I'm posting this for Deep Wog (who was the better half at the APA
counterpicket):
The BURGERFLIPPER scribbled:
>Now, THIS I find remarkable.
Are all $cientologists so easily amused?
Oh wait. I forgot. One of the first things $cientology must destroy
is the sense of humour. No doubt open laughter is an ethics
violation;
to the RPF with the offenders!
>We have Deana Holmes discussing her Anti-Scn-ism WRT her family and
>friends in much the same terms and circumstances as many a new
>Scientologist!
Well, KNUCKLECRACKER, I guess you'll just have to produce these "many"
"new scientologists" before we can give your claims more weight than
a neutrino, eh?
>Her zeal is not shared by them nor is it well understood. She feels she
>must convert them! Some think she's crazy!
It's funny, I sometimes think the same thing when I see otherwise
normal
human beings standing on busy sidewalks, trying to "convert" passers
by
to the 'glorious' tenants of the "Church" of $cientology.
Who but a borderline nutcase would do something like this? Especially
with the *proven fact* that the "Church" IS a criminal cult. The
answer,
of course, without question, absolutely NO doubt, is that *NO ONE*
would
do this -- these people are dupes of the criminal cult.
This explains why the "Church" so frightened of the pickets. It
certainly can't be the act of informaing the public; even the Co$
knows that the average member of the public would rather live beside
an
open tank of raw sewage rotting in the bright August sunshine than
reside
next door to an Org of the Criminal Cult. Naturally. So it must be
the
'church' is terrified -- in a near panic -- that current members of
the
cult discover the truth. It doesn't take much; just a whee *whiff*
of that potent elixir, and a lifelong addict is formed and the cult
is down one more member. Yes indeed, without a doubt, the criminal
cult
is firmly on the path of slowly suffering a death of a thousand cuts
[revenue
cuts, of course!] if it keeps to current form.
>This is fascinating, and you just can't fail to see the parallels. I
>wonder how many other cult-of-critics members have the same problems.
Good Bob! Is the CANDYWRAPPER next going to suggest that even the
critics must eat, sleep and (gasp!) breath? Can it be true? What
other
ominous parallels are there between the critics and your average Co$
flunky on alt.religion.scientology? Is there *any* substance to
recent
reports that the critics also have to go to the washroom -- just like
a member of the criminal cult?
>Henson, apparently. Anyone else? Practically all, I'll bet.
>There's a Scn principle: What you resist you become -- if you lose.
You certainly *are* revealing today, aren't you, WOODYWHACKER? Like
most people, you were "resisting" the urge to be a member of the
criminal cult. After all, who wouldn't? People do not naturally want
to "destroy" someone else for the act of criticism -- it takes
special,
in depth, training only available (at great expense) from the criminal
cult to become someone like this.
So presumably you "lost" your struggle -- and became a $cientologist.
Grady Ward is dead-on: a criminal cult, made up of losers and
weaklings.
Now officially confirmed!
----------------------------------------------------------------
SP, Quake/2 addict, amateur rationalist.
-- http://www.total.net/~wulfen/scn --
"Science is a method, not an ideology."
----------------------------------------------------------------
