In article <3658547F.6
...@vote4gop.org>,
rad_cn
...@vote4gop.org wrote:
Wait, this can't be Rad! Oh... I see now... good going.
I heard Rich went on a deletefest while I was off for the weekend.
> stephanie_her
...@my-dejanews.com wrote:
> You may have started the newsgroup, but it ain't yours.
It's more hers than Rich's.
> Where did I define you? You are as disconnected from reality as kbrauer.
Now he's denying defining Steph as a feminist. Whoa!
> > "Feminist ideology, though noble in its early quest for equality, seems to
> > perpetually abandon the ideal of personal responsibility. In 'The Second
> > Sex,' Simone de Beauvoir summed up the feminist attitude regarding female
> > culpability in 1949: 'A free individual blames only himself for his
failures,
> > he assumes responsibility for them; but everything happens to women through
> > the agency of others, and therefore these others are responsible for her
> > woes.'
> Funny, the last paragraph seems to describe attitudes of the women here
> WRT pregnancy to a tee.
It's a quote, not Stephanie's words. Maybe reading the rest of what she said
might help... wait, your poor oppressed fingers can't click to see.
> > > It remains a fact that sehlat has lied about what I have said. That you
defend
> > > lies rather shows where you really stand. And that ain't on the side of
truth,
> > > but on the side of women, which is exactly where NOW has always stood.
> > Oh, good grief. Sehlat has not lied,
> Sehlat *has* lied, repeatedly about what I have said.
but he can't prove it. I, on the other hand... just posted his beliefs about
me and a rebuttal. He has lied repeatedly about me. Have I lied? don't think
so.
> What merits do you see in her lies about what I have said stephanie?
> Or do you defend them by denying them?
She defends them because she knows I did not lie while he has.
> And if I find sehlat's constant lies insulting?
Read "the truth". Rich is confused.
> I find your defense of her lies equally insulting, no matter what you may
otherwise believe.
Read "the truth" in place of my so-called "lies". :)
> You may not get it, but no matter what is on those web-pages, sehlat's lies
> remain an issue, as does your defense of said lies.
What lies? Can't come up with any. They would have been called down ages ago.
The truth hurts, doesn't it?
> Like you girls do here? I have not seen any of you provide any basis for
> the stuff you claim. And I don't *do* double standards, either play as
> you expect me to play, or disabuse yourself of the notion that I must dance
> to the tune you play.
Oh, you don't do double standards. You do not require men to practice
responsible sexuality at all, placing all of the responsibility on the woman.
You say you want the truth, but when you get it, you automatically twist it
into something we don't believe. Your own beliefs about pregnancy reinforce
the double standards against fathers in child custody cases. Get real.
> Let's see, what is the name of your site and this newsgroup? Oh yes,
> right,
> what is that, grrls. Not right persons, not right gerbils, but grrls,
> seems
> that we have some sexist bias right off. And you call yourself
> -feminists-.
Oh, so there is no room for women-only sites. Do you also support integration
of the Citadel? Guess what? I don't! If there is no room for Rightgrrl, there
is no room for Rightguyz. Shoot yourself in the foot. BTW. not all Rightgrrls
are feminist, in spite of your crying in your beer to the contrary.
> Feminism of course is about women, not equality. Seems that everything
> you
> do and say is about women, no? The text you posted above is about women
> by
> women, which is typical feminism, feminism ain't about boys or men.
This guy reminds me of the guy who got offended at the "Equal Rights for
Unborn Women" banner. Our issues don't affect men? Abortion kills little boys
and little girls alike. We have male supporters and contributors. I get
comments about my articles from men, and they're GOOD comments!
This guy needs help.
> Seems a bit late to deny that you have a bias and an agenda Stephanie.
If she has one, it's only against you. Seeing that she has a husband and son,
she can't be anti-male.
> now try to delete THIS! PUNK.....
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
There's Rad :)
-----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==----------
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
