>>Unfortunately, no.  Someone dcc'd it to me once on irc, but I cannot
>>locate it now.  From memory, it was a carbon copy D/A attack against her
>>counsel, blaming him for all manner of crimes and saying he put her up
>>to it.

>>It looked _very_ like Kim's affidavit against Wollersheim.
>And very like the standard pattern for any "flip-flop" i.e.
>not that any person has blown OSA and become a critic then
>gone bactk to their old hat working in a sustained and loyal
>way on projects, but rather that someone has been subjected
>to immense pressure until they cave in long enough to sign
>a statement prewritten for them by OSA implicating whover OSA
>wants implicated [Ziegel -> Mayo, Baker -> Erlich];  that this
>is about all you can get out of a short-term cave-in; and,
>nine times out of ten, the person concerned will repudiate
>the lies they have signed. Even if there has been a financial
>settlement and gagging agreenment which will bankrupt them,
>they still often rebel and reoudiate what they have been coerced
>into signing.