Google Groups Home
Help | Sign in
Are Reports of UML's Demise Being Exaggerated?
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  2 messages - Collapse all
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post will appear after it is approved by moderators
edi...@uml-forum.com  
View profile
 More options Jun 3, 12:24 am
From: edi...@uml-forum.com
Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2008 21:24:42 -0700
Local: Tues, Jun 3 2008 12:24 am
Subject: Are Reports of UML's Demise Being Exaggerated?
May 15, 2008. - Are Reports of UML's Demise Being Exaggerated?
In an article entitled "13 reasons for UML's descent into darkness" Daniel Pietraru claims that "UML [has] lost the programmers." The author suggests that UML is becoming irrelevant to programmers due to causes that include design-by-committee syndrome, vendor greed, and concept bloat. Is UML usage waning or waxing? Is the quest for Round-Trip Engineering suffering a major setback? You can add your opinions to others discussing Pietraru's article on the "little tutorials" web site: http://littletutorials.com/2008/05/15/13-reasons-for-umls-descent-int...

    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
H. S. Lahman  
View profile
 More options Jun 3, 11:12 am
From: "H. S. Lahman" <h...@pathfindermda.com>
Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2008 11:12:21 -0400
Local: Tues, Jun 3 2008 11:12 am
Subject: Re: [UML Forum] Are Reports of UML's Demise Being Exaggerated?
Responding to editor...

> May 15, 2008. - Are Reports of UML's Demise Being Exaggerated?
> In an article entitled "13 reasons for UML's descent into darkness" Daniel Pietraru claims that "UML [has] lost the programmers." The author suggests that UML is becoming irrelevant to programmers due to causes that include design-by-committee syndrome, vendor greed, and concept bloat. Is UML usage waning or waxing? Is the quest for Round-Trip Engineering suffering a major setback? You can add your opinions to others discussing Pietraru's article on the "little tutorials" web site: http://littletutorials.com/2008/05/15/13-reasons-for-umls-descent-int...

Don't waste your time. For the agile OOP-based crowd UML represents BDUF
and Waterfall, which they see as the Great Satans of software
development. So they have been repeating these mantras for years. Don't
go down the rabbit hole by responding because it is a religious issue
for the Programming By Mantra crowd. For example, $nevermind that the
agile OOP-based processes all have well-defined waterfall processes at
the story and code fragment levels.

[Such discussions remind me of Haight-Ashbury coffee houses in the late
'60s. Someone takes a drag and proclaims something like, "Power to the
People!". To which there would be several responses like, "Yeah, man!",
"Right on!", and "You got it, man!" If some outsider was crass enough to
ask, "What power? What people?", that triggers another round of mantras
like, "The Power of Freedom!" and "Everyone being crushed by the
Establishment!". If the outsider continues the Quixotic quest for
substance, the ultimate chorus is, "You just don't get it!" and "You are
the Problem!" Been there; done that; grew up.]

FWIW, it is hard to see UML going away since it is currently the only
general purpose 4GL around. Anyone who believes that software
development is going to stagnate at the 3GL level should visit a local
retirement home and talk to some of the BAL developers of the '50s.

--
There is nothing wrong with me that could
not be cured by a capful of Drano.

H. S. Lahman
h...@pathfindermda.com
Pathfinder Solutions
http://www.pathfindermda.com
blog: http://pathfinderpeople.blogs.com/hslahman
"Model-Based Translation: The Next Step in Agile Development".  Email
i...@pathfindermda.com for your copy.
Pathfinder is hiring: http://www.pathfindermda.com/about_us/careers_pos3.php.
(888)OOA-PATH


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
End of messages
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2008 Google