Google Groups Home
Help | Sign in
Fish mis-credited for factor (M+2)2203, originally - hopefully now fixed!
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  1 message - Collapse all
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
bearnol  
View profile
 More options Oct 2 2006, 1:54 pm
From: "bearnol" <bear...@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2006 10:54:36 -0700
Local: Mon, Oct 2 2006 1:54 pm
Subject: Fish mis-credited for factor (M+2)2203, originally - hopefully now fixed!
It has come to my attention (thanks to a Google search on particular
digits - isn't Google wonderful?), that I (bearnol) inadvertently
mis-credited the discovery of the 36-digit factor of (M+2)2203.
I originally found this factor using Dario Alpern's (also pretty
wonderful, but anyway...) Java ECM factorizer when I first started
investigating these numbers, and so naturally enough, gave him credit
(and a fish!) for it.
However, this applet draws on a database (managed by yet another (!),
Will Edgington) into which the factor (along with, later, other M+2
factors found as part of this project proper, incidentally) had already
been inducted. Sadly this latter database (probably for sensible
technical reasons) lacks any system of accreditation, so I remained
none the wiser as to the original discoverer of (M+2)2203's factor.
This turns out to have been Tony Forbes (back in 1999 as part of his
own investigations into something else related), so hopefully it is now
fixed on the M+2 homepage!
J

    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
End of messages
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2008 Google