Google Groups Home
Help | Sign in
fluoro Softbox vs fluoro Lightbank (was Longtime discussion - cheap fluoro lighting for DV)
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  1 message - Collapse all
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
Randy Quimpo  
View profile
 More options May 12, 7:19 am
From: "Randy Quimpo" <randy.qui...@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 12 May 2008 19:19:05 +0800
Local: Mon, May 12 2008 7:19 am
Subject: fluoro Softbox vs fluoro Lightbank (was Longtime discussion - cheap fluoro lighting for DV)
I am aware that these kinoflo-type lightbanks produce a very soft
light, but does this eliminate the need for softboxes?

Long time ago, its was assumed that softboxes used tungsten bulbs
(Chimera, etc), but what complicates this is that there are now fluoro
softboxes - what is this, a softlight (the fluoro bulb) made softer?

What differentiates these? Is it the light spill, light quality, etc?
Or is it a matter of convenience (lightbank = smaller kit, softbox =
big kit)? Or is it the setup time (lightbank = fast setup, softbox =
slow setup)?

One thing for sure, it seems the softbox solution is much cheaper.

rgds/RandyQ


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
End of messages
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2008 Google