Google Groups Home
Help | Sign in
David Stannard on Bai tunze....
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  3 messages - Collapse all
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
Hank Murrow  
View profile
 More options Jun 23, 11:37 pm
From: Hank Murrow <hmur...@efn.org>
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 20:37:02 -0700
Local: Mon, Jun 23 2008 11:37 pm
Subject: David Stannard on Bai tunze....

David Stannard was queried by Steve Harrison (down under) concerning  
David's visit to the bai tunze mine at Jingdezhen in '82. This is his  
response to Steve...... It should be noted that the bai tunze of Song  
times in resembles the current material only in its elemental  
components. The original bai tunze was weathered and plastic and  
formed almost the entire body, while the current material is  
unweathered, not plastic, and represents only around 30% of the  
current body there.

Cheers, Hank

Steve,

I did, finally got a note & CD to Suzie McMeekin last week--  & v.  
nice reply today..

I *do* intend to respond to your query re 'bai tunze' shortly-- I've  
just got back in touch with my friend Zhang Fukang(China's primo  
historical-glaze researcher & '82 Intnl Conf organizer) who'd  
arranged for me to talk to a geologist from Jingdezhen Ceram. Inst  
during our visit there in '82.

He can give us the current contact person in Jing de zhen for you to  
consult, I think, about where-abouts & operating condition of the  
mine site I visited. Zhang Fukang(lives in Shanghai) is in poor  
health, but I'll e-mail him soon for contact info.

When I was there in '82 the mine entrance was right near a small  
creek, and I could imagine that the surface-exposed aplite dyke(20%+  
sericite) may have weathered to an iron-free, plastic clay which  
potters found useful back in Tang times(??). In past millennia the  
dyke has been followed underground (at a steep angle & ~80m wide),  
now is 7km+ long. I have the analysis they gave me somewhere buried  
in my basement papers & may find it. It was primarily qtz & some k-
spar, with <20% sericite & <1% siderite, as I recall. It wouldn't  
surprise me if there were, also, other sites.

They were airfloating & bagging it @400 mesh. I grabbed a sample  
chunk of the aplite off their rock-pile at the processong yard. The  
dyke had been followed under the Ridge, and in the next valley near  
where it might reappear was an area they were now gathering kaolin to  
add to the body. I'll let you know what I hear from Zhang fukang.  
Personally, I imagine that the site may be more of historical than  
practical significance.

I notice that our NCECA crowd seem now to have extensive contact with  
the Jing de zhen Institute, promoting Art, Travel, Workshops,  
Exchange, etc. (My impression is that this relationship is more a  
promotion of Art & Status than focus on Process). Hank would be  
better informed about how to pursure inquiry along those lines than I.

David...................

On Feb 6, 2008, at 2:42 AM, steve harrison wrote:

Hi David,
I hope that this email finds you well, and that your efforts to  
contact Suzie McMeekin went OK.
I have a favor to ask of you.
I read somewhere that you had been to china in the 80's sometime and  
visited the  bai tunze (Pei tun se) quarry somewhere near Jingdezhen.
I am hoping to find that quarry and collect some samples for  
comparison to my own porcelain stone.
I would be very appreciative if you might forward to me any  
information that you might have regarding the site of the sericite  
dyke, particularly directions on how to find it.

Best wishes

Steve Harrison


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
hambone  
View profile
 More options Jul 1, 7:11 pm
From: hambone <kansaspot...@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2008 16:11:32 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Tues, Jul 1 2008 7:11 pm
Subject: Re: David Stannard on Bai tunze....
Hank: NCECA's interest is via Bob Anderson at Morgantown and Joe
Zeller. The recent course offering thru NCECA was piloted by WVU. I've
talked to Bob and Joe and I don't have an inkling that the geological
and archeological, art historical aspects of old Chinese pots are a
big deal to them. Not really sure why not, tho.
H A M B O N E

On Jun 23, 11:37 pm, Hank Murrow <hmur...@efn.org> wrote:


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Discussion subject changed to "*ClayCraft* Re: David Stannard on Bai tunze...." by Hank Murrow
Hank Murrow  
View profile
 More options Jul 1, 9:49 pm
From: Hank Murrow <hmur...@efn.org>
Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2008 18:49:19 -0700
Local: Tues, Jul 1 2008 9:49 pm
Subject: Re: *ClayCraft* Re: David Stannard on Bai tunze....

On Jul 1, 2008, at 4:11 PM, hambone wrote:

> Hank:
> NCECA's interest is via Bob Anderson at Morgantown and Joe
> Zeller. The recent course offering thru NCECA was piloted by WVU. I've
> talked to Bob and Joe and I don't have an inkling that the geological
> and archeological, art historical aspects of old Chinese pots are a
> big deal to them. Not really sure why not, tho.

Well, the kiss of death at NCECA is to mention constituents of clays  
or kilns of any sort. Most interaction there involves getting  
promoted and being seen as promotable in my experience (going back to  
1970). NCECA is largely a meeting of academicians, after all.

The Clayart Room is probably the best locale to pursue such questions  
of process and material...... and of course, our delightful Clayart  
Forum right here on our laptops.

Cheers, Hank


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
End of messages
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2008 Google