it is a million times better than any filthy hellhole whee you are instead
forced to believe only what you are told.
but scientology does not stand for freedom, but for the right to have their
own lunatic beliefs while denying others rights to have lunatic beliefs
such as that scientology is an insane criminal cult.
(actually, it *is*.)
you can't hand freedom of speech to one bunch of loonies and then deny it
to others based on the fact that one bunch of loonies has millions of
dollars to file as many lawsuits as it needs to bankrupt you, whether the
charges are even true.
>combatants (either side) take this bull so seriously. ya all
>need to run repetitive "lighten up to EP" for a few hundred
>hrs. (and then maybe get a life)
grady ward has a life.
of coughing up two hundred bucks a month the rest of his life to a criminal
organization. freedom of speech? well, yeah. . .
but it ain't free.
>Yeh, from the perspective of this newsgroup
>the pickets etc. are very noble, brave etc.
>But from any rational perspective, picketers
>are mostly playing the role of the fool even
>though praised as heros in their own little world.
thanks for the vote of confidence. just so you know, people who exercise
their right to free speech, regardless of how expensive it is, preserve it
for those who sit on their ass and don't even exercise it.
>And what are Scientologists doing even bothering
>to post here. Why play with these people?
they have millions to make if they can just shut up all opposition.
i would think their motives are obvious.
>Usenet can be fun, entertaining, educational, and
>even useful. BUT... you can get so rapped up in it and
>so sucked into it that you think you're a warrior
>taking part in the making of history, when in reality
>you're jsut the same old you and you're just
>jerk jerking off. (to the cheers of other jerks
>doing the same)
perhaps so.
>Saving people from Scientology? Protecting the world
>from domination by an evil cult? Yeh, sure, whatever.
it is highly unlikely the cult will ever take over the world. it is more
likely something even more evil but less stupid is a greater threat.
>What a waste. All this time and effort could be going into
>something worthwhile or useful in the real world.
would that be the real world in which lisa mcpherson died, or the real
world in which people remain in the RPF?
>Didn't see it at the time, but Bernie was right all along. Ya all
>are whatchya think you're fighting. All of ya.
at times, yes. it is still worth the fight to keep those times to a
minimum, and end that which is opposed.
>But of course YOU know the TRUTH and you're so damn right
>and now ya got yourself in a position ya can never back away from.
dude. you do not *know* how many positions i have backed away from.
>Of such things are traps made.
if scn ends the worst of its abuses and becomes merely as nasty and abusive
as any other run-of-the-mill goof-group, i will be flyin' out of here so
fast you wouldn't believe it.
i ain't seen it yet. i think the nutsiness of scientology has only begun.
>ROCKY (the yawning flying squirell)
rob