The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet. Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 |
From: "sidekick" <sidek...@gmail.com>Date: Tue, 24 May 2005 16:53:02 -0000
Local: Tues, May 24 2005 12:53 pm
Subject: About Hompy Forum
Willsin 在他的Blog的留言，寫了如下提問：
1.為什麼Hompy Forum 封鎖了Sidekick 的Forum (內有關的thread)?
2.為什麼連Forum
Subject都在未徵得當事人(sidekick)同意之下改了？
3.為什麼Hompy Admin
要千方百計迴護這個抄文抄到離譜的Blogger?
1 及 2
，都是我想知道的。剛巧本想寫一篇文放在自己的blog,
亦有1, 2, 的提問，
後來因接收icq 的incoming URL 蓋過了，真不巧...
因為第1
點，令我們未能看到Hompy其他會員的“精彩回應”，覺得很遺憾呢！
如果，覺得盜用他人文章沒有問題是大部份的會員，那麼，我會建議“突破機構”繼“網上日記與青少年調查”後，下一個研究課題，是“網上日記與青少年的知識產權概 念”之類的題目。
至於3, 我沒意見。
You must Sign in before you can post messages. You do not have the permission required to post.
|
|
From: "細仔" <speechless...@gmail.com>Date: Tue, 24 May 2005 16:58:50 -0000
Local: Tues, May 24 2005 12:58 pm
Subject: Re: About Hompy Forum
鎖題是因為我見到有置身事外的人火上加油.
而我覺得他們的comment並不中立(有人攻擊sidekick),
因此鎖題避免事件進一步受影響.
至於維護, 得知事件後,
我們已立即要求該用戶作出道歉.
在我們forum的其他topic中我亦已提出對有關問題之立場.
撫心自問並無任可維護企途.
謝
You must Sign in before you can post messages. You do not have the permission required to post.
|
|
From: Regina Yeung <regin...@gmail.com>Date: Wed, 25 May 2005 01:16:54 +0800
Local: Tues, May 24 2005 1:16 pm
Subject: Re: About Hompy Forum
question 1:因為細仔驚人多口雜,"講多錯多"，要將事件低調地"平息於萌芽狀態中"?
question 2: 原因同上，減低該帖title的觸目度，Admin可能以"此帖會引起紛爭破壞Forum和平環境"為由而改title及lock帖
question 3: 正觀望HOMPY會否有進一步行動
On 5/25/05, sidekick <sidek...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Willsin 在他的Blog的留言，寫了如下提問：
> 1.為什麼Hompy Forum 封鎖了Sidekick 的Forum (內有關的thread)?
> 2.為什麼連Forum
> Subject都在未徵得當事人(sidekick)同意之下改了？
> 3.為什麼Hompy Admin
> 要千方百計迴護這個抄文抄到離譜的Blogger?
> 1 及 2
> ，都是我想知道的。剛巧本想寫一篇文放在自己的blog,
> 亦有1, 2, 的提問，
> 後來因接收icq 的incoming URL 蓋過了，真不巧...
> 因為第1
> 點，令我們未能看到Hompy其他會員的"精彩回應"，覺得很遺憾呢！
> 如果，覺得盜用他人文章沒有問題是大部份的會員，那麼，我會建議"突破機構"繼"網上日記與青少年調查"後，下一個研究課題，是"網上日記與青少年的知識產權概 念"之類的題目。
> 至於3, 我沒意見。
Regina
My Blog:
http://absolutregina.blogspot.com
You must Sign in before you can post messages. You do not have the permission required to post.
|
|
From: "細仔" <speechless...@gmail.com>Date: Tue, 24 May 2005 10:27:06 -0700
Local: Tues, May 24 2005 1:27 pm
Subject: Re: About Hompy Forum
You must Sign in before you can post messages. You do not have the permission required to post.
|
|
From: "Cloudless.Net" <sun...@gmail.com>Date: Tue, 24 May 2005 17:59:00 -0700
Subject: Re: About Hompy Forum
第一和第二點的做法極為官僚。Forum中出現不同意見很正常，沒有必要封鎖topic。有人攻擊Sidekick也應該給Sidekick辯護的機會，或讓大 家公開討論。擅自改subject更不要得，簡直在利用極權。
You must Sign in before you can post messages. You do not have the permission required to post.
|
|
From: momo...@doramail.comDate: Tue, 24 May 2005 20:14:05 -0700
Local: Tues, May 24 2005 11:14 pm
Subject: Re: About Hompy Forum
會員不自重，那個媒體也會被拖垮。
經過這次，Hompy或Now.com的形象被好幾個人拖下來，我想blog界的朋友也會以此為鑒。
You must Sign in before you can post messages. You do not have the permission required to post.
|
|
From: sidekick <sidek...@gmail.com>Date: Wed, 25 May 2005 12:26:32 +0800
Local: Wed, May 25 2005 12:26 am
Subject: Re: About Hompy Forum
給Hompy 細仔的話:
睇怕你o地有大把教育工作要做...
而家問題有二,
1/ tat 冇認到自己係"刻意抄襲". ( 所以撻昨晚的道歉無效)
2/ 而班o靚仔亦認為就算撻o野都冇問題...
如果hompy 唔快d 同班o靚仔講明呢兩點,
同講明hompy "條款"上已寫明唔準撻o野, 繼續由得班o靚仔亂講.
我估大家真係會覺得有需要整個blog, 將tat d 文逐篇對證.
到時, 唯恐 hompy 個名會有影響...
You must Sign in before you can post messages. You do not have the permission required to post.
|
|
From: "pig" <florap...@gmail.com>Date: Wed, 25 May 2005 04:32:54 -0000
Local: Wed, May 25 2005 12:32 am
Subject: Re: About Hompy Forum
似乎香港blogger推廣 blog
不只是網上日記既同時還應推廣良好既blog 文化。
You must Sign in before you can post messages. You do not have the permission required to post.
|
|
From: Regina Yeung <regin...@gmail.com>Date: Wed, 25 May 2005 12:36:29 +0800
Local: Wed, May 25 2005 12:36 am
Subject: Re: About Hompy Forum
You must Sign in before you can post messages. You do not have the permission required to post.
|
|
From: Regina Yeung <regin...@gmail.com>Date: Wed, 25 May 2005 12:46:01 +0800
Local: Wed, May 25 2005 12:46 am
Subject: Re: About Hompy Forum
You must Sign in before you can post messages. You do not have the permission required to post.
|
|
From: Sputnik <sputnik1...@gmail.com>Date: Wed, 25 May 2005 13:49:45 +0800
Local: Wed, May 25 2005 1:49 am
Subject: Re: About Hompy Forum
歪理一堆!
不過呢句啱: "網路既好處就係大家見唔到樣,冇左面對面既恐懼感,
亦都唔雖要顧及自己形象,有某部分人就借呢點,
做一D平日自己唔會做同講既野,講左唔洗負責任丫麻"
<==因為個撻唔駛顧及自己形象, 又以為自己唔駛負責任, 所以咪大肆抄文囉!
(不過個撻平日有冇做開呢D野,真係唔知啦~)
講得好!
在 2005/5/25，Madboy <leesin...@yahoo.com> 撰寫：
> 另外希望Hompy版主能夠對以下謠言作出澄清。
> 因為我們並不認識當事人。
> http://forum.netvigator.com/forum/thread.jspa?threadID=56112&start=12...
> 思念的潮漲●靚佬
> Re: 當一個人屈完機扮冇屈機，就會咁講
> 張貼於: 2005年5月25日 下午12:55
> 其實件事由頭到尾都唔關top
> one,抄文,按F5,列出處,版權問題
> 只係要人處處針對,撻撻我諗你都估到果個人係邊個,
> 所以大家都唔再需要為別人既指摘而煩惱,
> 既然別人有心惡意攻擊,又唔用自己ACC,
> 大家既理論同分析都係徙然,你就算做好晒以上問題,
> HOMPY只有原創文章同圖片,相信別人都會用第種方式攻擊你,
> 網路既好處就係大家見唔到樣,冇左面對面既恐懼感,
> 亦都唔雖要顧及自己形象,有某部分人就借呢點,
> 做一D平日自己唔會做同講既野,講左唔洗負責任丫麻,
> 咁你仲理佢做咩?
> http://hompy.netvigator.com/main/page/vikingwong
> 再者說說我的好友，好友今期可以話係做左箭靶，先唔講版權與抄文問題，好友的Hompy內每一篇文章都被人攻擊，可見對方功課做足，亦非一日之事，大家亦明白到 攻擊者既用意，明顯係處心積慮......
You must Sign in before you can post messages. You do not have the permission required to post.
|
|
From: sidekick <sidek...@gmail.com>Date: Wed, 25 May 2005 13:55:05 +0800
Local: Wed, May 25 2005 1:55 am
Subject: Re: About Hompy Forum
頭先click 進去vikingwong個hompy, 見到佢show o左我o個hompy條link 出o黎,
原來佢講緊"明顯係處心積慮......"o既人係我!
有趣! :)
On 5/25/05, Sputnik <sputnik1 |
|
